Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T20:01:49.416Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Analytical Observations Regarding Butvar B-98 and Paraloid B-72 Blends as a Suitable Adhesive in Hot Climates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 February 2017

Paige L. Schmidt ,
Aaron Shugar  and
Rebecca Ploeger
Paige L. Schmidt*
Affiliation:
Art Conservation Department SUNY Buffalo State College Rockwell Hall 230 1300 Elmwood Ave, NY14222
Aaron Shugar
Affiliation:
Art Conservation Department SUNY Buffalo State College Rockwell Hall 230 1300 Elmwood Ave, NY14222
Rebecca Ploeger
Affiliation:
Art Conservation Department SUNY Buffalo State College Rockwell Hall 230 1300 Elmwood Ave, NY14222
*
*(Email: paigelschmidt1@gmail.com)
Get access

Abstract

An adhesive that can withstand elevated temperatures is necessary for the conservation of artifacts in hot climates. The use of Butvar B-98 as a modifier to raise the glass transition temperature of Paraloid B-72 was investigated. The characteristics of B-48N and B-72 blends, currently in use in the field of conservation, were used as a comparison for analysis of the B-98 and B-72 blends. Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) was used to determine the glass transition temperatures (Tg) of the blends and shear testing was used to investigate the shear strength of the blends. While the B-98 and B-72 blends attained elevated glass transition temperatures and performed well during shear testing, issues regarding miscibility and phase separation of the blends were investigated using transmission FTIR, DSC, and optical microscopy.

Keywords

adhesivearchaeologyart
Type
Articles
Information
MRS Advances , Volume 2 , Issue 35-36: Materials Issues in Art and Archaeology XI , 2017 , pp. 1927 - 1941
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Butvar.com. 2015. ’Butvar Polyvinyl Butyral (PVB) Resin’. http://butvar.com Web. 21 October 2015.Google Scholar
Buys, S., Oakley, V.. 1993. The Conservation And Restoration Of Ceramics. Oxford [England]: Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
Cameo.mfa.org. 2015. ‘Paraloid B-72’. http://cameo.mfa.org/wiki/Paraloid_B-72 Web. 23 October 2015.Google Scholar
De Witte, E., Goessens-Landrie, M., Goethals, E.J., Simonds, T., 1978. The Structure of ’Old’ and ’New’ Paraloid B-72, ICOM Preprints, 1–9.Google Scholar
Feller, R.L., 1994. Accelerated Aging. Marina del Rey, CA: Getty Conservation Institute.Google Scholar
Jorjani, M., Wheeler, G., Riccardelli, C., Soboyejo, W. O., and Rahbar, N., 2008. An Evaluation of Potential Adhesives for Marble Repair. Objects Specialty Group Postprints, Volume Fifteen, 95–107.Google Scholar
Koob, Stephen P. 1986. ’The Use Of Paraloid B-72 As An Adhesive: Its Application For Archaeological Ceramics And Other Materials’. Studies In Conservation 31 (1): 7–14.Google Scholar
Macro.lsu.edu., 2015. ’Vapor Pressure’. http://macro.lsu.edu/HowTo/solvents/Vapor%20Pressure.htm. Web. October 19 2015.Google Scholar
McGlinchey, C., Ploeger, R., Colombo, A., Simonutti, R., Palmer, M., Chiantore, O., Proctor, R., Lavedrine, B. and de la Rie, E.R., 2011. Lining and consolidating adhesives: some new developments and areas of future research. In Proceedings of Symposium 2011: Adhesives and Consolidants for Conservation: Research and Applications, October 17-21.Google Scholar
Mtweb.mtsu.edu. 2015. ’How To Calculate A Standard Error Of The Mean In Excel’. http://mtweb.mtsu.edu/ajetton/Graphing_Guides/Excel_Guide_Std_Error.htm. Web. 19 November 2015.Google Scholar
Nautarch.tamu.edu., ’Adhesives And Consolidants - Conservation Manual - Conservation Research Laboratory - Center For Maritime Archaeology And Conservation - Texas A&M University’. N.p., 2015. Web. 15 November 2015.Google Scholar
http://orgchem.colorado.edu/Spectroscopy/specttutor/irchart.pdf. 2015. Web. 15 November 2015.Google Scholar
Podany, J., Garland, K. M., Freeman, W. R., and Rogers, J., 2001. Paraloid B-72 as a Structural Adhesive and as a Barrier within Structural Adhesive Bonds: Evaluations of Strength and Reversibility. Journal of the American Institute for Conservation, Volume 40, Number 1, Article 2, 15–33.Google Scholar
http://www.palmerholland.com/Assets/CE/Documents/data-sheets/Paraloid-B-48N-100.pdf. 2015. Web. 15 November 2015.Google Scholar
Riccardelli, C., Wheeler, G., Muir, C., Scherer, G., and Vocaturo, J., 2010. An Examination of Pinning Materials for Marble Sculpture. Objects Specialty Group Postprints, Volume Seventeen, 95–112.Google Scholar
Selwitz, C.. 1988. Cellulose Nitrate In Conservation. Marina del Rey, Calif., USA: Getty Conservation Institute.Google Scholar
Shashoua, Y., Bradley, S. M., and Daniels, V. D.. 1992. ’Degradation Of Cellulose Nitrate Adhesive’. Studies In Conservation 37 (2): 113–119.Google Scholar
Talasonline.com. 2015. ’Talas || Professional Archival, Bookbinding, Conservation And Restoration Supplies’. http://talasonline.com/photos/instructions/paraloid_solvent_guide.pdf. Web. 12 November 2015.Google Scholar
Unger, A., Schniewind, A. P, and Unger, W.. 2001. Conservation Of Wood Artifacts. Berlin: Springer Google Scholar