Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T10:43:35.741Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Activation of Low k Dielectrc Surfaces for ALD Barrier Formation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Junjun Liu ,
Junjing Bao ,
Hualiang Shi  and
Paul S. Ho
Junjun Liu
Affiliation:
junjun.liu@us.tel.com, Tokyo Electron, Austin TX 78741, United States
Junjing Bao
Affiliation:
paulho@mail.utexas.edu, The University of Texas at Austin, Microelectronics Research Center, ., Austin, TX, ., United States
Hualiang Shi
Affiliation:
jjbao@physics.utexas.edu, The University of Texas at Austin, Microelectronics Research Center, Austin, TX, 78758, United States
Paul S. Ho
Affiliation:
hlshi@physics.utexas.edu, The University of Texas at Austin, Microelectronics Research Center, Austin, TX, 78758, United States
Get access

Abstract

Atomic layer deposition (ALD) of ultra-thin barrier layers is a key process for implementation of Cu/low k interconnects. Low k dielectric surfaces are generally characterized by weak surface bonds which have to be properly activated for barrier formation. In this study, we investigated the surface activation of low k dielectrics by atomic hydrogen, nitrogen and ammonia beams for ALD of Ta/TaN barrier layers. In-situ x-ray photoemiision spectroscopy (XPS) together with differential FTIR were used to examine the beam modification of the surface and the subsequent growth on the low k surface. The evolution of the low k surface chemistry revealed an initial transient growth region controlled mainly by the substrate surface chemistry. The initial chemisorption was found to be through formation of Ta-O bonds on organosilicates (OSG) and charge transfer complexes on aromatic SiLK. This led to a significant slower initial nucleation on the OSG low k surface without beam activation. The atomic beams, particularly the nitrogen and amine radials, were found to serve as effective reducing agents in initiating and enhancing the precursor chemisorption. This led to an improvement of the barrier film quality and an increase of the deposition rate at a temperature compatible with low k dielectrics (< 400C). In the subsequent linear growth region, atomic hydrogen species was able to reduce the chlorine content under appropriate temperature and with sufficient purge. The effect of porosity in low k dielectrics on barrier formation will be discussed.

Keywords

atomic layer depositionbarrier layersurface chemistry
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 990: Symposium B – Materials, Processes, Integration and Reliability in Advanced Interconnects for Micro- and Nanoelectronics , 2007 , 0990-B09-02
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Leskela, M. and Ritala, M., Thin Solid Films, Vol. 409, p138 (2002).Google Scholar
[2] Zhou, Y. et al., 2003 Char. Metrol. ULSI Technol., AIP Conf. Proc. 683, p455 (2003).Google Scholar
[3] Satta, A. et al., Appl. Phys. Lett., 84 (22), 4571 (2004).Google Scholar
[4] Liu, J. et al., MRS Symp. Proc. 812, p. F2.6 (2004).Google Scholar
[5] Liu, J. et al., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 23 (4), 1107 (2005).Google Scholar
[6] Liu, J. et al., J. Vac. Sci. Technol., B 23(4), 1422 (2005).Google Scholar
[7] Baklanov, M.R. et al., Proc. IEEE 2004 IITC, 187 (2004).Google Scholar
[8] Worsley, M.A. et al., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 23(2), 395 (2005).Google Scholar
[9] Abell, T. et al., AMC 2001, 19, 717 (2002).Google Scholar
[10] Maex, K. et al., J. Appl. Phys., 93, 8793 (2002).Google Scholar
[11] Xu, H. et al., 2003 IEEEI/SEMI Adv. Semi. Manu. Conf., 142 (2003).Google Scholar
[12] Grill, A. and Patel, V., J. Electrochem. Soc., 153, F169 (2006).Google Scholar
[13] Mor, Y.S. et al., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 20(4), 1334 (2002).Google Scholar
[14] Xie, B. and Muscat, A.J., MRS Symp. Proc. 812, p. F1.4 (2004).Google Scholar
[15] Borthakur, S. et al., MRS Symp. Proc. 863, p195 (2005)Google Scholar
[16] Liu, J. et al., J. Vac. Sci. Technol., B May/Jun (2007) (in press)Google Scholar