Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:02:47.026Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE AUSTRO-MARXIST STRUGGLE FOR “INTELLECTUAL WORKERS”: THE LOST DEBATE ON THE QUESTION OF INTELLECTUALS IN INTERWAR VIENNA*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2012

JANEK WASSERMAN
JANEK WASSERMAN*
Affiliation:
Department of History, University of Alabama E-mail: iwasserman@ua.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This essay examines the efforts by Austro-Marxists to identify, define, and incorporate “intellectual workers” (geistige Arbeiter) into their movement. In this struggle, socialists faced a hegemonic conservative establishment that controlled the largest scholarly societies and intellectual publications and held most positions in the universities and educational bureaucracy. Despite notable successes in “Red Vienna,” a closer examination of the discourse on intellectuals reveals that conservative ideas remained entrenched in interwar Austria. Austro-Marxists could not overcome the class biases and status anxieties of the educated middle class (Bildungsbürgertum), a problem that became more pronounced as the 1920s unfolded. The analysis of this lost debate reveals that the historiography of interwar Vienna requires revision to account for the relative weakness of progressive and radical ideologies and the persistence of antidemocratic, anti-Semitic, and authoritarian beliefs within Viennese intellectual culture. The participants in this “Black Viennese” cultural field have largely escaped critical scrutiny despite, and likely because of, their pervasiveness during the First Republic and after World War II. In looking at Austrian and European debates on the role of intellectuals in modern society, this article places conservatives back at the center of interwar Austrian intellectual and cultural history, while contending that they must bear greater responsibility for the authoritarian and fascist turns of Austria during the 1930s.

Type
Articles
Information
Modern Intellectual History , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , August 2012 , pp. 361 - 388
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 “Die Kundgebung des geistigen Wien,” Die Arbeiter-Zeitung 40 (20 April 1927), 1. Italics theirs.

2 “Geist, Spiritus, und Bubikopf,” Die Reichspost 34 (21 April 1927), 1–2.

3 The Christian Socials ran as part of a bourgeois “Unity List” (Einheitsliste) that included peasants and German nationalist parties. The list received 48 percent of the vote; the Christian Socials themselves garnered seventy-three seats in the parliament.

4 Lux, Joseph, “Wird Österreich Leben?” Die Schönere Zukunft 2 (1926–7), 907–9Google Scholar. See also Maresch, Otto, “Politik und Leben,” Das Neue Reich 9 (1926–7), 692–3Google Scholar.

5 Danneberg, Robert, “Wahlergebnis 1927,” Der Kampf 20 (1927), 210–16Google Scholar.

6 Ibid., 215–16. These figures increased again in the 1930 and 1932 elections. These numbers are drawn from the socialists’ occupational statistics that classify private-sector workers, public officials, soldiers, pensionists, and self-employed individuals as working-class. While their data does not show the voting patterns of each subgroup, most of them likely came from the latter groups, as Danneberg acknowledged. Moreover, since the percentage of the working classes that voted socialist increased and the overall number of socialist voters stagnated and then retreated, bourgeois voters who had voted with the Social Democrats were now choosing other parties.

7 Pauley, Bruce, Hitler and the Forgotten Nazis (Chapel Hill, 1981), 5–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 See my dissertation for an elaboration: Janek Wasserman, “Black Vienna, Red Vienna,” unpublished PhD thesis, Washington University, 2010.

9 See Glaser, Ernst, Im Umfeld des Austromarxismus (Vienna, 1981), 31–76Google Scholar; and Bottomore, Tom and Goode, Patrick, Austro-Marxism (Oxford, 1978), 1–8, 44Google Scholar.

10 For more on conservative ideas of the Reich see Breuning, Klaus, Die Vision des Reiches (Munich, 1969)Google Scholar.

11 Gulick, Charles, Austria: From Habsburg to Hitler (Berkeley, CA, 1948), 709–13, 770–71Google Scholar; and Rabinbach, Anson, The Crisis of Austrian Socialism (Chicago, 1983)Google Scholar, especially the introduction. For representative first-hand accounts see Canetti, Elias, “The Fifteenth of July,” in idem, Memoirs (New York, 1999), 484–90Google Scholar; Reich, Wilhelm, People in Trouble (New York, 1976), 40–48Google Scholar; Fischer, Ernst, Erinnerungen und Reflexionen (Hamburg, 1969)Google Scholar.

12 Collini, Stefan, Absent Minds (Oxford, 2006), 1–3Google Scholar. See also the thought-provoking discussion of this work in Journal of the History of Ideas 68/3 (July 2007), 363–405.

13 The issue of the term's gendering is an intriguing one, which I will not be able to address sufficiently. In Austrian discussions, “intellectual” was not necessarily connotative of masculinity, as the favored term in Austro-Marxist circles (geistige Arbeiter(innen)) appeared in both masculine and feminine forms.

14 Gramsci, Antonio, Selections from the Prison Notebooks (New York, 1972), 5–16Google Scholar.

15 See Rabinbach, Crisis of Austrian Socialism; Gruber, Helmut, Red Vienna (Oxford, 1991)Google Scholar; Blau, Eve, The Architecture of Red Vienna (Cambridge, MA, 1999)Google Scholar; Frei, Alfred Georg, Rotes Wien (Berlin, 1984)Google Scholar; Weihsmann, Helmut, Das rote Wien, 2nd edn (Vienna, 2002)Google Scholar.

16 Again, I find Collini's exposition of various categories of “intellectual” effective for analysis in this context. I will employ his sociological and cultural definitions, coupled with Fritz Ringer's excellent assessment of the intellectual “ideal type” from early twentieth-century Germany.

17 Ringer, Fritz, The Decline of the German Mandarins (Cambridge, MA, 1969), 1–13Google Scholar.

18 Lewis, Jill, Fascism and the Working Class in Austria (New York, 1991), vii–viii, 8–13Google Scholar.

19 Bottomore and Goode, Austro-Marxism, 8–10. See also Kaufmann, Fritz, Sozialdemokratie in Österreich (Vienna, 1978)Google Scholar; and Knapp, Vincent, Austrian Social Democracy (Washington, DC, 1980)Google Scholar.

20 Bottomore and Goode, Austro-Marxism, 12–14. See also Albers, Detlev, Otto Bauer und der “dritte” Weg (Frankfurt am Main, 1979)Google Scholar; Loew, R., “The Politics of Austro-Marxism,” New Left Review 118 (1979), 15–51Google Scholar; Leser, Norbert, Zwischen Reformismus und Bolschewismus (Vienna, 1975)Google Scholar.

21 Glaser, Austromarxismus, 24–5. See also Adler, Victor, “Neue Aufgaben,” Der Kampf 1 (1907–8), 6–9Google Scholar.

22 “Der Kampf,” Der Kampf 1 (1907–8), 1.

23 McGrath, William, Dionysian Art and Populist Politics in Austria (New Haven, CT, 1974)Google Scholar, contains a full account of Pernerstorfer's intellectual predilections.

24 Bn, A.., “Der Kampf in den Lüften,” Der Kampf 1 (1908), 93Google Scholar.

25 Strasser, Josef, “Schwäche als Entwicklungsfaktor,” Der Kampf 1 (1907–8), 138Google Scholar.

26 For more on Adler see Stepansky, Paul, In Freud's Shadow (Hillside, NJ, 1983)Google Scholar.

27 Glaser, Austromarxismus, 52–3.

28 Adler, Friedrich, “Die Entdeckung der Weltelemente,” Der Kampf 1 (1907–8), 239Google Scholar.

29 Lenin, Vladimir Ilyich, Materialism and Empirio-criticism (New York, 1927)Google Scholar, particularly 53–66.

30 Glaser, Austromarxismus, 66, 78–80.

31 Schlesinger, Therese, “Frauenarbeit und Politik,” Der Kampf 1 (1907–8), 313Google Scholar.

32 Popp, Adelheid, “Frauenarbeit und Arbeiterinnenschutz,” Der Kampf 1 (1907–8), 313–17Google Scholar.

33 For more on these progressive reformers see Anderson, Harriet, Utopian Feminism (New Haven, 1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

34 Seitz, Karl, “Freie Schule und Sozialdemokratie,” Der Kampf 1 (1907–8), 355–6Google Scholar.

35 Beller, Steven, Vienna and the Jews (Cambridge, 1989)Google Scholar, Part I makes this argument most forcefully. Hacohen, Malachi, Karl Popper (Cambridge, 2000)Google Scholar, also stresses the Jewish foundations of Viennese progressivism.

36 Renner, Karl, “Der Streik der Studenten,” Der Kampf 1 (1907–8), 434.Google Scholar

37 Ibid.

38 Adler, Max, Der Sozialismus und die Intellektuellen (Vienna, 1910)Google Scholar.

39 Fleck, Christian, Rund um “Marienthal” (Vienna, 1990), 14–53Google Scholar.

40 See Boyer, John, Culture and Political Crisis in Vienna (Chicago, 1995)Google Scholar.

41 Wasserman, “Black Vienna, Red Vienna,” chap. 3.

42 The Social Democrats received 41 percent of the vote and 72 mandates, the Christian Social party 36 percent and 69 mandates, and the German National Party 6 percent and 8 mandates.

43 This attitude would change in the later stages of the Republic as Adler endorsed party unity against the left opposition within the party. See Rabinbach, Crisis, chaps. 2, 3, and 5.

44 Adler, Friedrich, Ernst Machs Überwindung des mechanischen Materialismus (Vienna, 1918), 22–7Google Scholar.

45 Some examples: Kralik, Richard, “Gralkultur and Philisterkultur,” Das Neue Reich 2 (1919–20), 538–9Google Scholar; Waitz, Sigmund, “Wahre und Falsche Wissenschaft,” Das Neue Reich 2 (1919–20), 824–5Google Scholar; Bahr, Hermann, “Vernunft und Wissenschaft,” in Schindler, Franz, ed., Die Kultur (Vienna, 1917), 34–67Google Scholar.

46 Eberle, Joseph, “Zeitfragen,” Das Neue Reich 2 (1919–20), 745Google Scholar.

47 Ringer, Decline of the German Mandarins, 83–102.

48 Lukács, Georg, History and Class Consciousness (Cambridge, MA, 1971)Google Scholar.

49 Ibid., 5–13, 36–8, 46–55.

50 Neurath, Otto, “Bürgerlicher Marxismus,” Der Kampf 23 (1930), 231–3Google Scholar. For more on Hungarian exiles in Vienna see Congdon, Lee, Exile and Social Thought (Princeton, NJ, 1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

51 Somai, Giovanni, Gramsci a Vienna (Urbino, 1979)Google Scholar.

52 Adler, Machs Überwindung, 184.

53 Ibid.

54 Engel, Alfred, “Die Rolle der geistigen Arbeiter,” Der Kampf 12 (1919), 568Google Scholar.

55 Kassel, Richard, “Zum Problem der geistigen Arbeiter,” Der Kampf 12 (1919), 814Google Scholar.

56 Ibid., 817.

57 Ibid., 815–16.

58 Adler, Max, “Der Kampf der geistigen Arbeiter,” Der Kampf 13 (1920), 61Google Scholar.

59 In this formulation, “intellectual” begins to approach the Russian term intelligentsia, with its political connotations.

60 Adler, “Der Kampf,” 65–6. See also Max Adler, “Socialism and the Intellectuals,” in Bottomore and Goode, Austro-Marxism, 266–7.

61 Adler, “Der Kampf,” 65–6.

62 Kutalek, Norbert and Fellinger, Hans, Zur Wiener Volksbildung (Vienna, 1969), 173–6, 185–207Google Scholar. The percentage of bureaucrats and officials was around 40 percent throughout the period.

63 Danneberg, “Wahlergebnis,” 215–16.

64 Membership information was published in year-end reports in Das Jahrbuch der Leo-Gesellschaft, from 1924 to 1928, and the Mitteilungen der Leo-Gesellschaft, published between 1929 and 1938.

65 Wasserman, “Black Vienna, Red Vienna,” chap. 3. See also Breuning, Die Vision des Reiches.

66 For more on Catholic conservatism see Weiß, Otto, Rechtskatholizismus in der Ersten Republik (Munich, 2009)Google Scholar; Hanisch, Ernst, Die Ideologie des Politischen Katholizismus (Vienna, 1977)Google Scholar; and Diamant, Alfred, Austrian Catholics and the First Republic (Princeton, NJ, 1960)Google Scholar.

67 Niessner, Ernst, “Die niedergetretene Intelligenz,” Das Neue Reich 4 (1921–2), 368–70Google Scholar.

68 Eberle, Joseph, “Gründsätzliche Erwägungen,” Das Neue Reich 6 (1923–4), 87Google Scholar.

69 Bacher, E., “Die Privatangestellten im neuen Deutschösterreich,” Der Kampf 12 (1919), 35–42Google Scholar; Appel, K., “Beamte und Sozialismus,” Der Kampf 14 (1921), 122–4Google Scholar.

70 Hollitscher, Arnim, “Die Sozialisierung des Aerztestandes,” Der Kampf 1 (1919), 323–7Google Scholar; Kautsky, Karl, “Die Uebernahme der Aerzte durch die Gesellschaft,” Der Kampf 1 (1919), 621–4Google Scholar; Friedjung, Josef, “Die Vergesellschaftung der ärztlichen Tätigkeit,” Der Kampf 1 (1919), 735–40Google Scholar.

71 Engländer, H., “Zur Frage der Sozialisierung der Rechtsanwaltschaft,” Der Kampf 12 (1919), 555–9Google Scholar; Trebitsch, Oskar, “Das Problem der Richterbestellung,” Der Kampf 18 (1925), 425–31Google Scholar.

72 Eberle, Joseph, “Grundsätzliche Erwägungen,” Das Neue Reich 6 (1923–4), 87Google Scholar.

73 Gulick, Austria from Habsburg to Hitler, 689–95, 1380–81.

74 Arbeiter-Zeitung, 11 July 1930.

75 See Hacohen, Malachi, “Kosmopoliten in einer ethnonationalen Zeit? Juden und Österreicher in der Ersten Republik,” in Konrad, Helmut and Maderthaner, Wolfgang, eds., Das Werden der Ersten Republik (Vienna, 2008), 281–316Google Scholar.

76 Goldscheid, Rudolf, “Goldscheids ‘Naturalabgabe,’” Der Kampf 12 (1919), 336–40Google Scholar; and Neurath, Otto, “Wirtschaftsplan, Planwirtschaft, Landesverfassung und Völkerordnung,” Der Kampf 13 (1920), 224–7Google Scholar.

77 On Freud see Danto, Elizabeth, Freud's Free Clinics (New York, 2005), 1–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For more on Alfred Adler see Stepansky, In Freud's Shadow. See Benetka, Gerhard, Psychologie in Wien (Vienna, 1995)Google Scholar; and Ash, M., “Psychology and Politics,” in Ash, Mitchell and Woodward, William, Psychology in 20th-Century Thought and Society (Cambridge, 1987), 143–64Google Scholar, for the Psychological Institute.

78 Fleck, Rund um “Marienthal”, 122–67.

79 Bernfeld, Siegfried, “Sozialismus und Psychoanalyse,” Der Kampf 19 (1926), 385–8Google Scholar; Jenssen, Otto, “Zur Psychologie des Radikalismus,” Der Kampf 16 (1923), 272–8Google Scholar; Bauer, Otto, “Buch des Bundespräsidenten,” Der Kampf 17 (1924), 209–16Google Scholar.

80 See Stadler, Friedrich, Studien zum Wiener Kreis (Frankfurt am Main, 1997Google Scholar).

81 For publication numbers, see Hofer, Barbara, “Joseph Eberle,” unpublished PhD thesis, University of Vienna, 1995, 106–9Google Scholar. Alda, Patricia, Karl Kraus’ Verhältnis zur Publizistik (Bonn, 2003) 14–5Google Scholar, estimates Die Fackel's circulation between 8,500 and 10,000. Der Kampf only published about three thousand monthly editions.

82 Visitator, “Die Kralik-Abende in Wien,” Das Neue Reich 6 (1923–4), 527–8. See also Beniston, Judith, Welttheater (Leeds, 1998), 3, 68–75Google Scholar.

83 As Jill Lewis, Fascism and the Working Class, has noted, the Vienna-centric political strategy of the Austro-Marxists left provincial socialists in a precarious position, allowing conservatives to control much of the country. It also confirms Yehuda Bauer's argument that Fascist movements drew much of their strength from provincial Lumpenintellectuals. See Bauer, Yehuda, Rethinking the Holocaust (New Haven, 2001), 31–5, 104–5Google Scholar.

84 Spann, Othmar, Der Wahre Staat (Vienna, 1921), 232–45Google Scholar.

85 Siegfried, Klaus-Jörg, Universalismus und Faschismus (Vienna, 1974)Google Scholar; and Schneller, Martin, Zwischen Romantik und Faschismus (Stuttgart, 1970)Google Scholar.

86 See Hannak, Jacques, “Der Theoretiker des Neoklerikalismus,” Der Kampf 18 (1925), 148–55Google Scholar; and Johann, H., “Der Vaterländische Dichter als Denker,” Der Kampf 18 (1925), 211–19Google Scholar.

87 Bauer, Helene, “Othmar Spanns Tischlein-deck-dich,” Der Kampf 15 (1922), 178–82Google Scholar; and Adler, Max, “Zur Kritik der Soziologie Othmar Spanns,” Der Kampf 20 (1927), 265–70Google Scholar.

88 Leichter, Otto, “Enzyklopädisten von heute,” Der Kampf 15 (1922), 372–3Google Scholar.

89 Ibid., 376–7.

90 Schlesinger, Therese, “Die Stellung der Intellektuellen in der Sozialdemokratie,” Der Kampf 16 (1923), 264–72Google Scholar.

91 Zach, Josef, “Zur Frage des geistigen Lebens in unserer Partei,” Der Kampf 18 (1925), 470–74Google Scholar. This confirms Helmut Gruber's findings about the bourgeois prejudices of the socialist leadership. See Gruber, Red Vienna, passim.

92 Pauley, Hitler and the Forgotten Nazis, 93–5.

93 This is not to say that Black Viennese ideology was monolithic. Great variety existed between Messner, Voegelin, and Spann, for example, and figures offered different degrees of support for the Ständestaat and the Nazis.

94 See, in particular, Weihsmann, Das rote Wien; and Glaser, Austromarxismus.

95 Stadler, Friedrich, “Spätaufklärung und Sozialdemokratie in Wien, 1918–1938,” in Kadrnoska, Franz, ed., Aufbruch und Untergang (Vienna, 1981), 441–73Google Scholar.

96 Recent studies in Austrian intellectual history have focused on liberal and Jewish intellectuals; see e.g. Hacohen, Popper; and Coen, Deborah, Vienna in the Age of Uncertainty (Chicago, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Herf, Jeffrey, Reactionary Modernism (Cambridge, 1986)Google Scholar; Hanebrink, Paul, In Defense of Christian Hungary (Ithaca, 2006)Google Scholar; and Sternhell, Zeev, Ni droite, ni gauche (Paris, 1983)Google Scholar are examples of this trend in European conservative scholarship.