Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T11:40:01.213Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

High-Performance, Flexible, Inkjet Printed Heterostructure Photodetector for Biosensing Applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2019

Ridwan F. Hossain ,
Misook Min  and
Anupama B. Kaul
Ridwan F. Hossain
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, PACCAR Technology Institute Department of Electrical Engineering, University of North Texas; Denton, TX76207
Misook Min
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, PACCAR Technology Institute Department of Electrical Engineering, University of North Texas; Denton, TX76207
Anupama B. Kaul*
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, PACCAR Technology Institute Department of Electrical Engineering, University of North Texas; Denton, TX76207
*
*Email: anupama.kaul@unt.edu
Get access

Abstract

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD), a retinal degenerative disease that results in a continuous degeneration of photoreceptors in the retina, which eventually leads to complete blindness. One approach to combat AMD is through the use of artificially implantable photodetectors that are physically placed on the retina. Interestingly, 2D materials such as photosensitive and semiconducting molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) and electrically conducting graphene have recently received tremendous promise due to their unique photonic and optoelectronic properties and their potential in various types of micro and nano-devices. In this study, a highly biocompatible 2D graphene-MoS2 photodetectors on a flexible polyimide substrate were designed, fabricated using inkjet printing to form photosensitive pixels and tested as a function of photo intensity and strain. The inkjet printed 2D heterostructure devices were photoresponsive and the photocurrent scaled proportionally with the incident light intensity, exhibiting a photoresponsivity R ∼ 0.30 A/W at room temperature. The strain-dependent measurements of photocurrent with bending showed a photocurrent of Iph ∼ 1.16 μA with strain levels for curvature up to ∼ 0.262 cm-1. Inkjet printed graphene and MoS2 inks were also characterized using techniques such as Raman Spectroscopy, Photoluminescence (PL) and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM).

Keywords

2D materialsink-jet printingphotonicheterostructure
Type
Articles
Information
MRS Advances , Volume 4 , Issue 10: Electronic, Photonic and Magnetic Materials , 2019 , pp. 621 - 627
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Age-Related Eye Disease Study Research Group, Archives of Ophthalmology, 119(10), 1417 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abedi, F., Wickremasinghe, S., Islam, A.F., Inglis, K.M., and Guymer, R.H., Retina, 34(8), pp.1531-1538 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hossain, R. F., Deaguero, I. G., Boland, T., & , A. B. Kaul, npj 2D Materials and Applications, 1(1), 28 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fadil, D., Hossain, R. F., Saenz, G. A., & Kaul, A. B., Journal of Materials Chemistry C, 5(22), 5323-5333 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michel, M., Biswas, C., Tiwary, C. S., Saenz, G. A., Hossain, R. F., Ajayan, P., & Kaul, A. B., 2D Materials, 4(2), 025076 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, J. N., Lotya, M., O’Neill, A., Bergin, S. D., King, P. J., Khan, U., & Shvets, I. V., Science, 331(6017), 568-571 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fadil, D., Fayaz, R. F., & Kaul, A. B., MRS Advances, 1(47), 3223-3228 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hossain, R. F., & Kaul, A. B., In 2018 IEEE Photonics Conference (IPC), pp. 1-2 (2018).Google Scholar
Zhan, Y., Liu, Z., Najmaei, S., Ajayan, P. M., & Lou, J., Small, 8(7), 966-971 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Y., Zhou, Z., Zhang, S., & Chen, Z., Journal of the American Chemical Society, 130(49), 16739-16744 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonzalez-Macia, L., Morrin, A., Smyth, M. R., & Killard, A. J., Analyst, 135(5), 845-867 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Setti, L., Fraleoni-Morgera, A., Ballarin, B., Filippini, A., Frascaro, D., & Piana, C., Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 20(10), 2019-2026 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medina-Sánchez, M., Domingo, C. M., Ramon, E., & Merkoçi, A., 16th International Conference on Miniaturized Systems for Chemistry and Life Science (MicroTAS), 1837-1839 (2012).Google Scholar
Pavinatto, F. J., Paschoal, C. W., & Arias, A. C., Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 67, 553-559 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michel, M., Desai, J. A., Biswas, C., & Kaul, A. B., Nanotechnology, 27(48), 485602 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Splendiani, A., Sun, L., Zhang, Y., Li, T., Kim, J., Chim, C. Y., & Wang, F., Nano Letters, 10(4), 1271-1275 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Withers, F., Yang, H., Britnell, L., Rooney, A. P., Lewis, E., Felten, A., & Kim, Y. J., Nano Letters, 14(7), 3987-3992 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, J., Wells, S. A., Sangwan, V. K., Lam, D., Liu, X., Luxa, J., & Hersam, M. C.. Advanced Materials, 30(38), 1802990 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar