Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T03:50:54.543Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Establishing an Optical Measuring Method to Determine the Anisotropy of Embroidered Reinforcement Structures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 January 2019

A. Breier ,
J. Guan  and
A. Spickenheuer
A. Breier*
Affiliation:
Leibniz-Institut für Polymerforschung Dresden e. V., Institute of Polymer Materials, Department of Mechanics and Composite Materials, Hohe Str. 6, 01069 Dresden, Germany
J. Guan
Affiliation:
Leibniz-Institut für Polymerforschung Dresden e. V., Institute of Polymer Materials, Department of Mechanics and Composite Materials, Hohe Str. 6, 01069 Dresden, Germany
A. Spickenheuer
Affiliation:
Leibniz-Institut für Polymerforschung Dresden e. V., Institute of Polymer Materials, Department of Mechanics and Composite Materials, Hohe Str. 6, 01069 Dresden, Germany
*
*(Email: breier@ipfdd.de)
Get access

Abstract

BioEmbroidery for medical applications offers the potential of a directed fiber alignment, density and distribution and allows the production of properties that are customized to the needs. The adaption of the mechanical properties of biomaterials to the requirements of human tissues often results in substrates with space-resolved distribution of stress and thus highly anisotropic behavior. A demonstrative example for such a material would be a stress adapted hernia mesh showing a high stiffness in the area of the abdominal opening and a graduated transition in the marginal area discharging into the material properties of the surrounding tissue. For evaluating the influence of the reinforcement patterns a measuring method had to be established featured by the optical measuring system ARAMIS. This study was drafted to establish a method to analyze embroidered reinforcement structures by optical measurement. A feasible base material had to be identified showing a high and isotropic elasticity assuring no influence on the measuring outcomes. A proper procedure had to be established to gain suitable data and to define significant criterions. An embroidered reinforcement pattern could be applied on an isotropic polyurethane foil (Ellastolan soft 45, BASF Polyurethanes, Germany) and tested in a biaxial texting device successfully in uni- and equibiaxial direction. The images could be edited with ARAMIS software, the deformation visualized and local strains determined. An optimum tuning for the ARAMIS parameters facet size and grid point distance could be identified. By placing section lines parallel to the x- and y- axis during deformation a medium strain could be calculated, allowing the quantification of an anisotropy criterion. A higher anisotropy of the reinforced embroidered samples compared to the plain foils could be proved. The measuring set-up established a method to evaluate the influence of different embroidered reinforcement patterns on the anisotropy of the base material.

Keywords

biomaterialelastic propertiesopticalpolymerstress/strain relationship
Type
Articles
Information
MRS Advances , Volume 4 , Issue 22: Biomaterials and Soft Materials , 2019 , pp. 1267 - 1274
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Breier, A., in A2 - Blair, Todd (Hg.): Biomedical Textiles for Orthopaedic and Surgical Applications, Woodhead Publishing, S. 23–43 (2015).Google Scholar
Rentsch, C., Rentsch, B., Breier, A., et al., J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 92 (1), 185–195 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rentsch, C., Schneiders, W., Hess, R., Rentsch, B., et al., J. Biomater. Appl. 28 (5), 654–666 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breier, A., Hofmann, A., Rentsch, C., Rentsch, B., et al., Drug Deliv. Lett. 2, (3), S. 171–179 (2013).Google Scholar
Hahner, J., Hinuber, C., Breier, A., et al., Text. Res. J. 85 (14), 1431–1444 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spickenheuer, A., Schulz, M., et al., Plastics, Rubber and Composites 37 (5), S. 227–232 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brünler, R., Breier, A., Vater, C., et al. Technische Textilien, 2018 (4), S. 182–184 (2018).Google Scholar
Kalaba, S., Gerhard, E., Winder, J.S., et al., Bioact. Mat. 1 (1), 2–17 (2016).Google Scholar
Junge, K., Klinge, U., Prescher, A., et al., Hernia 5 (3), 113–118 (2001).Google Scholar
Zogbi, L., Trindade, E.N., Trindade, M.R.M., Hernia 17, 2013 (6), S. 765–772 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hahn, J., Bittrich, L., Breier, A., et al., IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 254, (6), 62005 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breier, A., Bittrich, L., Hahn, J., et al., IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 254 (6), 62002 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pimentel, A.M., Alves, J.L., Merendeiro, N.M., Oliveira, D., J. Mat. Proc. Tech. 234, S. 84–94 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uhlig, K., Spickenheuer, A., et al., Plastics, Rubber and Composites 39 (6), S. 247–255 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar