Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T12:00:26.789Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Liquid crystal contact lenses with graphene electrodes and switchable focus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 June 2016

Helen F. Gleeson  and
S. Kaur
Helen F. Gleeson*
Affiliation:
School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, United Kingdom
S. Kaur
Affiliation:
School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, United Kingdom
*
*(Email: h.f.gleeson@leeds.ac.uk)
Get access

Abstract

Presbyopia is a ubiquitous age-related disability of the eye, affecting an estimated 1.04 billion people worldwide, reducing their ability to focus on nearby objects. The various solutions to this inevitable vision deterioration are not compromise-free, with a growing need for approaches beyond conventional spectacles. The research motivation for this work is the unique solution offered by liquid crystal (LC) contact lenses to create compromise-free vision across the whole field of view. The distinctive property of LC lenses is that they are switchable, with the application of a voltage activating the lens. The change in focal power is facilitated via a voltage-dependent change in refractive index of the LC. We have successfully demonstrated several versions of electrically switchable LC contact lenses with variable additional optical power of up to +3.00 D, ideal for the correction of presbyopia.

This paper offers a review of the optical and electro-optical performance recently demonstrated for the different modes of operation realized in nematic systems, including planar (homogeneous) and vertically aligned (homeotropic) aligned devices. The change in optical power obtained depends on the choice of geometry and LC material. A material with higher birefringence allows a thinner LC-lens layer to achieve a particular focal power. In the homeotropic geometry, the refractive index of the LC layer is a minimum in the ‘off’ state (ordinary refractive index, no) and the mode is polarization-independent, offering a significant advantage over planar lens designs. The construction is also simplified as only one alignment layer needs to be rubbed. Depending on the geometry used, continuously variable changes in focal power of up to +3.00D have been achieved. The response time of the lenses can be better than half a second, achieved with small applied voltages of ~7Vrms.

A further important stage in the optimization of the contact lenses is the inclusion of graphene as the electrodes. Conventional ITO electrodes are too brittle for these flexible optical systems. The paper also reviews the successful incorporation of graphene into the lenses, with excellent optical and electro-optical results. The device demonstrates the huge potential of graphene in an unconventional liquid crystal device geometry that includes curvature over a relatively large area.

Keywords

liquid crystaloptoelectronicdevices
Type
Articles
Information
MRS Advances , Volume 1 , Issue 52: Soft Materials and Biomaterials , 2016 , pp. 3509 - 3515
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Holden, B. A., Fricke, T. R., Ho, S. M., Wong, R., Schlenther, G., Cronje´, S., Burnett, A., Papas, E., Naidoo, K. S. and Frick, K. D., Arch. Ophthalmol. 126 (12), 1731–1739 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milton, H. E., Morgan, P. B., Clamp, J. H. and Gleeson, H. F., Optics Express 22 (7), 8035–8040 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milton, H. E., Gleeson, H. F., Morgan, P. B., Goodby, J. W., Cowling, S. and Clamp, J. H., Proceedings of SPIE 9004, 900401–900406 (2014).Google Scholar
Syed, I. M., Kaur, S., Milton, H. E., Mistry, D., Bailey, J., Morgan, P. B., Jones, J. C. and Gleeson, H. F., Optics express 23 (8), 9911–9916 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaur, S., Kim, Y. J., Milton, H., Mistry, D., Syed, I. M., Bailey, J., Novoselov, K. S., Jones, J. C., Morgan, P. B., Clamp, J. and Gleeson, H. F., Optics Express 24 (8) DOI:10.1364/OE.24.008782 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bae, S., Kim, H., Lee, Y., Xu, X., Park, J. S., Zheng, Y., Balakrishnan, J., Lei, T., Kim, H. R., Song, Y. I., Kim, Y. J., Kim, K. S., Ozyilmaz, B., Ahn, J. H., Hong, B. H. and Iijima, S., Nature nanotechnology 5 (8), 574–578 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, P., Brimicombe, P. D., Nair, R. R., Booth, T. J., Jiang, D., Schedin, F., Ponomarenko, L. A., Morozov, S. V., Gleeson, H. F., Hill, E. W., Geim, A. K. and Novoselov, K. S., Nano Lett. 8 (6), 1704–1708 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scharf, T., Fontannaz, J., Bouvier, M. and Grupp, J., Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. (Phila. Pa.) 331 (1), 235–243 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gvozdarev, A. Y., Nevskaya, G. and Yudin, I., J. Opt. Tech. 68, 682–686 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patel, J. S. and Rastani, K., Opt. Lett 16 (7), 532–534 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar