Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T10:35:28.688Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

First-principles Investigation of Edged Ferroelectric PbTiO3 Nanowires and the Role of Axial Strain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Takahiro Shimada
Affiliation:
shimada@cyber.kues.kyoto-u.ac.jp, Kyoto University, Department of Mechanical Engineering and Science, Kyoto, Japan
Shogo Tomoda
Affiliation:
shoppechan@t04.mbox.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp, Kyoto University, Department of Mechanical Engineering and Science, Kyoto, Japan
Takayuki Kitamura
Affiliation:
kitamura@kues.kyoto-u.ac.jp, Kyoto University, Department of Mechanical Engineering and Science, Kyoto, Japan
Get access

Abstract

Atomistic and electronic structures of PbTiO3 nanowires with atomically sharp edges consisting of (100)/(010) surfaces using first-principles calculations. Ferroelectricity is enhanced at the PbO-terminated edge in the nanowire because the Pb-O covalent bond that predominates the ferroelectric distortions is partially strengthened. On the other hand, a significant suppression is observed in the TiO2-terminated nanowire. Surprisingly, the smallest (one-unit-cell cross- section) PbO-terminated nanowire can keep ferroelectricity, while ferroelectricity disappears in the TiO2-terminated nanowires with a diameter of smaller than 17 Å. The ferroelectricity is recovered by axial tension, where the thinner nanowire requires the higher critical strain.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Gu, H., Hu, Y., You, J., Hu, Z., Yuan, Y., and Zhang, T., J. Appl. Phys. 101, 024319, (2007).Google Scholar
2 Yamashita, Y., Mukai, K., Yoshinobu, J., Lippmaa, M., Kinoshita, T., and Kawasaki, M., Surf. Sci. 514, 54, (2002).Google Scholar
3 Blochl, P. E., Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953, (1994).Google Scholar
4 Kresse, G. and Hafner, J., Phys. Rev. B 47, 558, (1993).Google Scholar
5 Kresse, G. and Furthmuller, J., Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169, (1996).Google Scholar
6 Ceperley, D. M. and Alder, B. J., Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 566, (1980).Google Scholar
7 Monkhorst, H. J. and Pack, J. D., Phys. Rev. B 13, 5188, (1976).Google Scholar
8 Umeno, Y., Shimada, T., Kitamura, T., and Elsasser, C., Phys. Rev. B 74, 174111, (2006).Google Scholar
9 Cohen, R. E., Nature 358, 136, (1992).Google Scholar
10 Kuroiwa, Y., Aoyagi, S., Sawada, A., Harada, J., Nishibori, E., Tanaka, M., and Sakata, M., Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 217601, (2001).Google Scholar
11 Shimada, T., Umeno, Y., and Kitamura, T., Phys. Rev. B 77, 094105, (2008).Google Scholar
12 Shimada, T., Tomoda, S., and Kitamura, T., Phys. Rev. B 79, 024102, (2009).Google Scholar