Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T04:39:02.142Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fluoronanogold: An Efficient Labeling Reagent for Immunocytochemistry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

J.M. Robinson*
Affiliation:
Department of Cell Biology, Neurobiology, and Anatomy, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH43210
Get access

Extract

The field of immunocytochemistry comprises a large body of methodologies whose purpose is to obtain spatial and temporal information about biological samples with a high degree of chemical specificity. The major differences in immunocytochemical methods are: (1) type of sample preparation (i.e., pre-embedding or post-embedding) and (2) type of detection system (i.e., chromogenic, fluorochromes, or particulate). The history of advances in immunocytochemistry can be understood, to a large extent, through the development of the various detection systems. All of these labeling systems have their appropriate applications and are in use today.

The introduction of colloidal gold as a particulate immunoprobe revolutionized immunocytochemistry, particularly at the ultrastructural level. The fact that these probes are discrete particles that are electron dense contributes to their wide acceptance. Due to the particulate nature of these probes, labeling density over a given structure or region of a cell can be determined by simple counting procedures.

Type
Recent Advances in Labeling Techniques
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References:

1.Griffiths, G. and Hoppler, H.. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 34 (1986)1389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Howell, K.E. et al., Eur. J. Cell Biol. 44 (1987)318.Google Scholar
3.Dulhunty, A.F. et al., J. Histochem. Cytochem. 41 (1993)1459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Slot, J.W. et al., Am. J. Anat. 189 (1989)271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Takizawa, T. and Robinson, J.M.. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 42 (1994)1615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Baschong, W. et al., Histochemistry. 83(1985)409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.DeValck, V. et al., Histochemistry. 95(1991)483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Plas, P. Van de and Leunissen, J.L.M.. Meth. Cell Biol. 37 (1993)241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Hainfeld, J.F.. Science. 263 (1987)450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Hainfeld, J.F. and Furuya, F.R.. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 40 (1992)177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Robinson, J.M. and Vandre, D.D.. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 45 (1997)631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Powell, R.D. et al., J. Histochem. Cytochem. 45 (1997)947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar