Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T19:48:51.585Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Experimental Characterization and Mitigation of Specimen Charging on Thin Films with One Conducting Layer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2004

Kenneth H. Downing ,
M.R. McCartney  and
Robert M. Glaeser
Kenneth H. Downing
Affiliation:
Life Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720-0001, USA
M.R. McCartney
Affiliation:
Center for Solid State Science, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-1704, USA
Robert M. Glaeser
Affiliation:
Life Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720-0001, USA Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, Stanley/Donner ASU, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3206, USA
Get access

Abstract

Specimen charging may be one of the most significant factors that contribute to the high variability and generally low quality of images in cryo-electron microscopy. Understanding the nature of specimen charging can help in devising methods to reduce or even avoid its effects and thus improve the rate of data collection as well as the quality of the data. We describe a series of experiments that help to characterize the charging phenomenon, which has been termed the Berriman effect. The pattern of buildup and disappearance of the charge pattern has led to several suggestions for how to alleviate the effect. Experiments are described that demonstrate the feasibility of such charge mitigation.

Keywords

specimen chargingthin filmscryomicroscopyelectron crystallography
Type
Research Article
Information
Microscopy and Microanalysis , Volume 10 , Issue 6 , December 2004 , pp. 783 - 789
Copyright
© 2004 Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Brink, J., Gross, H., Tittmann, P., Sherman, M.B., & Chiu, W. (1998a). Reduction of charging in protein electron cryomicroscopy. J Microsc 191, 67–73.Google Scholar
Brink, J., Sherman, M., Berriman, J., & Chiu, W. (1998b). Evaluation of charging on macromolecules in electron cryomicroscopy. Ultramicroscopy 72, 41–52.Google Scholar
Ehrenberg, W. & Gibbons, D. (1981). Electron Bombardment Induced Conductivity. New York: Academic Press.
Glaeser, R.M. & Downing, K.H. (2004). Specimen charging on thin films with one conducting layer: Discussion of physical principles. Microsc Microanal 10, 790–796 (this issue).Google Scholar
Holt, D.B. (2000). The remote electron beam-induced current analysis of grain boundaries in semiconducting and semi-insulating materials. Scanning 22, 28–51.Google Scholar
Jakubowski, U., Baumeister, W., & Glaeser, R.M. (1989). Evaporated carbon stabilizes thin, frozen-hydrated specimens. Ultramicroscopy 31, 351–356.Google Scholar
Rader, R.S. & Lamvik, M.K. (1992). High-conductivity amorphous TiSi substrates for low-temperature electron microscopy. J Microsc 168, 71–77.Google Scholar
Tolmachev, A.I. (1994). On the energy distribution of sputtered atoms at normal ion incidence. Nucl Instrum Meth Phys Res B 93, 415–420.Google Scholar
Toth, M., Phillips, M., Craven, J., Thiel, B., & Donald, A. (2002). Electric fields produced by electron irradiation of insulators in a low vacuum environment. J Appl Phys 91, 4492–4499.Google Scholar