Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T21:48:35.944Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Microstructure and Catalytic Activity of Al13Fe4 and Al13Co4 Melt-Spun Alloys

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2021

Amelia Zięba*
Affiliation:
Institute of Metallurgy and Materials Science, Polish Academy of Sciences, Reymonta 25, 30-059 Kraków, Poland
Katarzyna Stan-Głowińska
Affiliation:
Institute of Metallurgy and Materials Science, Polish Academy of Sciences, Reymonta 25, 30-059 Kraków, Poland
Paweł Czaja
Affiliation:
Institute of Metallurgy and Materials Science, Polish Academy of Sciences, Reymonta 25, 30-059 Kraków, Poland
Łukasz Rogal
Affiliation:
Institute of Metallurgy and Materials Science, Polish Academy of Sciences, Reymonta 25, 30-059 Kraków, Poland
Janusz Przewoźnik
Affiliation:
Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer Science, Department of Solid State Physics, AGH University of Science and Technology, Al. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Krakow, Poland
Dorota Duraczyńska
Affiliation:
Jerzy Haber Institute of Catalysis and Surface Chemistry, Polish Academy of Sciences, Niezapominajek 8, 30-239 Kraków, Poland
Ewa M. Serwicka
Affiliation:
Jerzy Haber Institute of Catalysis and Surface Chemistry, Polish Academy of Sciences, Niezapominajek 8, 30-239 Kraków, Poland
Lidia Lityńska-Dobrzyńska
Affiliation:
Institute of Metallurgy and Materials Science, Polish Academy of Sciences, Reymonta 25, 30-059 Kraków, Poland
*
*Corresponding author: Amelia Zięba, E-mail: a.zieba@imim.pl
Get access

Abstract

Rapidly solidified alloys with a nominal composition of Al76.5Fe23.5 and Al75.8Co24.2 (in at%), corresponding to the Al13Fe4 and Al13Co4 phases, were produced by a melt spinning technique. The microstructure and phase composition of the as-spun and heat-treated ribbons were examined by X-ray diffraction, scanning and transmission electron microscopy. The as-spun ribbons consisted of columnar grains with an average size of 1–2 μm, which increased by a factor of 2 after applied heat treatment. The Al13Fe4 as-spun ribbon comprised of two phases: grains of the Al13Fe4 phase surrounded by solid solution of Al, transformed into a single monoclinic Al13Fe4 phase after annealing. The as-spun Al13Co4 ribbons had a multiphase structure. A decagonal quasicrystalline D-phase, the monoclinic M-Al13Co4 phase, and the Al9Co2 phase were identified in their microstructure. After the heat treatment, the mixture of the orthorhombic O-Al13Co4 phase and grains of monoclinic Y-Al13Co4 were observed. The investigations of catalytic properties were performed for the phenylacetylene hydrogenation reaction using pulverized ribbons in the initial state and after annealing. The degree of conversion was in the range of 8–27% and increased with the increasing reaction temperature. The highest selectivity to styrene was obtained for the Al13Fe4 alloy in the as-spun state.

Type
The XVIIth International Conference on Electron Microscopy (EM2020)
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Armbrüster, M, Kovnir, K, Friedrich, M, Teschner, D, Wowsnick, G, Hahne, M, Gille, P, Szentmiklósi, L, Feuerbacher, M, Heggen, M, Girgsdies, F, Rosenthal, D, Schlögl, R & Grin, Y (2012). Al13Fe4 as a low-cost alternative for palladium in heterogeneous hydrogenation. Nat Mater 11, 690693.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Armbrüster, M, Schlögl, R & Grin, Y (2014). Intermetallic compounds in heterogeneous catalysis - A quickly developing field. Sci Technol Adv Mater 15, 034803.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aviziotis, IG, Duguet, T, Soussi, K, Heggen, M, Lafont, MC, Morfin, F, Mishra, S, Daniele, S, Boudouvis, AG & Vahlas, C (2019). Chemical vapor deposition of Al13Fe4 highly selective catalytic films for the semi-hydrogenation of acetylene. Phys Status Solidi A 215, 1700692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbier, J, Tamura, N & Verger-Gaugry, J (1993). Monoclinic Al13Fe4 approximant phase: A link between icosahedral and decagonal phases. J Non-Cryst Solids 153–154, 126131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chatelier, C, Garreau, Y, Piccolo, L, Vlad, A, Resta, A, Ledieu, J, Fournée, V, De Weerd, MC, Picca, FE, De Boissieu, M, Felici, R, Coati, A & Gaudry, É (2020). From the surface structure to catalytic properties of Al5Co2 (210): A study combining experimental and theoretical approaches. J Phys Chem C 124, 45524562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Czaja, P, Przewoźnik, J, Chulist, R, Stan-Głowińska, K, Rogal, Ł, Wójcik, A, Wierzbicka-Miernik, A, Duraczyńska, D, Serwicka, EM & Lityńska-Dobrzyńska, L (2020). Microstructure and catalytic activity for selective hydrogenation of phenylacetylene of intermetallic Ni70Ga30, Ni70In30, and Ni70Sn30 melt-spun alloys. Intermetallics 122, 106797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleischer, F, Weber, T, Jung, DY & Steurer, W (2010). O′-Al13Co4, a new quasicrystal approximant. J Alloys Compd 500, 153160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freiburg, C, Grushko, B, Wittenberg, R & Reichert, W (1996). Once more about monoclinic Al13Co4. Mater Sci Forum 228-231, 583586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fung, KK, Zou, XD & Yang, CY (1987). Transmission electron microscopy study of Al13Fe4 tenfold twins in rapidly cooled Al-Fe alloys. Philos Mag Lett 55, 2732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaudry, É, Chatelier, C, Loffreda, D, Kandaskalov, D, Coati, A & Piccolo, L (2020). Catalytic activation of a non-noble intermetallic surface through nanostructuration under hydrogenation conditions revealed by atomistic thermodynamics. J Mater Chem A 8, 74227431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grushko, B, Holland-Moritz, D & Bickmann, K (1996). Decagonal quasicrystals in Al-Co and ternary alloys containing Cu and Ni. J Alloys Compd 236, 243252.Google Scholar
Grushko, B, Holland-Moritz, D, Wittmann, R & Wilde, G (1998). Transition between periodic and quasiperiodic structures in Al–Ni–Co. J Alloys Compd 280, 215230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grushko, B, Kowalski, W & Mi, SB (2018). A study of the Al-Co-Cr alloy system. J Alloys Compd 739, 280289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hiraga, K & Yasuhara, A (2013). The structure of an AlCoNi decagonal quasicrystal in an Al72Co8Ni20 alloy studied by Cs-corrected scanning transmission electron microscopy. Mater Trans 54, 720724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krajčí, M & Hafner, J (2011). Complex intermetallic compounds as selective hydrogenation catalysts – A case study for the (100) surface of Al13Co4. J Catal 278, 200207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, X, Scherf, A, Heilmaier, M & Stein, F (2016). The Al-rich part of the Fe-Al phase diagram. J Phase Equilib Diffus 37, 162173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liao, XZ, Kuo, KH, Zhang, H & Urban, K (1992). A new orthorhombic phase in Al-Cu-Co representing a rational approximant to the decagonal quasicrystalline phase. Philos Mag B 66, 549558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lityńska-Dobrzyńska, L, Stan-Głowińska, K, Wójcik, A, Duraczyńska, D & Serwicka, EM (2020). Microstructure and catalytic activity of melt spun Al-Cu-Fe ribbons. Mater Sci Forum 985, 109114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, XL & Kuo, KH (1992). Decagonal quasicrystal and related crystalline phases in slowly solidified Al-Co alloys. Mater Trans A 23, 11211128.Google Scholar
Nakayama, K, Mizutani, A & Koyama, Y (2016). Crystallographic features and state stability of the decagonal quasicrystal in the Al–Co–Cu alloy system. J Phys Soc Jpn 85, 114602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrowska, M & Cacciamani, G (2019). Critical evaluation and thermodynamic modeling of the Al-Co-Fe system. J Alloys Compd 794, 553568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piccolo, L, Chatelier, C, De Weerd, MC, Morfin, F, Ledieu, J, Fournée, V, Gille, P & Gaudry, E (2019). Catalytic properties of Al13TM4 complex intermetallics: Influence of the transition metal and the surface orientation on butadiene hydrogenation. Sci Technol Adv Mater 20, 557567.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Priputen, P, Kusý, M, Drienovský, M, Janičkovič, D, Čička, R, Černičková, I & Janovec, J (2015). Experimental reinvestigation of Al-Co phase diagram in vicinity of Al13Co4 family of phases. J Alloys Compd 647, 486497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritsch, S, Beeli, C, Nissen, HU, Gödecke, T, Scheffer, M & Lück, R (1998). The existence regions of structural modifications in decagonal Al-Co-Ni. Philos Mag Lett 78, 6775.Google Scholar
Saito, K, Sugiyama, K & Hiraga, K (2000). Al13M4-type structures and atomic models of their twins. Mater Sci Eng 294–296, 279282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saitoh, K, Yokosawa, T, Tanaka, M & Tsai, AP (1999). Structural studies of monoclinic approximants of Al13Fe4 and τ 2-inflated Al13Co4 by the high-angle annular dark-field method. J Electron Microsc 48, 105114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, P, Zelenina, I, Ramlau, R, Carrillo-Cabrera, W, Burkhardt, U, Borrmann, H, Gil, RC, Feuerbacher, M, Gille, P & Grin, Y (2020). Structural complexity of the intermetallic compound o-Al13Co4. J Alloys Compd 820, 153363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steurer, W (2012). Why are quasicrystals quasiperiodic? Chem Soc Rev 41, 67196729.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suryanarayana, C & Menon, J (1987). An electron microscopic study of the decagonal phase in a melt-spun the Al-26 wt% Co alloy. Scr Metall 21, 459460.Google Scholar
Wardé, M, Herinx, M, Ledieu, J, Serkovic Loli, LN, Fournée, V, Gille, P, Le Moal, S & Barthés-Labrousse, MG (2015). Adsorption of O2 and C2 Hn (n = 2, 4, 6) on the Al9Co2 (001) and O-Al13Co4 (100) complex metallic alloy surfaces. Appl Surf Sci 357, 16661675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zienert, T & Fabrichnaya, O (2018). Experimental investigation and thermodynamic assessment of the Al-Fe system. J Alloys Compd 743, 795811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar