Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T01:58:50.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Description and crystal structure of bobkingite, a new mineral from New Cliffe Hill Quarry, Stanton-under-Bardon, Leicestershire, UK

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

F. C. Hawthorne ,
M. A. Cooper ,
J. D. Grice ,
A. C. Roberts  and
N. Hubbard
F. C. Hawthorne*
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3T 2N2
M. A. Cooper
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3T 2N2
J. D. Grice
Affiliation:
Research Division, Canadian Museum of Nature, P.O. Box 3443, Station ‘D’, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1P 6P4
A. C. Roberts
Affiliation:
Geological Survey of Canada, 601 Booth Street, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0E8
N. Hubbard
Affiliation:
30 Thirlmere Road, Barrow-upon-Soar, Leicestershire, LE12 8QQ, UK
*
*E-mail: frank_hawthorne@umanitoba.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Bobkingite, ideally is a new mineral from the New Cliffe Hill Quarry, Stantonunder-Bardon, Leicestershire, England. It occurs as very thin (⩽5 µm) transparent plates up to 0.2 mm across, perched on a compact fibrous crust of malachite and crystalline azurite attached to massive cuprite. Crystals are tabular on {001} with dominant {001} and minor {100} and {110}. Bobkingite is a soft pale blue colour with a pale-blue streak, vitreous lustre and no observable fluorescence under ultraviolet light. It has perfect {001} and fair {100} cleavages, no observable parting, conchoidal fracture, and is brittle. Its Mohs' hardness is 3 and the calculated density is 3.254 g/cm3. Bobkingite is biaxial negative with α = 1.724(2), β = 1.745(2), γ = 1.750(2), 2Vγmeas = 33(6)°, 2Vcalc = 52°, pleochroism distinct, X = very pale blue, Z = pale greenish blue, X^a = 22° (in β obtuse), Y = c, Z = b. Bobkingite is monoclinic, space group C2/m, unit-cell parameters (refined from powder data): a = 10.301(8), b = 6.758(3), c = 8.835(7)Å, β = 111.53(6)°, V = 572.1(7)Å3, Z = 2. The seven strongest lines in the X-ray powder-diffraction pattern are [d (Å), I, (hkl)]: 8.199, 100, (001); 5.502, 100, (110); 5.029, 40, (01); 2.883, 80, (310); 2.693, 40, (13); 2.263, 40, (113), (03); 2.188, 50, (23). Chemical analysis by electron microprobe and crystal-structure solution and refinement gave CuO 70.46, Cl 12.71, H2O 19.19, O≡Cl –2.87, sum 99.49 wt.%, where the amount of H2O was determined by crystal-structure analysis. The resulting empirical formula on the basis of 12 anions (including 8 (OH) and 2H2O) is Cu4.99Cl2.02O10H12. The crystal structure was solved by direct methods and refined to an R index of 2.6% for 638 observed reflections measured with X-rays on a single crystal. Three distinct (Cuϕ6) (ϕ = unspecified anion) octahedra share edges to form a framework that is related to the structures of paratacamite and the Cu2(OH)3Cl polymorphs, atacamite and clinoatacamite. The mineral is named for Robert King, formerly of the Department of Geology, Leicester University, prominent mineral collector and founding member of the Russell Society. The mineral and its name have been approved by the Commission on New Minerals and Mineral Names of the International Mineralogical Association.

Keywords

bobkingitenew mineralchemical analysiscrystal structurepentacopper dichloride octahydroxyl-dihydrateCu2(OH)3Cl polymorphsLeicestershireEngland
Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical Magazine , Volume 66 , Issue 2 , April 2002 , pp. 301 - 311
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brown, I.D. and Altermatt, D. (1985) Bond-valence parameters obtained from a systematic analysis of the inorganic crystal structure database. Acta Crystallographica, B41, 244–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, P.C. and Hawthorne, F.C. (1995) Mixed-ligand Cu2+ϕ6 octahedra in minerals: Observed stereo-chemistry and Hartree- Fock calculations. The Canadian Mineralogist, 33, 1177–1188.Google Scholar
Burns, P.C. and Hawthorne, F.C. (1996) Static and dynamic Jahn-Teller effects in Cu2+ oxysalt minerals. The Canadian Mineralogist, 34, 1089–1105.Google Scholar
Burns, P.C., Cooper, M.A. and Hawthorne, F.C. (1995) Claringbullite: a Cu2+ oxysalt with Cu2+ in trigonalprismatic coordination. The Canadian Mineralogist, 33, 633–639.Google Scholar
Cooper, M.A. and Hawthorne, F.C. (2001) Structure topology and hydrogen bonding in marthozite, Cu2+[(UO2)3(SeO3)2O2](H2O)6, a comparison with guilleminite, Ba[(UO2)3(SeO3)2O2] (H2O)3 . The Canadian Mineralogist, 39, 797–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engberg, A. (1970) An X-ray refinement of the crystal structure of copper(II) chloride dihydrate. Acta Chemica Scandinavia, 24, 3510–3526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleet, M.E. (1975) The crystal structure of paratacamite, Cu2(OH)3Cl. Acta Crystallog raphi ca, B31, 183–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grice, J.D., Szymañski, J.T. and Jambor, J.L. (1996) The crystal structure of clinoatacamite, a new polymorph of Cu2(OH)3Cl. The Canadian Mineralogist, 34, 73–78.Google Scholar
Hawthorne, F.C. (1985) Refinement of the crystal structure of botallackite. Mineralogical Magazine, 49, 87–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawthorne, F.C. and Grice, J.D. (1990) Crystal-structure analysis as a chemical analytical method: application to light elements. The Canadian Mineralogist, 28, 693–702.Google Scholar
Hawthorne, F.C. and Schindler, M.S. (2000) Topological enumeration of decorated [Cu2+ϕ2]N sheets in hydroxy-hydrated copper-oxysalt minerals. The Canadian Mineralogist, 38, 751–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawthorne, F.C. and Sokolova, E.S. (2002) Simonkolleite, Zn5(OH)8Cl2(H2O), a decorated interrupted-sheet structure of the form [Mϕ2]4. The Canadian Mineralogist (in press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, E. and Bonney, T.G. (1978) The Precarboniferous rocks of Charnwood Forest. Quarterly Journal of Geological Society of London, 34, 199–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jahn, H.A. and Teller, E. (1937) Stability of polyatomic molecules in deg enerate electronic states. Proceedings of the Royal Society, Series A, 161, 220–236.Google Scholar
Jambor, J.L., Dutrizac, J.E., Roberts, A.C., Grice, J.D. and Szymañski, J.T. (1996) Clinoatacamite, a new polymorph of Cu2(OH)3Cl, and its relationship to paratac amite and ‘anaraki te’. The Canadian Mineralogist, 34, 61–72.Google Scholar
Parise, J.B. and Hyde, B.G. (1986) The structure of atacamite and its relationship to spinel. Acta Crystallographica, C42, 1277–1280.Google Scholar
Pouchou, J.L. and Pichoir, F. (1984) A new model for quantitative analysis. I. Application to the analysis of homogeneous samples. La Recherche Aerospace, 3, 13–38.Google Scholar
Pouchou, J.L. and Pichoir, F. (1985) “PAP” (ϕρζ) procedure for improved quantitative microanalysis. Pp. 104–106 in: Microbeam Analysis, 1985, San Francisco Press, San Francisco, California.Google Scholar
Schlüter, J., Klaska, K.-H. and Gebhard, G. (2000) Belloite, Cu(OH)Cl, a new mineral from Sierra Gorda, Antofagasta, Chile. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie Monatshefte, 67–73.Google Scholar
Snowball, G.T. (1952) The Leicestershire intrusions. Leicester Museum Art Gallery Bulletin, third series, 1, 2–7.Google Scholar
Sylvester-Bradley, P.C. and Ford, T.D. (1968) The Geology of the East Midlands. Leicester University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, S.A. (1963) Anthonyite and calumetite, two new minerals from the Michigan copper district. American Mineralogist, 48, 614–619.Google Scholar
Worssam, B.C. and Old, R.A. (1988) Geology of the Country around Coalville. British Geological Survey Memoir. HMSO, London.Google Scholar