Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T06:23:28.848Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What Do You Get If You Cross a Phase Object Approximation with a Dynamically Scattering Sample?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 July 2020

L Clark ,
Colum O'Leary ,
GT Martinez ,
TC Petersen ,
Scott Findlay  and
Peter Nellist
L Clark
Affiliation:
University of Oxford, Oxford, England, United Kingdom
Colum O'Leary
Affiliation:
University of Oxford, Oxford, England, United Kingdom
GT Martinez
Affiliation:
University of Oxford, Oxford, England, United Kingdom
TC Petersen
Affiliation:
Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Scott Findlay
Affiliation:
Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
Peter Nellist
Affiliation:
University of Oxford, Oxford, England, United Kingdom

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Four-dimensional Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy (4D-STEM): New Experiments and Data Analyses for Determining Materials Functionality and Biological Structures
Information
Microscopy and Microanalysis , Volume 26 , Supplement S2 , August 2020 , pp. 460 - 461
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 2020

References

Pennycook, Timothy J., et al. “High dose efficiency atomic resolution imaging via electron ptychography.” Ultramicroscopy 196 (2019): 131–135.10.1016/j.ultramic.2018.10.005CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Leary, Colum M., et al. “Contrast Transfer and Noise Minimization in Electron Ptychography.” Microscopy and Microanalysis 25.S2 (2019): 64–65.10.1017/S1431927619001053CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lozano, Juan G., et al. “Low-dose aberration-free imaging of Li-rich cathode materials at various states of charge using electron ptychography.” Nano letters 18.11 (2018): 6850–6855.10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b02718CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, L., et al. “Probing the limits of the rigid-intensity-shift model in differential-phase-contrast scanning transmission electron microscopy.” Physical Review A 97.4 (2018): 043843.10.1103/PhysRevA.97.043843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkland, Earl J. Advanced computing in electron microscopy. Springer Science & Business Media, 2010.10.1007/978-1-4419-6533-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aveyard, Richard, et al. “Modeling nanoscale inhomogeneities for quantitative HAADF STEM imaging.” Physical review letters 113.7 (2014): 075501.10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.075501CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mawson, T., et al. “Suppressing dynamical diffraction artefacts in differential phase contrast scanning transmission electron microscopy of long-range electromagnetic fields via precession.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2002.01595 (2020).Google ScholarPubMed
Pennycook, Timothy J., et al. “Efficient phase contrast imaging in STEM using a pixelated detector. Part 1: Experimental demonstration at atomic resolution.” Ultramicroscopy 151 (2015): 160–167Google ScholarPubMed
Acknowledgements: The authors acknowledge funding from ESTEEM3 under the Horizon2020 programme. SDF acknowledges support from the Australian Research Council Discovery Projects funding scheme (Project DP160102338).Google Scholar