Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-01T02:09:14.005Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The determination of rock constituents by semi-micro-methods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

Winifred C. A. Guthrie  and
Christina C. Miller
Winifred C. A. Guthrie
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, the University, Edinburgh
Christina C. Miller
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, the University, Edinburgh
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The accurate analysis of an igneous silicate rock is a task beset with difficulties and one which, on account of the very complete analyses now required by petrologists, involves the expenditure of a considerable amount of time. The advantages which accrue from the performance of quantitative analytical operations on the micro-scale are becoming more and more apparent, and the application of at least semi-micro-analytical methods to rocks was thought to have profitable possibilities, particularly in the way of hastening the analyses.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical magazine and journal of the Mineralogical Society , Volume 23 , Issue 142 , September 1933 , pp. 405 - 415
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1933

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 405 note 1 Hueber, H., Min. Petr. Mitt. (Tschermak), 1932, vol. 43, p. 84.Google Scholar [Min. Abstr., 5-238.] H. Thurnwald and A. A. Benedetti-Pichler, Microchem., 1932, vol. 11, p. 200. [Min. Abstr., 5-295.]

page 406 note 1 F. Pregl, Quantitative organic analysis, 1924, p. 7.

page 407 note 1 Blum, W., Journ. Amer. Chem. Sot., 1916, vol. 38(2), p. 1282 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

page 407 note 1 Lundell, G. E. F. and Knowles, H. B. , Journ. Amer. Chem. Soc., 1921, vol. 43(2), p. 1560 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

page 408 note 2 Epperson, A. W., Journ. Amer. Chem. Soc., 1928, vol. 50(1), p. 321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 409 note 1 Kitajima, S., Sci. Papers Inst. Phys. Chem. Res. Tokyo, 1931, no. 330.Google Scholar

page 409 note 2 Raper, H. S., Biochem. Journ., 1914, vol. 8, p. 649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 409 note 3 Barber, H. H. and Kolthoff, I. M., Journ. Amer. Chem. Soc., 1928, vol. 50(1), p. 1625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 409 note 4 Smith, G. F. and collaborators, Journ. Amer. Chem. Soc., 1922, vol. 44, p. 2816 Google Scholar; 1923, vol. 45, p. 286; 1925, vol. 47, pp. 762, 774, 1020

page 410 note 1 Harold, M. A., The Analyst, 1926, vol. 51, p. 450 Google Scholar

page 411 note 1 Penfield, S. L., Amer. Journ. Sci., 1894, ser. 3, vol. 48, p. 30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 413 note 1 Day, T. C. and Stenhouse, A. G., Edinburgh Geol. Soc., 1930, vol. 12, p. 246.Google Scholar