Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-15T01:18:24.636Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparative Study on Manufacturability of Selective Emitter and Double Printing on Mono-Si PV Cells

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 June 2011

Y. Liu ,
F.D. Jiang ,
S. Wang ,
Y. Zeng  and
W. Shan
Y. Liu
Affiliation:
JA Solar Holdings Co. Ltd., Shanghai, 200436, China
F.D. Jiang
Affiliation:
JA Solar Holdings Co. Ltd., Shanghai, 200436, China
S. Wang
Affiliation:
JA Solar Holdings Co. Ltd., Shanghai, 200436, China
Y. Zeng
Affiliation:
JA Solar Holdings Co. Ltd., Shanghai, 200436, China
W. Shan
Affiliation:
JA Solar Holdings Co. Ltd., Shanghai, 200436, China
Get access

Abstract

Selective emitter structure has long been regarded as a good and relatively simple approach to improve the energy conversion efficiency of Si wafer-based single-junction photovoltaic (PV) cells. Recently emerged double printing method, on the other hand, potentially has the capability of improving the efficiency with no requirement for device structure modification. The manufacturability of these two approaches has been studied on a mass-production platform at JA Solar recently with large scale sampling. The experimental results collected from over two hundred thousand cells demonstrated that both approaches are capable of achieving significant conversion-efficiency gain in a cost-effective way with high yield rate on the PV industry commonly used mass production platform currently adopted by the vast majority of cell manufacturers

Keywords

photovoltaiccrystallineSi
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1323: Symposium C – Advanced Materials Processing for Scalable Solar-Cell Manufacturing , 2011 , mrss11-1323-c04-02
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.See, for example, Brendle, W., Nguyen, V. X., Grohe, A., Schneiderlochner, E., Rau, U., Palfinger, G. and Werner, J.H., Prog. Photovolt: Res. Appl. 14, 653 (2006), and references therein.Google Scholar
2. See, for example, Taguchi, M., Kawamoto, K., Tsuge, S., Baba, T., Sakata, H., Morizane, M., Uchihashi, K., Nakamura, N., Kiyama, S. and Oota, O., Prog. Photovolt: Res. Appl. 8, 503(2000), and references therein.Google Scholar
3. See, for example, McIntosh, K. R., Cudzinovic, M. J, Smith, D. D., Mulligan, W. P., Swanson, R. M., Proc. of 3nd World Conf. on PV Energy Conv. Osaka, Japan, 2003, p. 971, and references therein.Google Scholar
4. Horzel, J., Szlufcik, J., Nijs, J., and Mertens, R., Proc. 26th IEEE PVSC, 139(1997).Google Scholar
5. Haverkamp, H., Dastgheib-Shirazi, A., Raabe, B., Book, F., Hahn, G., Proc. 33rd IEEE PVSC, San Diego, 2008.Google Scholar
6. Low, R., Gupta, A., Bateman, N., Ramappa, D., Sullivan, P., Skinner, W., Mullin, J., Peters, S., Weiss-Wallrath, H., Proc. 35th IEEE PVSC, Honolulu, 2010.Google Scholar
7. Eisele, S.J., Röder, T.C., Köhler, J.R., Werner, J.H., Appl. Phys. Lett. 95, 133501(2009).Google Scholar
8. Kray, D., Bay, N., Cimiotti, G., Kleinschmidt, S., Kösterke, N., Lösel, A., Sailer, M., Träger, A., Kühnlein, H., Nussbaumer, H., Fleischmann, C., Granek, F., Proc. 35th IEEE PVSC, Honolulu, 2010.Google Scholar
9. Antoniadis, H., Jiang, F.D., Shan, W. and Liu, Y., Proc. 35th IEEE PVSC, Honolulu, 2010.Google Scholar