Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T20:02:33.411Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Quantitative Method for Microtubule Analysis in Fluorescence Images

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 September 2015

Xiaodong Lan ,
Lingfei Li ,
Jiongyu Hu ,
Qiong Zhang ,
Yongming Dang  and
Yuesheng Huang
Xiaodong Lan
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Trauma, Burns and Combined Injury, Institute of Burn Research, Southwest Hospital, The Third Military Medical University, Chongqing 400038, China
Lingfei Li
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Trauma, Burns and Combined Injury, Institute of Burn Research, Southwest Hospital, The Third Military Medical University, Chongqing 400038, China
Jiongyu Hu
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Trauma, Burns and Combined Injury, Institute of Burn Research, Southwest Hospital, The Third Military Medical University, Chongqing 400038, China
Qiong Zhang
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Trauma, Burns and Combined Injury, Institute of Burn Research, Southwest Hospital, The Third Military Medical University, Chongqing 400038, China
Yongming Dang*
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Trauma, Burns and Combined Injury, Institute of Burn Research, Southwest Hospital, The Third Military Medical University, Chongqing 400038, China
Yuesheng Huang*
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Trauma, Burns and Combined Injury, Institute of Burn Research, Southwest Hospital, The Third Military Medical University, Chongqing 400038, China
*
*Corresponding authors. yshuangtmmu@163.com; dymzy@qq.com
*Corresponding authors. yshuangtmmu@163.com; dymzy@qq.com
Get access

Abstract

Microtubule analysis is of significant value for a better understanding of normal and pathological cellular processes. Although immunofluorescence microscopic techniques have proven useful in the study of microtubules, comparative results commonly rely on a descriptive and subjective visual analysis. We developed an objective and quantitative method based on image processing and analysis of fluorescently labeled microtubular patterns in cultured cells. We used a multi-parameter approach by analyzing four quantifiable characteristics to compose our quantitative feature set. Then we interpreted specific changes in the parameters and revealed the contribution of each feature set using principal component analysis. In addition, we verified that different treatment groups could be clearly discriminated using principal components of the multi-parameter model. High predictive accuracy of four commonly used multi-classification methods confirmed our method. These results demonstrated the effectiveness and efficiency of our method in the analysis of microtubules in fluorescence images. Application of the analytical methods presented here provides information concerning the organization and modification of microtubules, and could aid in the further understanding of structural and functional aspects of microtubules under normal and pathological conditions.

Keywords

microtubulequantitative analysisprincipal components analysiscell cultureconfocal imaging
Type
Equipment and Techniques Development
Information
Microscopy and Microanalysis , Volume 21 , Issue 6 , December 2015 , pp. 1582 - 1590
Copyright
© Microscopy Society of America 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Angelsky, O.V., Demianovsky, G.V., Ushenko, A.G., Burkovets, D.N. & Ushenko, Y.A. (2004). Wavelet analysis of two-dimensional birefringence images of architectonics in biotissues for diagnosing pathological changes. J Biomed Opt 9, 679–690.Google Scholar
Applegate, K.T., Besson, S., Matov, A., Bagonis, M.H., Jaqaman, K. & Danuser, G. (2011). plusTipTracker: Quantitative image analysis software for the measurement of microtubule dynamics. J Struct Biol 176, 168–184.Google Scholar
Bansal, A., Bajpai, R. & Saini, J.P. ( 2007). Simulation of image enhancement techniques using Matlab. First Asia International Conference on Modelling & Simulation, AMS ’07, 27–30 March 2007, Mathura, India, pp. 296–301.Google Scholar
Buno, I., Juarranz, A., Canete, M., Villanueva, A., Gosalvez, J. & Stockert, J.C. (1998). Image processing and analysis of fluorescent labelled cytoskeleton. Micron 29, 445–449.Google Scholar
Calligaris, D., Verdier-Pinard, P., Devred, F., Villard, C., Braguer, D. & Lafitte, D. (2010). Microtubule targeting agents: From biophysics to proteomics. Cell Mol Life Sci 67, 1089–1104.Google Scholar
Dang, Y., Lan, X., Zhang, Q., Li, L. & Huang, Y. (2015). Analysis of grayscale characteristics in images of labeled microtubules from cultured cardiac myocytes. Microsc Microanal 21(1), 1–9.Google Scholar
de Forges, H., Bouissou, A. & Perez, F. (2012). Interplay between microtubule dynamics and intracellular organization. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 44, 266–274.Google Scholar
Desai, A. & Mitchison, T.J. (1997). Microtubule polymerization dynamics. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 13, 83–117.Google Scholar
Detrich, H.W. 3rd, Parker, S.K., Williams, R.C. Jr., Nogales, E. & Downing, K.H. (2000). Cold adaptation of microtubule assembly and dynamics. Structural interpretation of primary sequence changes present in the alpha- and beta-tubulins of Antarctic fishes. J Biol Chem 275, 37038–37047.Google Scholar
Gonzales, R.C. & Woods, R.E. (2007). Digital Image Processing, 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Haralick, R.M., Shanmugam, K. & Dinstein, I.H. (1973). Textural features for image classification. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern SMC–3, 610–621.Google Scholar
Hua, R., Liu, Y. & Li, S. (1999). The application of wavelet transform in medical image processing. Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi 23, 281–283, 290.Google Scholar
Huang, K. & Aviyente, S. (2008). Wavelet feature selection for image classification. IEEE Trans Image Process 17, 1709–1720.Google Scholar
Lee, S.J. (2014). Dynamic regulation of the microtubule and actin cytoskeleton in zebrafish epiboly. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 452, 1–7.Google Scholar
Liu, W. & Ralston, E. (2014). A new directionality tool for assessing microtubule pattern alterations. Cytoskeleton (Hoboken) 71, 230–240.Google Scholar
Lu, Y., Huang, C., Wang, J. & Shang, P. (2014). An improved quantitative analysis method for plant cortical microtubules. Sci World J 2014, 637183.Google Scholar
Mojsilovic, A., Popovic, M.V., Neskovic, A.N. & Popovic, A.D. (1997). Wavelet image extension for analysis and classification of infarcted myocardial tissue. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 44, 856–866.Google Scholar
Nazeran, H., Rice, F., Moran, W. & Skinner, J. (1995). Biomedical image processing in pathology: A review. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 18, 26–38.Google Scholar
Neskovic, A.N., Mojsilovic, A., Jovanovic, T., Vasiljevic, J., Popovic, M., Marinkovic, J., Bojic, M. & Popovic, A.D. (1998). Myocardial tissue characterization after acute myocardial infarction with wavelet image decomposition: A novel approach for the detection of myocardial viability in the early postinfarction period. Circulation 98, 634–641.Google Scholar
Olmsted, J.B. & Borisy, G.G. (1973). Microtubules. Annu Rev Biochem 42, 507–540.Google Scholar
Parker, A.L., Kavallaris, M. & McCarroll, J.A. (2014). Microtubules and their role in cellular stress in cancer. Front Oncol 4, 153.Google Scholar
Rigaut, J.P. & Vassy, J. (1991). High-resolution three-dimensional images from confocal scanning laser microscopy. Quantitative study and mathematical correction of the effects from bleaching and fluorescence attenuation in depth. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 13, 223–232.Google Scholar
Roberts, K. (1974). Cytoplasmic microtubules and their functions. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 28, 371–420.Google Scholar
Schatten, G., Bestor, T., Balczon, R., Henson, J. & Schatten, H. (1985). Intracellular pH shift leads to microtubule assembly and microtubule-mediated motility during sea urchin fertilization: Correlations between elevated intracellular pH and microtubule activity and depressed intracellular pH and microtubule disassembly. Eur J Cell Biol 36, 116–127.Google Scholar
Song, H., Shang, Y., Hou, X. & Han, B. ( 2011). Research on image enhancement algorithms based on Matlab. 2011 4th International Congress on Image and Signal Processing (CISP), 15–17 October 2011, Beijing, China, pp. 733–736.Google Scholar
Uchida, S. (2013). Image processing and recognition for biological images. Dev Growth Differ 55, 523–549.Google Scholar
Ujihara, Y., Nakamura, M., Miyazaki, H. & Wada, S. (2013). Segmentation and morphometric analysis of cells from fluorescence microscopy images of cytoskeletons. Comput Math Methods Med 2013, 381356.Google Scholar
van der Vaart, B., Akhmanova, A. & Straube, A. (2009). Regulation of microtubule dynamic instability. Biochem Soc Trans 37, 1007–1013.Google Scholar
Vassy, J., Beil, M., Irinopoulou, T. & Rigaut, J.P. (1996). Quantitative image analysis of cytokeratin filament distribution during fetal rat liver development. Hepatology 23, 630–638.Google Scholar
Wang, X.-Y., Wu, J.-F. & Yang, H.-Y. (2010). Robust image retrieval based on color histogram of local feature regions. Multimed Tools Appl 49, 323–345.Google Scholar
White, E. (2011). Mechanical modulation of cardiac microtubules. Pflugers Arch 462, 177–184.Google Scholar
Xiaozhu, L., Junwei, J. & Yingying, G. (2007). The Euler number study of image and its application. 2nd IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications, ICIEA 2007, 23–25 May 2007, Beijing, China, pp. 910–912.Google Scholar
Xu, X., Zhang, Q., Hu, J.Y., Zhang, D.X., Jiang, X.P., Jia, J.Z., Zhu, J.C. & Huang, Y.S. (2013 a). Phosphorylation of DYNLT1 at serine 82 regulates microtubule stability and mitochondrial permeabilization in hypoxia. Mol Cells 36, 322–332.Google Scholar
Xu, Y., Jiao, L., Wang, S., Wei, J., Fan, Y., Lai, M. & Chang, E.I. (2013 b). Multi-label classification for colon cancer using histopathological images. Microsc Res Tech 76, 1266–1277.Google Scholar
Yao, Y.H., Xiong, J.H., Liang, Z.G., Yan, H. & Li, Y.H. (2004). Gray characteristic analysis of microtubules in cardiac myocytes. Space Med Med Eng (Beijing) 17, 322–325.Google Scholar
Yao, Y.H., Yan, H. & Xiong, J.H. (2003). Image analysis of cardiac muscle cytoskeleton under simulated microgravity based on gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM). Space Med Med Eng (Beijing) 16, 422–425.Google Scholar
Zhang, Y., Wang, G., Teng, C., Sun, Z. & Wang, J. (2014). The analysis of hand movement distinction based on relative frequency band energy method. Biomed Res Int 2014, 781769.Google Scholar