Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:48:28.240Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Garavellite, FeSbBiS4, a new mineral from the Cu-Fe deposit of Valle del Frigido in the Apuane Alps, northern Tuscany, Italy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

F. Gregorio ,
P. Lattanzi ,
G. Tanelli  and
F. Vurro
F. Gregorio
Affiliation:
Istituto di Mineralogia, Petrografia e Geochimica Università di Firenze, Via La Marmora 4, 50121 Firenze, Italy Centro CNR per la Mineralogia e Geochimica dei sedimenti
P. Lattanzi
Affiliation:
Istituto di Mineralogia, Petrografia e Geochimica Università di Firenze, Via La Marmora 4, 50121 Firenze, Italy Centro CNR per la Mineralogia e Geochimica dei sedimenti
G. Tanelli
Affiliation:
Istituto di Mineralogia, Petrografia e Geochimica Università di Firenze, Via La Marmora 4, 50121 Firenze, Italy Centro CNR per la Mineralogia e Geochimica dei sedimenti
F. Vurro
Affiliation:
Istituto di Mineralogia e Petrografia Università di Bari, Palazzo Ateneo 70100 Bari, Italy
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Garavellite occurs in polished sections, as small aggregates, up to 200 µm across, of anhedral crystals, usually in direct contact with tetrahedrite, Sb-rich bismuthinite, chalcopyrite, and siderite. Chemical formula Fe0,80Cu0.02Sb1.13Bi0.78As0.01S4 on the basis of S = 4, or ideally FeSbBiS4.

The mineral has an orthorhombic unit cell with a = 11.439, b = 14.093, c = 3.754 Å, Z = 4; calculated density 5.64 gm/cm3. Important diffraction lines are 14.00 (m) 010, 7.08 (m) 020, 3.62 (vs) 230, 3.49 (m) 040, 3.34 (m) 320, 3.20 (vs) 121, 3.10 (m) 201, 2.98 (s) 240, 2.89 (s) 221, 2.63 (vs) 311, 2.51 (vs) 250, 2.16 (m) 421, 1.677 (m) 312. In reflected light it is grey with a brown-olive tint similar to that of tetrahedrite. Bireftectance is distinct and anisotropism is also strong, from yellowish-green to bluish grey. Vickers hardness (50 g load) 212–22 kg/mm2. Reflectance in air: 470 nm R1 = 33.5−34.7%, R2 = 40.5– 42.8%; 546 nm 32.8–34.7%, 40.2–42.0%; 589 nm 32.6– 33.7%, 39.3–41.0%; 650 nm 32.4–34.6%, 38.4–41.0%.

The mineral and name have been approved before publication by the Commission on New Minerals and Mineral Names, IMA.

Frigidite, the so-called nickel-bearing variety of tetrahedrite found at this locality, is shown to be an intergrowth of tetrahedrite and Ni-bearing minerals.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical Magazine , Volume 43 , Issue 325 , March 1979 , pp. 99 - 102
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barton, (P. B.,jr.), 1971. Econ. Geol. 66, 121-32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, (L. G.) and Thompson, (R. M.), 1962. X-ray powder data for ore minerals: The Peacock Atlas. Geol. Soc. Am., Memoir 85.Google Scholar
Buerger, (M. J.) and Hahn, (T.), 1955. Am. Mineral. 40, 226-38.Google Scholar
Capuzzi, (Q.) and Carriero, (M.), 1973. Il Frantoio, 11, 3-7.Google Scholar
Carmignani, (L.), Dessau, (G.), and Duchi, (G.), 1972. Mere. Soc. Geol. ltal. 11, 417-31.Google Scholar
Carmignani, (L.), Dessau, (G.) 1975. Boll. Soc. Geol. ltal. 94, 725-58.Google Scholar
Caye, (R.) and Pasdeloup, (J.), 1976. Card Index COM-IMA, n.1. 0780.Google Scholar
Clark, (A. H.), 1966. Mineral. Mag. 35, 1123-5.Google Scholar
Corsini, (F.) and Tanelli, (G.), 1974. Rend. Soc. Ital. Min. Petr. 30, 205-21.Google Scholar
Craig, (J. R.), Barton, (P. B.,jr.), and Sepenuk, (B.), 1971. Geol. Soc. Am. Abstr. Programs. 3, 305.Google Scholar
Craig, (J. R.) 1973. Econ. Geol. 68, 493-506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Achiardi, (A.), 1881. Atti Soc. Tosc. Sci. Nat., Proc. Verb. 2, 171-8.Google Scholar
Dallan Nardi, (L.) and Nardi, (R.), 1975. In Structural model of Italy. Ital. Res. Nat. Council Pub., Roma, 203-56.Google Scholar
Duncumb, (P.) and Jones, (E. M.), 1969. Tube Investments, Techn. report, n. 260.Google Scholar
Giglia, (G.) and Radicati di Brozolo, (F.), 1970. Boll. Soc. Geol. Ital. 89, 485-97.Google Scholar
Manasse, (E.), 1906. Atti Soc. Tosc. Sci. Nat., Mere. 22, 81-93.Google Scholar
Monetti, (L.), 1924. Rassegna mineraria. 61, 11.Google Scholar
Nowacki, (W.), 1969. Schweiz. Min. Petrogr. Mitt. 49, l09-56.Google Scholar
Palache, (C.), Berman, (H.), and Frondel, (C.), 1944. Dana's system of mineralogy. 7th edn, 1, Wiley & Sons, Inc., NY, London.Google Scholar
Ramdohr, (P.), 1969. The ore minerals and their inter-growths. Pergamon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Sugaki, (A.), Shima, (H.), and Kitakaze, (A.), 1972. Synthetic sulfide minerals (1V), Technology Report Yamaguchi Univ., 1, 76-85.Google Scholar
Tanelli, (G.), 1970. Periodico Mineral. 39, 561-83.Google Scholar
Trevisan, (L.), Dallan, (L.), Federici, (P. R.), Giglia, (G.), Nardi, (R.), and Raggi, (G.), 1971. Note illustrative Carta Geol. d'Italia, foglio 96, Serv. Geol. It. Roma.Google Scholar
Uytenbogaardt, (W.) and Burke, (E. A.), 1971. Tables for microscopic identification of ore minerals, Elsevier Publ., Amsterdam.Google Scholar