Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-15T07:08:03.975Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Deformation and Fracture Characteristics of a Gamma Titanium Alumtnide at High Temperatures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 1992

V. Seetharaman ,
S. L. Semiatin ,
C. M. Lombard  and
N. D. Frey
V. Seetharaman
Affiliation:
UES, Inc.. 4401 Dayton-Xenia Road, Dayton, OH 45432.
S. L. Semiatin
Affiliation:
Wright Laboratory, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH 45433.
C. M. Lombard
Affiliation:
Wright Laboratory, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH 45433.
N. D. Frey
Affiliation:
Battelle Memorial Institute, 505 King Avenue, Columbus, OH 43201.
Get access

Abstract

The hot workability of a γ titanium alumlnlde alloy was investigated using hot tension tests In the temperature range 900-1350°C and for deformation rates varying from 0.0001 to 5 s−1. One series of tests was performed on cast + HIP'ped material and was designed to characterize fracture behavior during primary ingot break-down. Another series of tests was conducted on extruded and heat treated material In order to Investigate the fracture processes occurring during secondary processing. The deformation and fracture characteristics were analyzed to assess the influence of microstructural features as well as the relative volume fractions of the γ and α/α2 phases.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 288: Symposium L – High-Temperature Ordered Intermetallic Alloys V , 1992 , 513
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Semiatin, S. L., in Workability Testing Techniques, edited by Dieter, G. E. (Amer. Soc. Met., Metals Park. OH, 1984) p. 197. Google Scholar
2. Seetharaman, V., Goetz, R. L., and Semiatin, S. L., in High Temperature Ordered Intermetallic Alloys IV, edited by Stiegler, J. O., Johnson, L. A. and Pope, D. P. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 213, Pittsburgh, PA, 1991). p. 895. Google Scholar
3. Lipsitt, H. A., Shectman, D., and Schafrik, R. E., Metall. Trans. A, 6A, 1991 (1975).Google Scholar
4. Huang, S. C. and Hall, E. L., Metall. Trans. A, 22A, 427 (1991).Google Scholar
5. Krishnamurthy, S. and Kim, Y-W., in Microstructure/Property Relationships in Titanium Aluminides and Alloys, edited by Kim, Y-W. and Boyer, R. R. (The Minerals. Metals and Materials Society, Warrendale, PA, 1991), p. 149. Google Scholar
6. Nobuki, M., Hashimoto, K., and Tsujimoto, T., Bull. Japan Inst. Met., 30, 49 (1991).Google Scholar
7. Yamaguchi, M., Mater. Sci. Tech., 8, 199 (1992).Google Scholar
8. Seetharaman, V. and Lombard, C.M., in Microstructure/Property Relationships in Titanium Aluminides and Alloys, edited by Kim, Y-W. and Boyer, R. R. (The Minerals, Metals and Material Society, Warrendale, PA, 1991), p. 237. Google Scholar
9. Lombard, C. M., Seetharaman, V., and Semiatin, S. L., Materials Laboratory, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio, unpublished research (1992).Google Scholar
10. Semiatin, S. L., Frey, N., El-Soudani, S. M., and Bryant, J. D., Metall. Trans. A, 23A, 1719 (1992).Google Scholar
11. Roberts, W., in Deformation. Processing and Structure, edited by Krauss, G. (Amer. Soc. Met., Metals Park, OH, 1984) p. 109. Google Scholar