Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T14:21:31.854Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Development of high temperature creep resistance in Fe-Al alloys

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

D. G. Morris
Affiliation:
Department of Physical Metallurgy, CENIM, CSIC, Avenida Gregorio del Amo 8, E-28040 Madrid, Spain.
M. A. Muñoz-Morris
Affiliation:
Department of Physical Metallurgy, CENIM, CSIC, Avenida Gregorio del Amo 8, E-28040 Madrid, Spain.
C. Baudin
Affiliation:
Instituto de Ceramica y Vidrio, CSIC, Campus de Cantoblanco, Camino de Valdelatas, E-28049, Madrid, Spain
Get access

Abstract

Most of the studies aimed at the development of creep-resisting Fe-Al intermetallics have been oriented at application temperatures of the order of 500–650°C, where these materials may compete with conventional stainless steels. The Fe-Al intermetallics are, however, particularly excellent in their oxidation and corrosion resistances at temperatures of the order of 1000°C, where Chromium-Nickel steels are no longer able to withstand the aggressive environments. This presentation is part of a study aimed at the development of good creep resistance at such high temperatures.

Studies of a variety of cast Fe3Al-base alloys, strengthened by solution or precipitate/dispersoid-forming alloying additions, are reported. The alloys show good strength from room temperature to about 500°C, but thereafter strength falls rapidly as thermally-activated deformation processes become operative. Solution additions are capable of producing good low temperature strength, but do not contribute significantly to creep strength at very high temperatures (above 700°C). Precipitation hardening has been examined in Nb-containing alloys, where Fe2Nb Laves precipitates form at intermediate temperatures. These materials show good strength up to about 700°C, but at higher temperatures the fine precipitates coarsen excessively. Strengthening in the intermediate temperature range varies depending on whether the solute is precipitated prior to high temperature testing or concurrent with this.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Whittenberger, J.D., Mater. Sci. Eng. 77, 103 (1986).Google Scholar
2. Rudy, M. and Sauthoff, G., Mater. Sci. Eng. 81, 525 (1986).Google Scholar
3. McKamey, C.G., DeVan, J.H., Tortorelli, P.F., and Sikka, V.K., J. Mater. Res. 6, 1779 (1991).Google Scholar
4. McKamey, C.G., Maziasz, P.J., and Jones, J.W., J. Mater. Res. 7, 2089 (1992).Google Scholar
5. Morris, D.G., Nazmy, M., and Noseda, C., Scripta Metall. Mater. 31, 173 (1994).Google Scholar
6. Jimenez, J.A. and Frommeyer, G., Mater. Sci. Eng. 220A, 93 (1996).Google Scholar
7. Zhang, W.J., Sundar, R.S. and Deevi, S.C., Intermetallics 12, 893 (2004).Google Scholar
8. Kratochvil, P., Pesicka, J., Hakl, J., Vlasak, T. and Hanus, P., J. Alloys and Compounds 378, 258 (2004).Google Scholar
9. Morris, D.G., Muñoz-Morris, M.A. and Chao, J., Intermetallics 12, 821 (2004).Google Scholar
10. Morris, D.G., Muñoz-Morris, M.A. and Baudin, C., Acta Mater. 52, 2827 (2004).Google Scholar
11. Muñoz-Morris, M.A., Garcia Oca, C. and Morris, D.G., Acta Mater. 51, 5187 (2003).Google Scholar
12. Hartig, C., Yoo, MH, Koeppe, M. and Mecking, H., Mater. Sci. Eng. 258A, 59 (1998).Google Scholar
13. Weertman, J., J. Appl. Phys. 28, 362 (1957); Trans. AIME 218, 207 (1960).Google Scholar
14. Dimiduk, D.M., Mendiratta, M.G., Banerjee, D. and Lipsitt, H.A., Acta Metall. 36, 2947 (1988).Google Scholar
15. Morris, D.G., Requejo, L.M. and Muñoz-Morris, M.A., submitted to Intermetallics.Google Scholar