Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T08:20:48.358Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Phases in the Al-Corner of the Al–Mn–Be System

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 June 2013

Franc Zupanič*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Maribor, Smetanova ulica 17, SI-2000 Maribor, Slovenia
Boštjan Markoli
Affiliation:
Faculty of Natural Sciences and Engineering, University of Ljubljana, Aškerčeva 12, SI-1000, Slovenia
Iztok Naglič
Affiliation:
Faculty of Natural Sciences and Engineering, University of Ljubljana, Aškerčeva 12, SI-1000, Slovenia
Tobias Weingärtner
Affiliation:
Institute for Applied Materials – Applied Materials Physics (IAM-AWP), Karslruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Herrmann-von-Helmholtz-Platz 1, 76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany
Anton Meden
Affiliation:
Faculty of Chemistry and Chemical Technology, University of Ljubljana, Aškerčeva 5, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
Tonica Bončina
Affiliation:
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Maribor, Smetanova ulica 17, SI-2000 Maribor, Slovenia
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: franc.zupanic@um.si
Get access

Abstract

This work studied the phases in the Al corner of the Al–Mn–Be phase diagram in the as-cast state and heat-treated conditions. Metallographic investigations, X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, and energy-dispersive spectroscopy were used for identifying the phases. The Be contents in the identified phases were precisely determined using Auger electron spectroscopy. The results indicated that Al6Mn does not dissolve Be, whilst λ-Al4Mn dissolves up to 7 at.% Be. The average composition of the T phase, which is normally designated as Al15Mn3Be2, was 72 at.% Al, 19 at.% Mn, and 9 at.% Be. The phase with the nominal composition Be4AlMn contained more Al than Mn. The atomic ratio Al:Mn was between 1.3:1 and 2:1. The hexagonal Be-rich phase did not dissolve any Al and Mn. The icosahedral quasicrystalline (IQC) phase contained up to 45 at.% Be. The compositions of T phase, λ–Al4Mn, IQC, and Be4AlMn may vary, however, the ratio (Al + Be):Mn remained constant, and was close either to four or six indicating substitution of Al atoms with Be atoms in these phases.

Type
Materials Applications
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boncina, T., Markoli, B. & Zupanic, F. (2009). Characterization of cast Al86Mn3Be11 alloy. J Microsc Oxf 233(3), 364371.Google Scholar
Carrabine, J.A. (1963). Ternary AlMnBe4 phases in commercially pure beryllium. J Nucl Mater 8, 278280.Google Scholar
Doyle, Z. & McDaniel, F.D. (2003). Auger electron spectroscopy. In Characterisation of Materials, Kaufmann, E.N. (Ed.), pp. 11571174. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc. Google Scholar
Goldstein, J.I., Newbury, D.E., Echlin, P., Joy, D.C., Fiori, C. & Lifshin, E. (1981). Scanning Electron Microscopy and Microanalysis. New York, London: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Grushko, B. & Balanetskyy, S. (2008). A study of phase equilibria in the Al-rich part of the Al-Mn alloy system. Int J Mater Res 99, 13191323.Google Scholar
Kim, S.H., Song, G.S., Fleury, E., Chattopadhyay, K., Kim, W.T. & Kim, D.H. (2002). Icosahedral quasicrystalline and hexagonal approximant phases in the Al-Mn-Be alloy system. Philos Mag A 82(8), 14951508.Google Scholar
Kreiner, G. & Franzen, H.F. (1997). The crystal structure of lambda-Al4Mn. J Alloy Compd 261(1-2), 83104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markoli, B., Boncina, T. & Zupanic, F. (2012). Behaviour of a quasicrystalline strengthened Al-alloy during compression testing. Materialwiss Werkstofftech 43(4), 340344.Google Scholar
McAlister, A. & Murray, J. (1990). Al-Mn (aluminum-manganese). In Binary Alloy Phase Diagrams, Massalski, T. (Ed.), pp. 171174. Materials Park, OH: ASM International.Google Scholar
Murray, J. & Kahan, D. (1990). Al-Be (aluminum-beryllium). In Binary Alloy Phase Diagrams, Massalski, T. (Ed.), pp. 125127. Materials Park, OH: ASM International.Google Scholar
Okamoto, H. & Tanner, L. (1990). Be-Mn (beryllium-manganese). In Binary Alloy Phase Diagrams, Massalski, T. (Ed.), pp. 665667. Materials Park, OH: ASM International.Google Scholar
Pan, Z., Du, Y., Huang, B.Y., Liu, Y. & Wang, R.C. (2004). A thermodynamic description of the Al-Be system: Modeling and experiment. Calphad-Comput CouplingPhase Diagrams Thermochem 28(4), 371378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raynor, G.V., Faulkner, C.R., Noden, J.D. & Harding, A.R. (1953). Ternary alloys formed by aluminium, transitional metals and divalent metals. Acta Metall 1, 629648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shukla, A. & Pelton, A. (2009). Thermodynamic assessment of the Al-Mn and Mg-Al-Mn systems. J Phase Equilib Diffus 30(1), 2839.Google Scholar
Trambly de Laissardière, G., Nguyen-Manh, D. & Mayou, D. (2005). Electronic structure of complex Hume-Rothery phases and quasicrystals in transition metal aluminides. Prog Mater Sci 50(6), 679788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zupanic, F., Markoli, B., Naglic, I. & Boncina, T. (2013). The experimental investigation of phase equilibria in the Al-rich corner within the ternary Al-Mn-Be system. J Alloys Compd 570, 125132.Google Scholar