Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T14:51:38.418Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Adhesion Thin Ductile Films Using Stressed Overlayers and Nanoindentation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2011

M. J. Cordill ,
N. R. Moody  and
D. F. Bahr
M. J. Cordill
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical and Materials Engineering Washington State University, Pullman, WA
N. R. Moody
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical and Materials Engineering Washington State University, Pullman, WA
D. F. Bahr
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical and Materials Engineering Washington State University, Pullman, WA
Get access

Abstract

Differently stressed films of tungsten on silicon dioxide have been studied to determine the interfacial fracture toughness and the Mode I fracture energy release rate of tungsten on glass. Tungsten films with a low compressive stress (less than 1GPa) had nanoindentation tests performed on them to induce buckling. Using mechanics based models and the dimensions of the buckles the fracture energy release rate and the phase angle of loading (Ψ) were calculated to be between 3.8 and 13 J/m2. By varying the residual stress in the film it was possible to examine regions of pure shear (Mode II) interfacial fracture as well as mixed mode interfacial fracture toughness of this system. A similar tungsten film was then used as stressed overlayer on sputtered Pt films on silicon dioxide to determine the fracture energy release rate. Nanoindentation was required to induce buckling, as the overlayer alone did not cause spontaneous buckling. The stressed overlayer method and nanoindentation were used to determine the interfacial toughness of the Pt/silica system to be 1.4 J/m2.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 750: Symposium Y – Surface Engineering 2002–Synthesis, Characterization and Applications , 2002 , Y1.8
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Rickerby, D.S. Surf. Coat. Tech. 36 (1988) 541.Google Scholar
2. Volinsky, A.A., Moody, N.R., Gerberich, W.W., Acta Mater. 50 (2002) 441.Google Scholar
3. Kriese, M.D., Moody, N.R., Gerberich, W.W., J. Mater. Res. 14 (1999) 3019.Google Scholar
4. Marshall, D.B., Evans, A.G., J. Appl. Phys 10 (1984) 2632.Google Scholar
5. Bagchi, A., Lucas, G.E., Suo, Z., and Evans, A.G., J. Mater. Res, 9 (1994)1734.Google Scholar
6. Volinsky, A.A., Moody, N.R., Gerberich, W.W., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 594 (2000) 383.Google Scholar
7. Moody, N.R., Adams, D.P., Cordill, M.J., Yang, N., Bahr, D.F., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 695 (2002) L7.5.Google Scholar
8. Bahr, D.F., Hoehn, J.W., Moody, N.R., and Gerberich, W.W., Acta Mater., 45 (1997) 5163.Google Scholar
9. Kriese, M.D., Moody, N.R., Gerberich, W.W., J. Mater. Res., 14 (1999) 3007.Google Scholar
10. Cordill, M.J., Moody, N.R., Bahr, D.F., to be presented at TMS Annual meeting proceedings Surface Engineering Materials II (2003) San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
11. Cordill, M.J., Moody, N.R., Bahr, D.F., to be published.Google Scholar