Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T17:42:11.217Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Political and institutional constraints on structural reforms: interpreting the Italian experience

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2016

Sergio Fabbrini
Sergio Fabbrini*
Affiliation:
School of Government, LUISS Guido Carli, Rome, Italy
*
∗Email: sfabbrini@luiss.it
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

During 2011 Italy reached the verge of a financial default because of its huge public debt. Neither the centre-right nor the centre-left governments that alternated in power in the 2000s were able to introduce the reforms necessary for reducing the debt and promoting growth. The impotence of the government became incompatible with the requirements of the country's continued presence in the eurozone. In November 2011, under the pressure of financial markets and eurozone institutions and leaders, the incumbent centre-right government was obliged to resign, and was substituted by a government composed of technocrats and experts, the Monti government. This lasted until December 2012 and was supported in parliament by a cross-partisan coalition; it was able to introduce some of the structural reforms required, because of the threat of default but also because it did not need to seek the electoral support of powerful constituencies. This article advances an interpretation of the Italian crisis of November 2011, identifying the political and institutional structures and the specific political conditions that fostered a policy stalemate in the country in the 2000s and whose persistence makes the continuation of reforms after the February 2013 elections uncertain.

Keywords

Italian democracycorporativismparty fragmentationinefficient administrationweak governmentstructural reforms
Type
Contexts and Debates
Information
Modern Italy , Volume 18 , Issue 4 , November 2013 , pp. 423 - 436
Copyright
Copyright © Association for the study of Modern Italy 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Altan, C. T. 1999. Gli italiani in Europa. Profilo storico comparato delle identità nazionali. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Amato, G. 2000. Il gusto della libertà. L'Italia e l'Antitrust. Rome–Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Boeri, T., ed. 2005. Oltre il declino, et al. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Cassese, S. 1998. Lo stato introvabile. Modernità e arretratezza delle istituzioni italiane. Rome: Donzelli.Google Scholar
Cassese, S. 2010. Lo stato fascista. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Cassese, S. 2011. L'Italia: una società senza stato? Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Ciocca, P., and Toniolo, G. 2004. Storia economica d'Italia. Rome–Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Dahl, R. A. 1983. Dilemmas of Pluralist Democracy: Autonomy vs. Control. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
D'Alessio, G. 2012. Ricchezza e diseguaglianza in Italia. Roma: Banca d'Italia.Google Scholar
Fabbrini, S. 2008. Politica comparata. Introduzione alle democrazie contemporanee. Rome-Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Fabbrini, S. 2012a. “Come riformare.” In Cambia Italia. Come fare le riforme e tornare a crescere, edited by Paolazzi, L., and Sylos Labini, M. Rome: Confindustria.Google Scholar
Fabbrini, S. 2012b. “The Institutional Odyssey of the Italian Parliamentary Republic” Journal of Modern Italian Studies 17(1):10–24.Google Scholar
Fabbrini, S. 2012c. “The Rise and Fall of Silvio Berlusconi: Personalisation of Politics and its Limits.” Comparative European Politics, 18 AOP, July 9.Google Scholar
Fabbrini, S., and Vassallo, S. 1999. Il governo. Gli esecutivi nelle democrazie contemporanee. Rome–Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Giannini, M. S. 1986. Il pubblico potere. Stato e amministrazioni pubbliche. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Ichino, P. 2011. Inchiesta sul lavoro. Perché non dobbiamo avere paura di una grande riforma. Milan: Mondadori.Google Scholar
Martinelli, A., and Chiesi, A. M. 2002. La società italiana. Rome–Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Nardozzi, G. 2004. Miracolo e declino. Rome–Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Nardozzi, G. 2010. Il futuro dell'Italia. Rome–Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
North, D. C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Paolazzi, L., and Sylos Labini, M., eds. 2012. Cambia Italia. Come fare le riforme e tornare a crescere. Rome: Confindustria.Google Scholar
Pellizzari, M., and Pica, G. 2011. “Professionisti in cerca di ordine.” In Non ci resta che crescere. Riforme: chi vince, chi perde, come farle, 157–163. Milan: Università Bocconi.Google Scholar
Petrini, P. 2004. Il declino dell'Italia. Rome–Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Rizzo, S., and Stella, G. A. 2007. La casta. Così i politici italiani sono diventati intoccabili. Milan: Rizzoli.Google Scholar
Rossi, G. 2003. Il conflitto epidemico. Milan: Adelphi.Google Scholar
Rossi, S. 2009. Controtempo. L'Italia nella crisi mondiale. Rome–Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Sabbatucci, G. 2003. Il trasformismo come sistema. Saggio sulla storia politica dell'Italia unita. Rome–Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Salvati, M. 2000. Occasioni mancate: Economia e politica in Italia dagli anni 60 ad oggi. Rome–Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Salvati, M. 2011. Tre pezzi facili sull'Italia. Democrazia, crisi economica, Berlusconi. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Toniolo, G., and Visco, V., eds. 2004. Il declino economico dell'Italia. Milan: Bruno Mondadori.Google Scholar
Truman, D. B. 1951. The Governmental Process. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Wehner, J. 2010. Legislatures and the Budget Process: The Myth of Fiscal Control. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar