Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T03:53:51.747Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The existence of reversible photosensitivity in some artificial materials containing rutile

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

W. O. Williamson
W. O. Williamson*
Affiliation:
Department of Pottery, North Staffordshire Technical College, Stoke-on-Trent
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In 1934 a contribution from America (Parmelee and Badger, p. 2) reported that a certain glaze, containing rutile, showed rapid reversible darkening in daylight. It was stated that C. H. Zwermann, Jr., ascribed this photosensitivity to titanium. In the present author's experience the phenomenon is often exhibited, in varying degrees, by commercial glazes based on rutile or on the purified titanium dioxide available in industry, as well as by glazes made up in the laboratory from chemical titanium dioxide of high purity. Lee, also in America, observed reversible darkening in sunlight in commercial titanium dioxide itself, and the existence of this effect was confirmed by Williamson (1937) for some brands of commercial titanium dioxide available in Britain. These brands were affected by daylight which had passed through glass, and some tentative suggestions were made regarding the mechanism of the reversible darkening. Later it was demonstrated (Williamson, 1939) that reversible darkening in daylight could be produced in a sample of titanium dioxide of considerable purity, which was itself not discoloured by light, by contamination with iron according to a special method.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical magazine and journal of the Mineralogical Society , Volume 25 , Issue 169 , June 1940 , pp. 513 - 528
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1940

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baly, (E. C. C.). Pepper, (W. P.), and Vernon, (C. E.), 1939. The adsorption of the hydrous metallic oxides by kieselguhr. Trans. Faraday Soc., vol. 35, pp. 1165–1175.Google Scholar
Clarke, (F. W.), 1920. The data of geochemistry, 4th edition, Bull. U.S. Geol. Surv., no. 695. pp. 346–347.Google Scholar
Clews, (F. H.) and Thompson, (H. V.), 1922. The interaction of sodium chloride and silica. Trans. Chem. Soc . London, vol. 121, pt. 2, pp. 1442–1448.Google Scholar
Doelter, (C.). 1911. Die Einwirkung von Kathodenstrahlen auf einige Mineralien und die Natur der Mineralfärbungen. Monatsh. Chem., vol. 32, pp. 299–318.Google Scholar
Doelter, (C.). 1918. Handbuch der Mineralchemie, vol. 3, pt. 1, pp. 23–25, 31-33, 36. Dresden and Leipzig.Google Scholar
Ekstein, (H.), 1938. Sur la couleur des cristaux de sel gemme artificiel. Bull. Soc. Franç. Min., vol. 61, pp. 239–244.Google Scholar
de Gaouck, (V.) and Le Fèvre, (R. J. W.), 1939. The phototropy of anils, and a note on the phototropy of solutions of the leuco-cyanides of malachite- and brilliant-greens. Journ. Chem. Soc. London, pp. 1457–1465.Google Scholar
Friend, (J. N.) and Allchin, (J. P.), 1939. Colour of celestine. Nature, London, vol. 144, p. 633.Google Scholar
Goodeve, (C. F.), 1937. The absorption spectra and photosensitising activity of white pigments. Trans. Faraday Soc., vol. 33, pp. 340–347.Google Scholar
Goodeve, (C. F.) and Kitchener, (J. A.), 1938a. Photosensitisation by titanium dioxide. Trans. Faraday Soc., vol. 34. pp. 570–579.Google Scholar
Goodeve, (C. F.), 1938b. The mechanism of photosensitisation by solids. Trans. Faraday Soc., vol. 34, pp. .902–912.Google Scholar
Hibben, (J. H.), 1937. The reemission of visible light and the coloration by ultraviolet light of certain crystals. Physical Review, ser. 2, vol. 51, p. 530.Google Scholar
Holmquist, (P. J.), 1896. Synthetische Studien über die Perowskit- und Pyro-chlormineralien. Bull. Geol. Inst. Upsala, vol. 3, pp. 181–268.Google Scholar
Junker, (E.), 1936. Zur Kenntnis des Verhaltens des Titandioxydes beim Erhitzen und seines Verhaltens zu Fe2O3, Na2O und MgO. Zeit. Anorg. Chemie, vol. 228, pp. 97–111.Google Scholar
Lee, (O. I.), 1936. A new property of matter: reversible photosensitivity in hack-manite from Bancroft, Ontario. Amer. Min., vol. 21, pp. 764–776.Google Scholar
Mellor, (J. W.), 1927. A comprehensive treatise on inorganic and theoretical chemistry, vol. 7, pp. 32–33. London.Google Scholar
Morgan, (G. T.) and Pratt, (D. D.), 1938. British chemical industry. London.Google Scholar
Mott, (N. F.), 1938. Annual Reports on the Progress of Chemistry for 1937, pp. 157–158. London.Google Scholar
Parmelee, (C. W.) and Badger, (A. E.), 1934. Notes on the coloration of glazes by light. Journ. Amer. Ceram. Soc., vol. 17, pp. 1–2.Google Scholar
Smits, (A.) translated by Thomas, (J. S.), 1922. The theory of allotropy. London.Google Scholar
Smits, (A.) 1938. Die Theorie der Komplexität und der Allotropie. Berlin.Google Scholar
Spencer, (L. J.), 1936. A key to precious stones. London and Glasgow.Google Scholar
Weiser, (H. B.) and Milligan, (W. O.), 1934. X-ray studies on the hydrous oxides. IV. Titanium dioxide. Journ. Physic. Chem., vol. 38, pp. 513–519.Google Scholar
Williamson, (W. O.), 1937. Darkening of some commercial titanium dioxide in daylight. Nature, London, vol. 140, pp. 238–239.Google Scholar
Williamson, (W. O.) 1939. Photo-sensitive titanium dioxide. Nature, London, vol. 143, p. 279.Google Scholar