Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T23:07:12.691Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Crystal chemistry of K-rich nepheline in nephelinite from Hamada, Shimane Prefecture, Japan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2018

Maki Hamada ,
Masahide Akasaka  and
Hiroaki Ohfuji
Maki Hamada*
Affiliation:
School of Nature System, College of Science and Engineering, Kanazawa University, Kakuma, Kanazawa, 920-1192, Japan
Masahide Akasaka
Affiliation:
Department of Geoscience, Interdisciplinary Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Shimane University, Matsue 690-8504, Japan
Hiroaki Ohfuji
Affiliation:
Geodynamics Research Center, Ehime University, Matsuyama 790-8577, Japan
*
*Author for correspondence: Maki Hamada, Email: hamada-m@se.kanazawa-u.ac.jp
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

K-rich nepheline with a structural formula of A2B6T14T24T34T44O32 (Z = 1) within melilite–olivine nephelinite from Hamada, Shimane Prefecture, Japan, was investigated to clarify its crystal structure and to determine cation distributions in the A and B structural positions of structural channels and tetrahedral T1–T4 sites. The chemical formula of a single-crystal sample was (Na5.437K2.248Mg0.034Ca0.031)Σ7.750(Si8.332Al7.445Fe3+0.158Ti0.009Cr0.005)Σ15.949O32, which results in 65.2, 27.8, 2.1, 3.2 and 1.6 mol.% NaAlSiO4, KAlSiO4, NaFe3+SiO4, □Si2O4 and □0.5(Ca,Mg)0.5AlSiO4 end-member components, respectively, where □ is a vacancy. X-ray diffraction data of a single crystal with dimensions of 0.28 mm × 0.15 mm × 0.05 mm measured at 296 K indicate the space group P63. In the structural refinement, the R1 factor was reduced to 3.69% by taking twinning by merohedry into the refinement. The refinement accounted for 77.7% of the absolute structure and 22.3% of the a and b axes reversed absolute structure. The atomic populations determined in the A and B positions were 1.834 K + 0.166 □ and 5.705 Na + 0.198 K + 0.031 Ca + 0.034 Mg, respectively, implying the substitution of K for Na in the B position. The a and c dimensions are a = 10.0270(3) and c = 8.4027(3) Å. The average <A–O> and <B–O> distances are 3.009 and 2.65 Å, respectively. The substitution of K for Na in the B channel results in increased volume and bond-length distortion of the BO8 polyhedra, which then reduces distortion of the AO9 polyhedra. The average T–O distances indicate that the T1 and T4 sites are essentially filled with Al, whereas the T2 and T3 are filled with Si. Despite the deviation of the O1 oxygen from the triad axis and the combination of K+ ions and vacancies in the hexagonal channels, an incommensurate structure was not observed in the X-ray diffraction data or using the electron diffraction technique.

Keywords

K-rich nephelineX-ray structural analysistwinning by merohedry
Type
Article
Information
Mineralogical Magazine , Volume 83 , Issue 2 , April 2019 , pp. 239 - 247
Copyright
Copyright © Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor: Daniel Atencio

References

Angel, R.J., Gatta, G.D., Ballaran, T.B. and Carpenter, M.A. (2008) The mechanism of coupling in the modulated structure of nepheline. The Canadian Mineralogist, 46, 1465–1476.Google Scholar
Antao, S.M. and Hassan, I. (2010) Nepheline: structure of three samples from the Bancroft area, Ontario, obtained using synchrotron high-resolution powder X-ray diffraction. The Canadian Mineralogist, 48, 69–80.Google Scholar
Balassone, G., Kahlenberg, V., Altomare, A., Mormone, A., Rizzi, R., Saviano, M. and Mondillo, N. (2014) Nephelines from the Somma-Vesuvius volcanic complex (Southern Italy): crystal-chemical, structural and genetic investigations. Mineralogy and Petrology, 108, 71–90.Google Scholar
Baur, W.H. (1974) The geometry of polyhedral distortions. Predictive relationships for the phosphate group. Acta Crystallographica, B30, 1195–1215.Google Scholar
Brese, N.E. and O'Keeffe, M. (1991) Bond–valence parameters for solids. Acta Crystallographica, B47, 192–197.Google Scholar
Brown, I.D. and Altermatt, D. (1985) Bond-valence parameters obtained from a systematic analysis of the Inorganic Crystal Structure Database. Acta Crystallographica, A29, 266–282.Google Scholar
Bruker, (1999) SMART and SAINT-Plus. Versions 6.01. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.Google Scholar
Buerger, M.J., Klein, G.E. and Donnay, G. (1954) Determination of the crystal structure of nepheline. American Mineralogist, 39, 805–818.Google Scholar
Dawson, J.B. (1998) Peralkaline nepheline-natrocarbonatite relationships at Oldoinyo Lengai, Tanzania. Journal of Petrology, 39, 2077–2094.Google Scholar
Dollase, W.A. (1970) Least-squares refinement of the structure of a plutonic nepheline. Zeitschrift für Kristallographie, 132, 27–44.Google Scholar
Dollase, W.A. and Thomas, W.M. (1978) The crystal chemistry of silica-rich, alkali-deficient nepheline. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 66, 311–318.Google Scholar
Foreman, N. and Peacor, D.R. (1970) Refinement of the nepheline structure at several temperatures. Zeitschrift für Kristallographie, 132, 45–70.Google Scholar
Fujii, T. (1974) Petrology of Hamada Nephelinites and Associated Ultramafic and Mafic Inclusions. Unpublished DSc thesis, University of Tokyo.Google Scholar
Gregorkiewitz, M. (1984) Crystal structure and Al/Si-ordering of a synthetic nepheline. Bulletin de Minéralogie, 107, 499–507.Google Scholar
Hahn, T. and Buerger, M.J. (1955) The detailed structure of nepheline, KNa3Al4Si4O16. Zeitschrift für Kristallographie, 106, 308–338.Google Scholar
Hamada, M. (2011) Sr-Na-bearing åkermanite and nepheline in nephelinite from Nagahama, Hamada, Shimane Prefecture, Southwest Japan. Journal of Mineralogical and Petrological Sciences, 106, 187–194.Google Scholar
Hassan, I., Antao, S.M. and Hersi, A.A.M. (2003) Single-crystal XRD, TEM, and thermal studies of the satellite reflections in nepheline. The Canadian Mineralogist, 41, 759–783.Google Scholar
Hawthorne, F.C., Ungaretti, L. and Oberti, R. (1995) Site populations in minerals: terminology and presentation of results of crystal-structure refinement. The Canadian Mineralogist, 33, 907–911.Google Scholar
Hippler, B. and Böhm, H. (1989) Structure investigation on sodium-nepheline. Zeitschrift für Kristallograpie, 187, 39–53.Google Scholar
Hovis, G.L., Spearing, D.R., Stebbins, J.F., Roux, J. and Clare, A. (1992) X-ray powder diffraction and 23Na, 27Al, 29Si MAS-NMR investigation of nepheline-kalsilite crystalline solutions. American Mineralogist, 77, 19–29.Google Scholar
Jones, J.B. (1968) Al–O and Si–O tetrahedral distances in aluminosilicate framework structures. Acta Crystallographica, B24, 355–358.Google Scholar
Kahlenberg, V. and Böhm, H. (1998) Crystal structure of hexagonal trinepheline – A new synthetic NaAlSiO4 modification. American Mineralogist, 83, 631–637.Google Scholar
Matsubara, S., Miyawaki, R., Kato, A. and Matsuyama, F. (1998) Zeolites in nephelinites from Hamada, Western Japan. Journal of the Mineralogical Society of Japan, 27, 195–202 [in Japanese with English abstract].Google Scholar
McConnell, J.D.C. (1962) Electron diffraction study of subsidiary maxima of scattered intensity in nepheline. Mineralogical Magazine, 33, 114–124.Google Scholar
Momma, K. and Izumi, F. (2008) VESTA: a three dimensional visualization system for electronic and structural analysis. Journal of Applied Crystallography, 41, 653–658.Google Scholar
Palmer, D.C. (1994) Stuffed derivatives of silica polymorphs. Pp. 83–122 in: Silica: Physical Behavior, Geochemistry, and Materials Applications (Heaney, P.J., Prewitt, C.T. and Gibbs, G.V., editors) Reviews in Mineralogy, 29. Mineralogical Society of America, Washington DC.Google Scholar
Sahama, T.G. (1958) A complex form of natural nepheline from Iivaara, Finland. American Mineralogist, 43, 165–166.Google Scholar
Sahama, T.G. (1962) Order-disorder in natural nepheline solid solutions. Journal of Petrology, 3, 65–81.Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G.M. (1996) SADABS. University of Göttingen, Germany.Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G.M. (2008) A short history of SHELX. Acta Crystallographica, A64, 112–122.Google Scholar
Simmons, W.B. Jr. and Peacor, D.R. (1972) Refinement of the crystal structure of a volcanic nepheline. American Mineralogist, 57, 1711–1719.Google Scholar
Tait, K.T., Sokolova, E. and Hawthorne, F.C. (2003) The crystal chemistry of nepheline. The Canadian Mineralogist, 41, 61–70.Google Scholar
Takeda, H. (1975) Prediction of twin formation. Journal of the Mineralogical Society of Japan, 12, 89–102.Google Scholar
Tatsumi, Y., Arai, R. and Ishizaka, K. (1999) The petrology of a melilite-olivine nephelinite from Hamada, SW Japan. Journal of Petrology, 40, 497–509.Google Scholar
Tilley, C.E. (1954) Nepheline-alkali feldspar paragenesis. American Journal of Science, 252, 65–75.Google Scholar
Vulić, P., Balić-Žunić, T., Belmonte, L.J. and Kahlenberg, V. (2011) Crystal chemistry of nephelines from ijolites and nepheline-rich pegmatites: influence of composition and genesis on the crystal structure investigated by X-ray diffraction. Mineralogy and Petrology, 101, 185–194.Google Scholar
Yoshizawa, A. (1952) Melilite–nepheline basalts, their olivine-nodules and other inclusions from Nagahama, Japan. Memoirs of College of Science, University of Kyoto, Series B20, 69–88.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Hamada et al. supplementary material

Hamada et al. supplementary material 1

Download Hamada et al. supplementary material(File)
File 61.7 KB