Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T04:13:03.468Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dissolution of glass in cementitious solutions: An analogue study for vitrified waste disposal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2018

Colleen Mann ,
Tjin Le Hoh ,
Clare L. Thorpe  and
Claire L. Corkhill
Colleen Mann
Affiliation:
NucleUS Immobilisation Science Laboratory, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom, S1 3JD.
Tjin Le Hoh
Affiliation:
NucleUS Immobilisation Science Laboratory, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom, S1 3JD.
Clare L. Thorpe
Affiliation:
NucleUS Immobilisation Science Laboratory, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom, S1 3JD.
Claire L. Corkhill*
Affiliation:
NucleUS Immobilisation Science Laboratory, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom, S1 3JD.
*
*(Email: c.corkhill@sheffield.ac.uk)
Get access

Abstract

The dissolution of a soda-lime silicate glass in two cement leachate compositions, Young Cement Water (YCW) and Ca(OH)2, was investigated, as an analogue for dissolution of vitrified nuclear waste in a cementitious geological disposal facility. Dissolution was performed at repository temperatures (50°C) and under CO2-exclusion. Dissolution rates were observed to be a factor of 20 times higher in YCW than in Ca(OH)2, as result of the high potassium content of YCW solutions. The precipitation of the zeolite phase, K-phillipsite (K(Si,Al)8O16·6H2O), is thought to be responsible for elevated dissolution rates. Conversely, in Ca(OH)2 solutions, the precipitation of calcium- and silica-containing phases, such as tobermorite (Ca5Si6O16(OH)·4H2O), acted to reduce rates of dissolution by forming a barrier to diffusion. These results show that dissolution of vitrified nuclear waste materials in a cementitous repository may be significant during the early stages of cement leaching in groundwater.

Keywords

glasscement & ampconcretenuclear materials
Type
Articles
Information
MRS Advances , Volume 3 , Issue 21: Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XLI , 2018 , pp. 1147 - 1154
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Vasconcelos, R. G. W., Beaudoin, N., Hamilton, A., Hyatt, N. C., Provis, J. L. and Corkhill, C. L.. Applied Geochemistry, 89, 180 – 189 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bel, J. J. P., Wickham, S. M. and Gens, R. M. F.. Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings, 932, 23 – 32 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gin, S. and Mestre, J. P.. Journal of Nuclear Materials, 295, 83–96 (2001).Google Scholar
Mercado-Depierre, S., Angeli, F., Frizon, F. and Gin, S. Journal of Nuclear Materials, 441, 402 – 410 (2013).Google Scholar
Gin, S., Jollivet, P., Fournier, M., Berthon, C., Wang, Z., Mitroshkov, A., Zhu, A. & Ryan, J. V.. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 151, 68 – 85 (2015).Google Scholar
Utton, C. A., Swanton, S. W., Schofield, S. J., Hand, R. J., Clacher, A. and Hyatt, N. C.. Mineralogical Magazine, 76, 2919 – 2930 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Utton, C. A., Hand, R. J., Hyatt, N. C., Swanton, S. W. and Williams, S. J.. Journal of Nuclear Materials, 442, 33 – 45 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Utton, C. A., Hand, R. J., Bingham, P. A., Hyatt, N. C., Swanton, S. W. and Williams, S. J.. Journal of Nuclear Materials, 435, 112–122 (2013).Google Scholar
Corkhill, C. L., Cassingham, N., Heath, P. G. and Hyatt, N. C.. International Journal of Applied Glass Science, 4, 341 – 356 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrand, K., Liu, S. and Lemmens, K.. International Journal of Applied Glass Science, 4, 328 – 340 (2013).Google Scholar
Andriambololona, Z., Godon, N. and Vernaz, E.. Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings, 151–158 (1992).Google Scholar
Mann, C., Thorpe, C. L., Milodowski, A., Field, L. P., Shaw, R. P., Boast, L., Hand, R. J., Hyatt, N. C., Provis, J. L. and Corkhill, C. L.. MRS Advances, 2, 669–674 (2017).Google Scholar
Mann, C.. PhD Thesis, University of Sheffield (2018).Google Scholar
ASTM International, Standard test Methods for Determining Chemical Durability of Nuclear, Hazardous, and Mixed Waste Glasses and Multiphase Glass Ceramics: The Product Consistency Test (PCT). ASTM C1285 (2014).Google Scholar
Titulaer, M. K., den Exter, M. J., Talsma, H., JansenH., J. B. H. H., J. B. H. and Geus, J. W.. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, 170, 113 – 127 (1994).Google Scholar
Ribet, I., and Gin, S.. Journal of Nuclear Materials, 324, 152–164 (2004).Google Scholar
Fournier, M., Gin, S., Frugier, P., and Mercado-Depierre, S.. Materials Degradation, 1, 17 (2017).Google Scholar