Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:46:41.742Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Experimental and model studies on comparison of As(III and V) removal from synthetic acid mine drainage by bone char

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

Jing Liu ,
Xi Huang ,
Juan Liu ,
Weiqing Wang ,
Wei Zhang  and
Faqing Dong
Jing Liu*
Affiliation:
The Key Laboratory of Solid Waste Treatment and Resource Recycle, Ministry of Education, Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang, 621010 China
Xi Huang
Affiliation:
The Key Laboratory of Solid Waste Treatment and Resource Recycle, Ministry of Education, Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang, 621010 China
Juan Liu
Affiliation:
The Key Laboratory of Solid Waste Treatment and Resource Recycle, Ministry of Education, Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang, 621010 China
Weiqing Wang
Affiliation:
The Key Laboratory of Solid Waste Treatment and Resource Recycle, Ministry of Education, Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang, 621010 China
Wei Zhang
Affiliation:
The Key Laboratory of Solid Waste Treatment and Resource Recycle, Ministry of Education, Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang, 621010 China
Faqing Dong
Affiliation:
The Key Laboratory of Solid Waste Treatment and Resource Recycle, Ministry of Education, Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang, 621010 China
*
*E-mail: Liujing-vip@163.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Acid mine drainage (AMD) commonly contains elevated concentrations of As(III) and/or As(V) due to oxidation of arsenic-containing sulfides. Bone char has been used as a low-cost filling material for passive treatment. The breakthrough curves of As(III) and As(V) were studied in column experiments conducted at different flow rates, adsorption cycle times, and with different coexisting cations and anions to compare their transport behaviours. The experimental data were fitted by the Convection- Diffusion Equation (CDE) and Thomas model with the aim of obtaining retardation factors of As(III) and As(V) and their maximum adsorption capacities, respectively. The maximum adsorption capacities of As(III) and As(V) are 0.214 and 0.335 mg/g, respectively. Coexisting Mn2+ and Al3+ ions can shorten the equilibrium time of As(V) adsorption from 25 h to 8 h, but they have little effect on As(III). The retardation factors of As(III) and As(V) calculated by the CDE model decrease with adsorption cycles from 37 to 20 and 51 to 32, respectively. The Mn2+ and Al3+ ions could enhance retention ability with adsorption cycle time, especially Mn2+ for As(V). Secondary adsorption phenomena were observed only in breakthrough curves of As(V) in the presence of Mn2+ and Al3+. The competitive influences of coexisting arsenic species is As(V) > As(III). Regeneration experiments using distilled water and NaOH solution were completed to quantify the degree of desorption of both As(III) and As(V). The results show that As(V) adsorbed on bone char has better desorption performance than As(III), and the average degrees of desorption of As(III) and As(V) for three desorption experiments are 75% and 31%, respectively.

Keywords

numerical modelarsenic removalbone charbreakthrough curve
Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical Magazine , Volume 78 , Issue 1 , February 2014 , pp. 73 - 89
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Admassu, W. and Breese, T. (1999) Feasibility of using natural fishbone apatite as a substitute for hydroxyapatite in remediating aqueous heavy metals. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 69, 187–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Al-Degs, Y.S., El-Barghouthi, M.I., El-Sheikh, A.H. and Walker, G.M. (2008) Effect of solution ph, ionic strength, and temperature on adsorption behavior of reactive dyes on activated carbon. Dyes and Pigments, 77, 16–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bednar, A., Garbarino, J., Ranville, J. and Wildeman, T. (2002) Preserving the distribution of inorganic arsenic species in groundwater and acid mine drainage samples. Environmental Science & Technology, 36, 2213–2218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bigham, J.M. and Kirk, N.D. (2000) Iron and aluminum hydroxysulfates from acid sulfate waters. Pp. 351–403 in: Sulfate Minerals – Crystallography, Geochemistry, and Environmental Significance (C.N. Alpers, J.L. Jambor and D.K. Nordstrom, editors). Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, 40, Mineralogical Society of America and Geochemical Society, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Borah, D., Satokawa, S., Kato, S. and Kojima, T. (2008) Surface-modified carbon black for As(V) removal. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 319, 53–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Casiot, C., Lebrun, S., Morin, G., Bruneel, O., Personné, J. and Elbaz-Poulichet, F. (2005) Sorption and redox processes controlling arsenic fate and transport in a stream impacted by acid mine drainage. Science of the Total Environment, 347, 122–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, Y.Y., Song, K.H. and Yang, J.K. (2008) Removal of As(III) in a column reactor packed with iron-coated sand and manganese-coated sand. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 150, 565–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, C.-C. and Chung, Y.-C. (2006) Arsenic removal using a biopolymer chitosan sorbent. Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part A, 41, 645–658.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, Y.N., Chai, L.Y. and Shu, Y.D. (2008) Study of arsenic (V) adsorption on bone char from aqueous solution. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 160, 168–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, J.C., West, T.R. and Seol, Y. (1997) Application of MINTEQA2 to the evaluation of apatite as a precipitant for acid mine drainage treatment. Environmental and Engineering Geoscience, 3, 217–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clifford, D.A. and Ghurye, G. (2002) Metal-oxide adsorption, ion exchange and coagulation–microfil-tration for arsenic removal from water. Pp. 217–245 in: Environmental Chemistry of Arsenic (W.T. Frankenberger Jr, editor). CRC Press, New York.Google Scholar
Conca, J.L. and Wright, J. (2006) An apatite II permeable reactive barrier to remediate groundwater containing Zn, Pb and Cd. Applied Geochemistry, 21, 1288–1300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, A., Webb, C., Dixon, D., Sorensen, J. and Dawadi, S. (2007) Arsenic removal from drinking water by limestone-based material. Mining Engineering, 59, 71–74.Google Scholar
Donald, L. (1997) Aqueous Environmental Geochemistry. Prentice Hall, New Jersey, USA, 600 pp.Google Scholar
Duarte, R.A. and Ladeira, A.C. (2011) Study of manganese removal from mining effluent. Mine Water-Managing the Challenges (IMWA 2011, Aachen, Germany), 297–300.Google Scholar
Eary, L.E. and Schramke, J.A. (1990) Rates of inorganic oxidation reactions involving dissolved oxygen. Pp. 379–396. in: Chemical Modeling of Aqueous Systems II (ACS Symposium Series) (R.L. Bassett, editor). American Chemical Society, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Furrer, G., Phillips, B.L., Ulrich, K.-U., Pöthig, R. and Casey, W.H. (2002) The origin of aluminum flocs in polluted streams. Science, 297, 2245–2247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giménez, J., Martínez, M., de Pablo, J., Rovira, M. and Duro, L. (2007) Arsenic sorption onto natural hematite, magnetite, and goethite. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 141, 575–580.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gu, Z., Fang, J. and Deng, B. (2005) Preparation and evaluation of gac-based iron-containing adsorbents for arsenic removal. Environmental Science & Technology, 39, 3833–3843.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gupta, V., Saini, V. and Jain, N. (2005) Adsorption of As(III) from aqueous solutions by iron oxide-coated sand. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 288, 55–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hammarstrom, J.M., Sibrell, P.L. and Belkin, H.E. (2003) Characterization of limestone reacted with acid-mine drainage in a pulsed limestone bed treatment system at the Friendship Hill national historical site, Pennsylvania, USA. Applied Geochemistry, 18, 1705–1721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henke, K.R. (2009) Arsenic in natural environments. Pp. 69–235 in: Arsenic Environmental Chemistry, Health Threats and Waste Treatment (K. Henke, editor). John Wiley & Sons Ltd., West Sussex, UK.Google Scholar
Ho, Y.-S. and McKay, G. (1999) Pseudo-second order model for sorption processes. Process Biochemistry, 34, 451–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, M.F., Thomas, D.J. and Kenyon, E.M. (2009) Toxicology and epidemiology of arsenic and its compounds Pp. 237–265 in: Arsenic Environmental Chemistry, Health Threats and Waste Treatment (K. Henke, editor). John Wiley & Sons Ltd., West Sussex, UK.Google Scholar
Johnson, R., Tratnyek, P., Miehr, R., Thoms, R. and Bandstra, J. (2005) Reduction of hydraulic conductivity and reactivity in zero-valent iron columns by oxygen and TNT. Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation, 25, 129–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ko, D.C.K., Porter, J.F. and McKay, G. (2001) Filmpore diffusion model for the fixed-bed sorption of copper and cadmium ions onto bone char. Water Research, 35, 3876–3886.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ladeira, A.C. and Ciminelli, V.n.S. (2004) Adsorption and desorption of arsenic on an oxisol and its constituents. Water Research, 38, 2087–2094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Z., Beachner, R., McManama, Z. and Hanlie, H. (2007) Sorption of arsenic by surfactant-modified zeolite and kaolinite. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 105, 291–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lien, H.-L. and Wilkin, R.T. (2005) High-level arsenite removal from groundwater by zero-valent iron. Chemosphere, 59, 377–386.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lin, T.F. and Wu, J.K. (2001) Adsorption of arsenite and arsenate within activated alumina grains: Equilibrium and kinetics. Water Research, 35, 2049–2057.Google ScholarPubMed
Liu, J., Cheng, H., Zhao, F., Dong, F. and Frost, R.L. (2012) Effect of reactive bed mineralogy on arsenic retention and permeability of synthetic arseniccontaining acid mine drainage. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 394, 530–538.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ludwig, R.D., Smyth, D.J.A., Blowes, D.W., Spink, L.E., Wilkin, R.T., Jewett, D.G. and Weisener, C.J. (2009) Treatment of arsenic, heavy metals, and acidi ty using a mixed zvi-compost prb. Environmental Science & Technology, 43, 1970–1976.Google Scholar
Macedo-Miranda, M. and Olguín, M. (2007) Arsenic sorption by modified clinoptilolite-heulandite rich tuffs. Journal of Inclusion Phenomena and Macrocyclic Chemistry, 59, 131–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maji, S.K., Pal, A., Pal, T. and Adak, A. (2007) Modeling and fixed bed column adsorption of As(III) on laterite soil. Separation and Purification Technology, 56, 284–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maji, S.K., Kao, Y.-H. and Liu, C.-W. (2011) Arsenic removal from real arsenic-bearing groundwater by adsorption on iron-oxide-coated natural rock (IOCNR). Desalination, 280, 72–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maji, S.K., Kao, Y.-H., Wang, C.-J., Lu, G.-S., Wu, J.-J. and Liu, C.-W. (2012) Fixed bed adsorption of As(III) on iron-oxide-coated natural rock (IOCNR) and application to real arsenic-bearing groundwater. Chemical Engineering Journal, 283, 285–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mak, M.S.H., Lo, I.M.C. and Liu, T. (2011) Synergistic effect of coupling zero-valent iron with iron oxidecoated sand in columns for chromate and arsenate removal from groundwater: Influences of humic acid and the reactive media configuration. Water Research, 45, 6575–6584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manning, B.A., Fendorf, S.E., Bostick, B. and Suarez, D.L. (2002) Arsenic(III) oxidation and arsenic (V) adsorption reactions on synthetic birnessite. Environmental Science & Technology, 36, 976–981.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ohki, A., Nakayachigo, K., Naka, K. and Maeda, S. (1996) Adsorption of inorganic and organic arsenic compounds by aluminium-loaded coral limestone. Applied Organometallic Chemistry, 10, 747–752.3.0.CO;2-Q>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliva, J., De Pablo, J., Cortina, J.L., Cama, J. and Ayora, C. (2010) The use of Apatite IITM to remove divalent metal ions zinc(II), lead(II), manganese(II) and iron(II) from water in passive treatment systems: Column experiments. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 184, 364–374.Google Scholar
Oliva, J., De Pablo, J., Cortina, J.L., Cama, J. and Ayora, C. (2011) Removal of cadmium, copper, nickel, cobalt and mercury from water by Apatite IITM: Column experiments. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 194, 312–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliva, J., Cama, J., Cortina, J.L., Ayora, C. and De Pablo, J. (2012) Biogenic hydroxyapatite (Apatite IITM) dissolution kinetics and metal removal from acid mine drainage. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 213–214, 7–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pena, M.E., Korfiatis, G.P., Patel, M., Lippincott, L. and Meng, X. (2005) Adsorption of As(V) and As (III) by nanocrystalline titanium dioxide. Water Research, 39, 2327–2337.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robinson, B.C. (2010) Mine Drainage and Related Problems. Nova Science Publishers, Inc., New York, 275 pp.Google Scholar
Santomartino, S. and Webb, J.A. (2007) Estimating the longevity of limestone drains in treating acid mine drainage containing high concentrations of iron. Applied Geochemistry, 22, 2344–2361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarmiento, A.M., Caraballo, M.A., Sanchez-Rodas, D., Nieto, J.M. and Parviainen, A. (2012) Dissolved and particulate metals and arsenic species mobility along a stream affected by acid mine drainage in the Iberian pyrite belt (SW Spain). Applied Geochemistry, 27, 1944–1952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seyler, P. and Martin, J.M. (1990) Distribution of arsenite and total dissolved arsenic in major french estuaries: Dependence on biogeochemical processes and anthropogenic inputs. Marine Chemistry, 29, 277–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smedley, P. and Kinniburgh, D. (2002) A review of the source, behaviour and distribution of arsenic in natural waters. Applied Geochemistry, 17, 517–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sneddon, I., Garelick, H. and Valsami-Jones, E. (2005) An investigation into arsenic (V) removal from aqueous solutions by hydroxylapatite and bone-char. Mineralogical Magazine, 69, 769–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, H.C. (1944) Heterogeneous ion exchange in a flowing system. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 66, 1664–1666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tournassat, C., Charlet, L., Bosbach, D. and Manceau, A. (2002) Arsenic(III) oxidation by birnessite and precipitation of manganese(II) arsenate. Environmental Science & Technology, 36, 493–500.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, J., Song, K., Kim, B., Hong, S., Cho, D. and Chang, Y. (2007) Arsenic removal by iron and manganese coated sand. Water Science and Technology, 56, 161–169.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yoon, Y.H. and James, H.N. (1984) Application of gas adsorption kinetics I. A theoretical model for respirator cartridge service life. American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal, 45, 509–516.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yoshitake, H., Yokoi, T. and Tatsumi, T. (2003) Adsorption behavior of arsenate at transition metal cations captured by amino-functionalized mesoporous silicas. Chemistry of Materials, 15, 1713–1721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Liu et al. supplementary material

Supplementary Data

Download Liu et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 382.8 KB