Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T16:50:22.722Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Annealing Effects on Ta Doped SnO2 Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 July 2012

Junjun Jia
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Aoyama Gakuin University, 5-10-1 Fuchinobe, Chuo, Sagamihara, Kanagawa 252-5258, Japan
Yu Muto
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Aoyama Gakuin University, 5-10-1 Fuchinobe, Chuo, Sagamihara, Kanagawa 252-5258, Japan
Nobuto Oka
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Aoyama Gakuin University, 5-10-1 Fuchinobe, Chuo, Sagamihara, Kanagawa 252-5258, Japan
Yuzo Shigesato
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Aoyama Gakuin University, 5-10-1 Fuchinobe, Chuo, Sagamihara, Kanagawa 252-5258, Japan
Get access

Abstract

Ta doped SnO2 (TTO) films prepared on quartz glass substrates at 200 °C were annealed in the air to investigate the annealing effect on the structural, the optical, and the electrical properties. It is shown that the annealing for TTO films resulted in beneficial effect on the electrical resistivity by improving the carrier density and Hall mobility. The lowest resistivity was 1.4 × 10-3Ω cm obtained at 400 °C annealing temperature. The scattering mechanism in TTO films was discussed from the optical and electrical perspectives. The variation in Hall mobility with increasing the annealing temperature may be attributed to the scattering from the ionized and neutral impurities in TTO films.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Singh, A. K., Janotti, A., Scheffler, M., and Van de Walle, C. G., Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 055502 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kykyneshi, R., Zeng, J. and Cann, D. P., in Handbook of Transparent Conductors, edited by Ginley, D. S. (Springer, New York, 2010), pp. 171188.Google Scholar
Wang, Y., Brezesinski, T., Antonietti, M., and Smarsly, B., ACS Nano 3, 1373 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsukamoto, N., Tazawa, T., Oka, N., Saito, M. and Shigesato, Y., Thin Solid Films 520, 1182 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muto, Y., Nakatomi, S., Oka, N., Iwabuchi, Y., Kotsubo, H., and Shigesato, Y., Thin Solid Films 520, 3746 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burstein, E., Phys. Rev. 93, 632 (1954); T. S. Moss, Proc. Phys. Soc. London, Ser. B 67, 775(1954).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stjerna, B., Olsson, E., Granqvist, C. G., J. Appl. Phys. 76, 3797 (1994).Google Scholar
Kim, I., Lee, K., Lee, T. S., Jeong, J., Cheong, B., Baik, Y., and Kim, W. M., J. Appl. Phys. 100, 063701 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, R. A., Semiconductors, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Great Britain, 1978) p. 298.Google Scholar
Becker, M. and Fan, H. Y., in Semiconducting Materials, edited by Henisch, H. K. (Butterworth, 1951), p. 132.Google Scholar
Dingle, R. B., Philos. Mag. 46, 831 (1955).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shigesato, Y. and Paine, D., J. Appl. Phys. 73, 3805 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Summitt, R., J. Appl. Phys. 39, 3762 (1968).Google Scholar
Button, K. J., Fonstad, C.G., Debrodt, W., Phys. Rev. B 4, 4539 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar