Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T07:18:02.805Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Controlling Residual Stress in Metal Matrix Ceramic Fiber Composite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Marwan Al-Haik
Affiliation:
alhaik@unm.edu, University of New Mexico, Mechanical Engineering, MSC01 1150, 1 University Ave., Albuquerque, NM, 87131, United States, 505-277-1346, 505-277-1571
Hamid Garmestani
Affiliation:
hamid.garmestani@mse.gatech.edu, Georgia Institute of Technology, Materials Science and Engineering, 71 Ferst Drive, N.W., Atlanta, GA, 30332, United States
Yousef Haik
Affiliation:
yhaik@uaeu.ac.ae, United Arab Emirates University, Mechanical Engineering, Al Ain, N/A, United Arab Emirates
Get access

Abstract

In metal matrix composites the nature of the reinforcement can influence the development of residual stresses not only as a result of the mismatch in the thermal expansion coefficient between the fiber and the matrix but also caused by the interface of the materials during the processing cycles. The residual stress can be minimized through controlling the processing path and the thermal environment. We studied the residual stress formation and evolution in gamma titanium aluminide (Ti-47AL-2Ta) matrix. The matrix was reinforced with three different types of fibers: Alumina, Sapphikon, and Tiboride through hot isostatic pressing. The composite was heat treated for various combinations of time: 100, 200 and 500 hours; and temperature: 590C, 815C and 982 C respectively. Residual stresses were measured in the gamma phase of the matrix using X-Ray diffraction

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Arnold, S. M., Ayra, V. K. and Melis, M. E., NASA Technical Memorandum No. 103204 (1990).Google Scholar
2. Chandra, N., Ananth, C. R. and Garmestani, H., Journal of Composites Technology & Research 16, 37 (1994).Google Scholar
3. Al-Haik, M.S. and Garmestani, H., Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, 11, 530 (2002).Google Scholar
4. Garmestani, H., Al-Haik, M. and Townsley, T. A., Scripta Materialia, 44, M179 (2001).Google Scholar
5. Hoo, N. and Goodwin, P. S., JOM. 48(7), 40 (1996)Google Scholar
6. Cullity, B.D., Elements of X-Ray Diffraction, Second Edition, Addison-Wesley, Boston, MA, pp. 447478 ( 1978).Google Scholar
7. Noyan, I. C., and Cohen, J. B., Residual Stress Measurement by Diffraction and Interpretation, pp. 117163, Springer-Verlag, New York (1987).Google Scholar