Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T02:39:48.531Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluating Young's Modulus of Single Yeast Cells Based on Compression Using an Atomic Force Microscope with a Flat Tip

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 January 2021

Di Chang Open the ORCID record for Di Chang [Opens in a new window] ,
Takahiro Hirate ,
Chihiro Uehara Open the ORCID record for Chihiro Uehara [Opens in a new window] ,
Hisataka Maruyama Open the ORCID record for Hisataka Maruyama [Opens in a new window] ,
Nobuyuki Uozumi Open the ORCID record for Nobuyuki Uozumi [Opens in a new window]  and
Fumihito Arai Open the ORCID record for Fumihito Arai [Opens in a new window]
Di Chang*
Affiliation:
Department of Micro-Nano Mechanical Science and Engineering, Nagoya University, Room 108, Aerospace Mechanical Engineering Research Building, Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi464-8603, Japan
Takahiro Hirate
Affiliation:
Department of Micro-Nano Mechanical Science and Engineering, Nagoya University, Room 108, Aerospace Mechanical Engineering Research Building, Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi464-8603, Japan
Chihiro Uehara
Affiliation:
Department of Biomolecular Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Tohoku University, Aobayama 6-6-07, Sendai980-8579, Japan
Hisataka Maruyama
Affiliation:
Department of Micro-Nano Mechanical Science and Engineering, Nagoya University, Room 108, Aerospace Mechanical Engineering Research Building, Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi464-8603, Japan
Nobuyuki Uozumi
Affiliation:
Department of Biomolecular Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Tohoku University, Aobayama 6-6-07, Sendai980-8579, Japan
Fumihito Arai
Affiliation:
Department of Micro-Nano Mechanical Science and Engineering, Nagoya University, Room 108, Aerospace Mechanical Engineering Research Building, Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi464-8603, Japan Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo113-8654, Japan
*
*Author for correspondence: Di Chang, E-mail: changdi@biorobotics.mech.nagoya-u.ac.jp
Get access

Abstract

In this research, atomic force microscopy (AFM) with a flat tip cantilever is utilized to measure Young's modulus of a whole yeast cell (Saccharomyces cerevisiae BY4741). The results acquired from AFM are similar to those obtained using a microfluidic chip compression system. The mechanical properties of single yeast cells are important parameters which can be examined using AFM. Conventional studies apply AFM with a sharp cantilever tip to indent the cell and measure the force-indentation curve, from which Young's modulus can be calculated. However, sharp tips introduce problems because the shape variation can lead to a different result and cannot represent the stiffness of the whole cell. It can lead to a lack of broader meaning when evaluating Young's modulus of yeast cells. In this report, we confirm the differences in results obtained when measuring the compression of a poly(dimethylsiloxane) bead using a commercial sharp tip versus a unique flat tip. The flat tip effectively avoids tip-derived errors, so we use this method to compress whole yeast cells and generate a force–deformation curve. We believe our proposed method is effective for evaluating Young's modulus of whole yeast cells.

Keywords

atomic force microscopycompressionmicrofluidic chipyeast cellYoung's modulus
Type
Biological Applications
Information
Microscopy and Microanalysis , Volume 27 , Issue 2 , April 2021 , pp. 392 - 399
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahmad, MR, Nakajima, M, Kojima, S, Homma, M & Fukuda, T (2008). The effects of cell sizes, environmental conditions, and growth phases on the strength of individual W303 yeast cells inside ESEM. IEEE Trans NanoBioscience 7, 185–193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alsteens, D, Dupres, V, Mc Evoy, K, Wildling, L, Gruber, HJ & Dufrêne, YF (2008). Structure, cell wall elasticity and polysaccharide properties of living yeast cells, as probed by AFM. Nanotechnology 19, 384005.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andriukonis, E, Stirke, A, Garbaras, A, Mikoliunaite, L, Ramanaviciene, A, Remeikis, V, Thornton, B & Ramanavicius, A (2018). Yeast-assisted synthesis of polypyrrole: Quantification and influence on the mechanical properties of the cell wall. Colloids Surf, B 164, 224–231.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arfsten, J, Bradtmöller, C, Kampen, I & Kwade, A (2008). Compressive testing of single yeast cells in liquid environment using a nanoindentation system. J Mater Res 23, 3153–3160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barazani, B, Warnat, S, Fine, A & Hubbard, T (2016). MEMS squeezer for the measurement of single cell rupture force, stiffness change, and hysteresis. J. Micromech Microeng 27, 025002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolshakova, AV, Kiselyova, OI, Filonov, AS, Frolova, OY, Lyubchenko, YL & Yaminsky, IV (2001). Comparative studies of bacteria with an atomic force microscopy operating in different modes. Ultramicroscopy 86, 121–128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brachmann, CB, Davies, A, Cost, GJ, Caputo, E, Li, J, Hieter, P & Boeke, JD (1998). Designer deletion strains derived from Saccharomyces cerevisiae 1004 S288C: A useful set of strains and plasmids for PCR-mediated gene disruption and 1005 other applications. Yeast 14, 115–132.3.0.CO;2-2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bui, VC, Kim, YU & Choi, SS (2008). Physical characteristics of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Surf Interface Anal 40, 1323–1327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buijs, NA, Siewers, V & Nielsen, J (2013). Advanced biofuel production by the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr Opin Chem Biol 17, 480–488.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chang, D, Sakuma, S, Kera, K, Uozumi, N & Arai, F (2018). Measurement of the mechanical properties of single Synechocystis sp. strain PCC6803 cells in different osmotic concentrations using a robot-integrated microfluidic chip. Lab Chip 18, 1241–1249.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chaudhari, RD, Stenson, JD, Overton, TW & Thomas, CR (2012). Effect of bud scars on the mechanical properties of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell walls. Chem Eng Sci 84, 188–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dague, E, Bitar, R, Ranchon, H, Durand, F, Yken, HM & François, JM (2010). An atomic force microscopy analysis of yeast mutants defective in cell wall architecture. Yeast 27, 673–684.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dague, E, Jauvert, E, Laplatine, L, Viallet, B, Thibault, C & Ressier, L (2011). Assembly of live micro-organisms on microstructured PDMS stamps by convective/capillary deposition for AFM bio-experiments. Nanotechnology 22, 395102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deaner, M, Mejia, J & Alper, HS (2017). Enabling graded and large-scale multiplex of desired genes using a dual-mode dCas9 activator in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. ACS Synth Biol 6, 1931–1943.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edlich, A, Magdanz, V, Rasch, D, Demming, S, Aliasghar Zadeh, S, Segura, R, Kähler, C, Radespiel, R, Büttgenbach, S, Franco-Lara, E & Krull, R (2010). Microfluidic reactor for continuous cultivation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Prog 26, 1259–1270.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Faria, EC, Ma, N, Gazi, E, Gardner, P, Brown, M, Clarke, NW & Snook, RD (2008). Measurement of elastic properties of prostate cancer cells using AFM. Analyst 133, 1498–1500.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldenbogen, B, Giese, W, Hemmen, M, Uhlendorf, J, Herrmann, A & Klipp, E (2016). Dynamics of cell wall elasticity pattern shapes the cell during yeast mating morphogenesis. Open Biol 6, 160136.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Götze, H & Pagel, L (2007). Development of a micro-manipulator based on piezoelectric-technology. Microelectron Eng 84, 1333–1336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halldorsson, S, Lucumi, E, Gómez-Sjöberg, R & Fleming, RM (2015). Advantages and challenges of microfluidic cell culture in polydimethylsiloxane devices. Biosens Bioelectron 63, 218–231.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hertz, H (1882). Ueber die Berührung fester elastischer Körper. Int J Eng Sci 1882, 156–171.Google Scholar
Kasas, S & Ikai, A (1995). A method for anchoring round shaped cells for atomic force microscope imaging. Biophys J 68, 1678–1680.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kopycinska-Müller, M, Geiss, RH & Hurley, DC (2006). Contact mechanics and tip shape in AFM-based nanomechanical measurements. Ultramicroscopy 106, 466–474.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, M, Liu, L, Xi, N, Wang, Y, Dong, Z, Xiao, X & Zhang, W (2012). Atomic force microscopy imaging and mechanical properties measurement of red blood cells and aggressive cancer cells. Sci China: Life Sci 55, 968–973.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, QS, Lee, GY, Ong, CN & Lim, CT (2008). AFM indentation study of breast cancer cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 374, 609–613.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, KK, Williams, DR & Briscoe, BJ (1998). The large deformation of a single micro-elastomeric sphere. J Phys D: Appl Phys 31(3), 294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mashmoushy, H, Zhang, Z & Thomas, CR (1998). Micromanipulation measurement of the mechanical properties of baker's yeast cells. Biotechnol Tech 12, 925–929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mercadé-Prieto, R & Zhang, Z (2012). Mechanical characterization of microspheres—capsules, cells and beads: A review. J Microencapsul 29, 277–285.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mikoliunaite, L, Makaraviciute, A, Suchodolskis, A, Ramanaviciene, A, Oztekin, Y, Stirke, A, Jurkaite, G, Ukanis, M, Carac, G, Cojocaru, P & Ramanavicius, A (2011). Atomic force microscopy study of living baker's yeast cells. Adv Sci Lett 4(2), 368–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morkvenaite-Vilkonciene, I, Ramanaviciene, A & Ramanavicius, A (2016). 9, 10-Phenanthrenequinone as a redox mediator for the imaging of yeast cells by scanning electrochemical microscopy. Sens Actuators, B 228, 200–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pelling, AE, Sehati, S, Gralla, EB, Valentine, JS & Gimzewski, JK (2004). Local nanomechanical motion of the cell wall of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science 305, 1147–1150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ramanavicius, A, Andriukonis, E, Stirke, A, Mikoliunaite, L, Balevicius, Z & Ramanaviciene, A (2016). Synthesis of polypyrrole within the cell wall of yeast by redox-cycling of [Fe (CN)6]3−/[Fe (CN)6]4−. Enzyme Microb Technol 83, 40–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramanavicius, A, Morkvenaite-Vilkonciene, I, Kisieliute, A, Petroniene, J & Ramanaviciene, A (2017). Scanning electrochemical microscopy based evaluation of influence of pH on bioelectrochemical activity of yeast cells—Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Colloids Surf, B 149, 1–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scariot, FJ, Jahn, LM, Maianti, JP, Delamare, APL & Echeverrigaray, S (2016). The fungicide Mancozeb induces metacaspase-dependent apoptotic cell death in Saccharomyces cerevisiae BY4741. Apoptosis 21, 866–872.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shen, Y, Nakajima, M, Ahmad, MR, Kojima, S, Homma, M & Fukuda, T (2011). Effect of ambient humidity on the strength of the adhesion force of single yeast cell inside environmental-SEM. Ultramicroscopy 111, 1176–1183.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sneddon, IN (1965). The relation between load and penetration in the axisymmetric Boussinesq problem for a punch of arbitrary profile. Int J Eng Sci 3, 47–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stirke, A, Celiesiute-Germaniene, R, Zimkus, A, Zurauskiene, N, Simonis, P, Dervinis, A, Ramanavicius, A & Balevicius, S (2019). The link between yeast cell wall porosity and plasma membrane permeability after PEF treatment. Sci Rep 9(1), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stirke, A, Zimkus, A, Balevicius, S, Stankevic, V, Ramanaviciene, A, Ramanavicius, A & Zurauskiene, N (2014 a). Permeabilization of yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell walls using nanosecond high power electrical pulses. Appl Phys Lett 105(25), 253701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stirke, A, Zimkus, A, Ramanaviciene, A, Balevicius, S, Zurauskiene, N, Saulis, G, Chaustova, L, Stankevic, V & Ramanavicius, A (2014 b). Electric field-induced effects on yeast cell wall permeabilization. Bioelectromagnetics 35(2), 136–144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suchodolskis, A, Feiza, V, Stirke, A, Timonina, A, Ramanaviciene, A & Ramanavicius, A (2011). Elastic properties of chemically modified baker's yeast cells studied by AFM. Surf Interface Anal 43, 1636–1640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sugiura, H, Sakuma, S, Kaneko, M & Arai, F (2015). On-chip method to measure mechanical characteristics of a single cell by using moiré fringe. Micromachines 6, 660–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sugiura, H, Sakuma, S, Kaneko, M & Arai, F (2017). Large indentation method to measure elasticity of cell in robot-integrated microfluidic chip. IEEE Robot Autom Lett 2, 2002–2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toyota, K, Tanaka, R & Okajima, T (2020). Stiffness of brewers’ yeast under ethanol stress investigated by atomic force microscopy. Jpn J Appl Phys 59, SN1005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valiūnienė, A, Petronienė, J, Dulkys, M & Ramanavičius, A (2020). Investigation of active and inactivated yeast cells by scanning electrochemical impedance microscopy. Electroanalysis 32(2), 367–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varela, C, Cárdenas, J, Melo, F & Agosin, E (2005). Quantitative analysis of wine yeast gene expression profiles under winemaking conditions. Yeast 22, 369–383.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Velegol, SB & Logan, BE (2002). Contributions of bacterial surface polymers, electrostatics, and cell elasticity to the shape of AFM force curves. Langmuir 18, 5256–5262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warnat, S, King, H, Forbrigger, C & Hubbard, T (2015). PolyMUMPs MEMS device to measure mechanical stiffness of single cells in aqueous media. J Micromech Microeng 25, 025011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xue, C, Wang, J, Zhao, Y, Chen, D, Yue, W & Chen, J (2015). Constriction channel based single-cell mechanical property characterization. Micromachines 6, 1794–1804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yin, H, Killeen, K, Brennen, R, Sobek, D, Werlich, M & van de Goor, T (2005). Microfluidic chip for peptide analysis with an integrated HPLC column, sample enrichment column, and nanoelectrospray tip. Anal Chem 77, 527–533.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zheng, XR & Zhang, X (2011). Microsystems for cellular force measurement: A review. J Micromech Microeng 21, 054003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar