Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T05:46:26.614Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dependency of Indium Concentration on Structural Defects in MOVPE-grown InGaN/GaN Heterostructures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

J S Dudding
Affiliation:
jdudding@mix.wvu.edu, West Virginia University, Lane Department of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering, Morgantown, West Virginia, United States
Wenyu C
Affiliation:
wchiang@mix.wvu.edu, West Virginia University, Lane Department of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering, Morgantown, West Virginia, United States
D Korakakis
Affiliation:
Dimitris.Korakakis@mail.wvu.edu, West Virginia University, Lane Department of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering, Morgantown, West Virginia, United States
Get access

Abstract

Indium Gallium Nitride (InxGa1-xN) alloys are currently playing an ever increasing role in optoelectronic devices as the bandgap of such alloys can theoretically be tuned between 0.7eV and 3.4eV–covering the entire visible spectrum. Although growth of high quality InxGa1-xN alloys with high indium mole fractions are difficult or presently unattainable, InGaN alloys are still a viable choice for light emitters and detectors over the visible (blue/green) to ultraviolet spectrum. However, many inherent problems during InGaN growth via Metal Organic Vapor Phase Epitaxy (MOVPE) arise due to the large lattice mismatch and low miscibility between GaN and InN–leading to the formation of Inverted Hexagonal Pyramid (IHP) defects at the termination of threading dislocations. Additionally, growth of InGaN at lower temperatures to promote increased indium incorporation results in poor surface morphology. Several methods such as strained layer superlattices and low mole fraction InGaN layers before the growth of the InGaN/GaN MQW structures have been shown to relive strain in the MQWs, thus reducing the density of IHP defects and/or improving the optical output characteristics. This work focuses on the application of GaN monolayer insertions during InGaN quantum well growth via Metal Organic Vapor Phase Epitaxy (MOVPE) as a means to reduce the IHP defect density and passivate effects on surface roughness while observing variations in indium concentration. Observations include the reduction of IHP defect density by nearly twofold as the number of GaN monolayer interruptions increase from zero to three while sustaining only slightly lower effective indium concentrations.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Matsuoka, T., Superlattice Microst. 37, 1932 (2005)10.1016/j.spmi.2004.06.003Google Scholar
[2] Ponce, F. A., Srinivasan, S., Bell, A., Geng, L., Liu, R., Stevens, M., Cai, J., Omiya, H., Marui, H., and Tanaka, S., Phys. Stat. Sol. (b) 240, 273284 (2003)10.1002/pssb.200303527Google Scholar
[3] Oliver, R. A., Kappers, M. J., Humphreys, C. J., and Briggs, G.A.D, J. Appl. Phys. 97, 13707–1 (2005)10.1063/1.1823581Google Scholar
[4] Wu, X. H., Elsass, C. R., Abare, A., Mack, M., Keller, S., Petroff, P. M., DenBaars, S. P., Speck, J. S., and Rosner, S. J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 72 692–4 (1997)10.1063/1.120844Google Scholar
[5] Shiojiri, M., Chuo, C. C., Hsu, J. T., Yang, J. R., and Saijo, H., J. Appl. Phys. 99 73505–1 (2006)10.1063/1.2180532Google Scholar
[6] Watanabe, K., Yang, J. R., Huang, S. Y., Inoke, K., Hsu, J. T., Tu, R. C., Yamazaki, T., Nakanishi, N., and Shiojiri, M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 82 718–20 (2003)10.1063/1.1542683Google Scholar
[7] Sheu, J.-K., Yang, C.-C., Tu, S.-J., Chang, K.-H., Lee, M.-L., Lai, W.-C., and Peng, L.-C., IEEE Electr. Device L. 30, 225–7 (2009)10.1109/LED.2008.2012275Google Scholar
[8] Leem, Shi Jong, Shin, Young Chul, Kim, Kyoung Chan, Sung, Yun Mo, Moon, Youngboo, Hwang, Sung Min, Kim, Tae Geun, J. Cryst. Growth 311 103–6 (2008)10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2008.10.047Google Scholar
[9] Lai, W. C., Huang, Y. S., Yen, Y. W., Sheu, J. K., Hsueh, T. H., Kuo, C. H., and Chang, S. J., Phys. Stat. Sol. (c) 5 1639–41 (2008)10.1002/pssc.200778559Google Scholar
[10] Park, Y. S., Park, C. M., Lee, S. J., Im, Hyunsik, Kang, T. W., Oh, Jae-Eung, Kim, Chang Soo, and Noh, Sam Kyu, Semicond. Sci. Tech. 20, 775–8 (2005)10.1088/0268-1242/20/8/022Google Scholar