Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T12:18:28.036Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Impact of Charging on Low-Energy Electron Beam Lithography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2004

Lau Kien Mun ,
Dominique Drouin ,
Eric Lavallée  and
Jacques Beauvais
Lau Kien Mun
Affiliation:
Quantiscript Inc., 2500 boul. Universitété Sherbrooke, Québec J1K 2R1, Canada
Dominique Drouin
Affiliation:
Quantiscript Inc., 2500 boul. Universitété Sherbrooke, Québec J1K 2R1, Canada
Eric Lavallée
Affiliation:
Quantiscript Inc., 2500 boul. Universitété Sherbrooke, Québec J1K 2R1, Canada
Jacques Beauvais
Affiliation:
Quantiscript Inc., 2500 boul. Universitété Sherbrooke, Québec J1K 2R1, Canada
Get access

Abstract

A major issue in low voltage lithography is surface charging, which results in beam deflection presented as uneven exposure between adjacent structures. In this study, charge-induced pattern distortions in low-voltage energy beam lithography (LVEBL) were investigated using a silicide direct-write electron beam lithography process. Two methodologies have been proposed to avert charging effects in LVEBL, namely, pattern randomizing and lithography using the crossover voltage. Experimental results demonstrated that these methods are effective in significantly reducing the problems associated with charging. They indicate that charging on a sample is a function of time interval and proximity between line structures. In addition, the optimum time and distance between exposures for no charge-induced pattern distortion were determined. By using the crossover voltage of the material for lithography, charging effect can be significantly minimized.

Keywords

scanning electron microscopeLVEBLcharge-induced distortioncrossover voltagesilicideX-ray mask
Type
Research Article
Information
Microscopy and Microanalysis , Volume 10 , Issue 6 , December 2004 , pp. 804 - 809
Copyright
© 2004 Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bai, M., Pease, R.F.W., Tanasa, C., McCord, M.A., Pickard, D.S., & Meisburger, D. (1999). Charging and discharging of electron beam resist films. J Vac Sci Technol B 17, 2893–2896.Google Scholar
Cazaux, J. (1986). Some considerations on the electric field induced in insulators by electron bombardment. J Appl Phys 59, 1418–1430.Google Scholar
Chang, T.H.P., Thomson, M.G.R., Kratschmer, E., Kim, H.S., Yu, M.L., Lee, K.Y., Rishton, S.A., Hussey, B.W., & Zolgharnain, S. (1996). Electron-beam microcolumns for lithography and related applications. J Vac Sci Technol B 14, 3774–3781.Google Scholar
Drouin, D., Beauvais, B., Lavallée, E., Michel, S., Mouine, J., & Gauvin, R. (1997). Resistless electron beam lithography process for the fabrication of sub-50 nm silicide structures. J Vac Sci Technol B 15, 2269–2273.Google Scholar
Goldstein, J.I., Newbury, D.E., Echlin, P., Joy, D.J., Romig, A.D., Jr., Lyman, C.E., Fiori, C., & Lifshin, E. (1992). Scanning Electron Microscopy and X-Ray Microanalysis. New York: Plenum Publishing Corp.
Ingino, J., Owen, G., Berglund, C.N., Browning, R., & Pease, R.F.W. (1994). Workpiece charging in electron beam lithography. J Vac Sci Technol B 12, 1367–1371.Google Scholar
Lavallée, E., Beauvais, J., Drouin, D., & Corbin, J. (2000). Study of the effect of layer thickness, beam energy, and metal density on the resistless silicide direct-write electron-beam lithography process for the fabrication of nanostructures. J Vac Sci Technol A 18, 681–684.Google Scholar
Lee, Y., Lee, W., & Chun, K. (2000). Calculation of surface potential and beam deflection due to charging effects in electron beam lithography. J Vac Sci Technol B 18, 3095–3098.Google Scholar
Liu, W., Ingino, J., & Pease, R.F. (1995). Resist charging in electron beam lithography. J Vac Sci Technol B 13, 1979–1983.Google Scholar
Masatoshi, K. (2001). Simulation of time-dependent charging of resist on Si under electron-beam irradiation. J Vac Sci Technol B 19, 2516–2519.Google Scholar
Murray, L.P., Spallas, J.P., Steber, C., Lee, K., Mankos, M., Hsu, Y., Gmur, M., & Chang, T.H.P. (2000). Advances in arrayed microcolumn lithography. J Vac Sci Technol B 18, 3099–3104.Google Scholar
Shaffner, T.J. & Van Veld, R.D. (1971). “Charging” effects in scanning electron microscope. J Phys E Sci, Instrum 4, 633–637.Google Scholar
Thong, J.T.L., Lee, K.W., & Wong, W.K. (2001). Reduction in charging effects using vector scanning in the scanning electron microscope. Scanning Microsc 23, 395–402.Google Scholar
Utsumi, T. (1999). Low energy electron-beam proximity projection lithography: Discovery of a missing link. J Vac Sci Technol B 17, 2897–2902.Google Scholar
Wong, W.K., Phang, J.C.H., & Thong, J.T.L. (1995). Charging control using pulsed scanning electron microscopy. Scanning Microsc 17, 312–315.Google Scholar