Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:47:44.090Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Texture Analyses Show Synergetic Effects of Biomechanical and Biochemical Stimulation on Mesenchymal Stem Cell Differentiation into Early Phase Osteoblasts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 November 2013

So Hee Park ,
Ji Won Shin ,
Yun Gyeong Kang ,
Jin-Sook Hyun ,
Min Jae Oh  and
Jung-Woog Shin
So Hee Park
Affiliation:
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Inje University, Gimhae, Gyeongnam, 621-749, Korea
Ji Won Shin
Affiliation:
Cardiovascular and Metabolic Disease Center, Inje University, Busan, 633-165, Korea
Yun Gyeong Kang
Affiliation:
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Inje University, Gimhae, Gyeongnam, 621-749, Korea
Jin-Sook Hyun
Affiliation:
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Inje University, Gimhae, Gyeongnam, 621-749, Korea
Min Jae Oh
Affiliation:
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Inje University, Gimhae, Gyeongnam, 621-749, Korea
Jung-Woog Shin*
Affiliation:
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Inje University, Gimhae, Gyeongnam, 621-749, Korea Cardiovascular and Metabolic Disease Center, Inje University, Busan, 633-165, Korea Institute of Aged Life Redesign/UHRC, Inje University, Gimhae, Gyeongnam, 621-749, Korea
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: biomechshin@gmail.com
Get access

Abstract

We investigated the structural complexity and texture of the cytoskeleton and nucleus in human mesenchymal stem cells during early phase differentiation into osteoblasts according to the differentiation–induction method: mechanical and/or chemical stimuli. For this, fractal dimension and a number of parameters utilizing the gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) were calculated based on single-cell images after confirmation of differentiation by immunofluorescence staining. The F-actin and nuclear fractal dimensions were greater in both stimulus groups compared with the control group. The GLCM values for energy and homogeneity were lower in fibers of the F-actin cytoskeleton, indicating a dispersed F-actin arrangement during differentiation. In the nuclei of both stimulus groups, higher values for energy and homogeneity were calculated, indicating that the chromatin arrangement was chaotic during the early phase of differentiation. It was shown and confirmed that combined stimulation with mechanical and chemical factors accelerated differentiation, even in the early phase. Fractal dimension analysis and GLCM methods have the potential to provide a framework for further investigation of stem cell differentiation.

Keywords

mesenchymal stem cellsdifferentiationbiomimetic environmentscytoskeletonnucleusfractal dimensiongray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM)
Type
Biological Applications
Information
Microscopy and Microanalysis , Volume 20 , Issue 1 , February 2014 , pp. 219 - 227
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bai, K., Huang, Y., Jia, X., Fan, Y. & Wang, W. (2010). Endothelium oriented differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells under chemical and mechanical stimulations. J Biomech 43, 1176–1181.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Born, A.K., Rottmar, M., Lischer, S., Pleskova, M., Bruinink, A. & Maniura-Weber, K. (2009). Correlating cell architecture with osteogenesis: First steps towards live single cell monitoring. Eur Cell Mater 18, 49–60.Google Scholar
Dahl, K.N., Ribeiro, A.J. & Lammerding, J. (2008). Nuclear shape, mechanics, and mechanotransduction. Circ Res 102, 1307–1318.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Engler, A.J., Sen, S., Sweeney, H.L. & Discher, D.E. (2006). Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell 126, 677–689.Google Scholar
Fuseler, J.W., Millette, C.F., Davis, J.M. & Carver, W. (2007). Fractal and image analysis of morphological changes in the actin cytoskeleton of neonatal cardiac fibroblasts in response to mechanical stretch. Microsc Microanal 13, 133–143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ghazanfari, S., Tafazzoli-Shadpour, M. & Shokrgozar, M.A. (2009). Effects of cyclic stretch on proliferation of mesenchymal stem cells and their differentiation to smooth muscle cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 388, 601–605.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haralick, R.M., Shanmugam, K. & Dinstein, I. (1973). Textural features for image classification. IEEE Trans SMC-3, 610–621.Google Scholar
Joffe, B., Leonhardt, H. & Solovei, I. (2010). Differentiation and large scale spatial organization of the genome. Curr Opin Genet Dev 20, 562–569.Google Scholar
Kearney, E.M., Farrell, E., Prendergast, P.J. & Campbell, V.A. (2010). Tensile strain as a regulator of mesenchymal stem cell osteogenesis. Ann Biomed Eng 38, 1767–1779.Google Scholar
Kim, J.H., Cho, C.S., Chung, Y.H., Lim, K., Son, H., Seonwoo, H., Baik, S., Jeon, S., Park, J., Choung, P. & Chung, J. (2009). Mechanical stimulation of mesenchymal stem cells for tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Regen Med 6, 199–206.Google Scholar
Kolf, C.M., Cho, E. & Tuan, R.S. (2007). Biology of adult mesenchymal stem cells: Regulation of niche, self-renewal and differentiation. Arthritis Res Ther 9, 204–214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liao, S., Chan, C.K. & Ramakrishna, S. (2008). Stem cells and biomimetic materials strategies for tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng C 28, 1189–1202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loganathan, R., Potetz, B.R., Rongish, B.J. & Little, C.D. (2012). Spatial anisotropies and temporal fluctuations in extracellular matrix network texture during early embryogenesis. PLoS ONE 7, e38266. CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Losa, G.A. & Castelli, C. (2005). Nuclear patterns of human breast cancer cells during apoptosis: Characterisation by fractal dimension and co-occurrence matrix statistics. Cell Tissue Res 322, 257–267.Google Scholar
Mathieu, P.S. & Loboa, E.G. (2012). Cytoskeletal and focal adhesion influences on mesenchymal stem cell shape, mechanical properties, and differentiation down osteogenic, adipogenic, and chondrogenic pathway. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 18, 436–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metze, K. (2010). Fractal dimension of chromatin and cancer prognosis. Epigenomics 2, 601–604.Google Scholar
Mohd Khuzi, A., Besar, R., Wan Zaki, W. & Ahmad, N. (2009). Identification of masses in digital mammogram using gray level co-occurrence matrices. Biomed Imaging Interv J 5, e17. Google Scholar
Morandi, F., Raffaghello, L., Bianchi, G., Meloni, F., Salis, A., Millo, E., Ferrone, S., Barnaba, V. & Pistoia, V. (2008). Immunogenicity of human mesenchymal stem cells in HLA-class I restricted T cell responses against viral or tumor-associated antigens. Stem Cells 26, 1275–1287.Google Scholar
Pantic, I. & Pantic, S. (2012). Germinal center texture entropy as possible indicator of humoral immune response: Immunophysiology viewpoint. Mol Imaging Biol 14, 534–540.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pantic, I., Pantic, S. & Basta-Jovanovic, G. (2012). Gray level co-occurrence matrix texture analysis of germinal center light zone lymphocyte nuclei: Physiology viewpoint with focus on apoptosis. Microsc Microanal 18, 470–475.Google Scholar
Qi, Y., Wang, X., Zhang, P. & Jiang, Z. (2010). Fractal and image analysis of cytoskeletal F-actin organization in endothelial cells under shear stress and rho-GDIα knock down. IFMBE 31, 1051–1054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qian, A.R., Li, D., Han, J., Gao, X., Di, S.M., Zhang, W., Hu, L.F. & Shang, P. (2012). Fractal dimension as a measure of altered actin cytoskeleton in MC3T3-E1 cells under simulated microgravity using 3-D/2-D clinostats. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 59, 1374–1380.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, J.P., González, M., Ríos, S. & Cambiazo, V. (2004). Cytoskeletal organization of human mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) changes during their osteogenic differentiation. J Cell Biochem 93, 721–731.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenbaum, A.J., Grande, D.A. & Dines, J.S. (2008). The use of mesenchymal stem cells in tissue engineering. Organogenesis 4, 23–27.Google Scholar
Sedivy, R., Thurner, S., Budinsky, A.C., Köstler, W.J. & Zielinski, C.C. (2002). Short-term rhythmic proliferation of human breast cancer cell lines: Surface effects and fractal growth patterns. J Pathol 197, 163–169.Google Scholar
Shelton, L. & Rada, J.S. (2007). Effects of cyclic mechanical stretch on extracellular matrix synthesis by human scleral fibroblasts. Exp Eye Res 84, 314–322.Google Scholar
Titushkin, I. & Cho, M. (2007). Modulation of cellular mechanics during osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. Biophys J 93, 3693–3702.Google Scholar
Titushkin, I. & Cho, M. (2011). Altered osteogenic commitment of human mesenchymal stem cells by ERM protein-dependent modulation of cellular biomechanics. J Biomech 44, 2692–2698.Google Scholar
Tuan, R.S., Boland, G. & Tuli, R. (2002). Adult mesenchymal stem cells and cell-based tissue engineering. Arthritis Res Ther 5, 32–45.Google Scholar
Zulpe, N. & Pawar, V. (2012). GLCM textural features for brain tumor classification. IJ CSI 9, 354–359.Google Scholar