Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T11:05:59.415Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Effect of Reverse Transformation on Recovery • Recrystallization Process in Ti-Pd-Ni High Temperature Shape Memory Alloys

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Ya Xu
Affiliation:
Institute of Materials Science, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305, Japan
Kazuhiro Otsuka
Affiliation:
Institute of Materials Science, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305, Japan
Tatsuhiko Ueki
Affiliation:
Yokohama R & D Lab., The Furukawa Electric Company Ltd., 2–4–3 Okano, Nishi-ku, Yokohama 220, Japan
Kengo Mitose
Affiliation:
Yokohama R & D Lab., The Furukawa Electric Company Ltd., 2–4–3 Okano, Nishi-ku, Yokohama 220, Japan
Get access

Abstract

The effect of martensitic reverse transformation on recovery • recrystallization process in cold rolled Ti-Pd-Ni high temperature shape memory alloys has been investigated systematically by flash heating treatment, micro-Vickers hardness test, differential scanning calorimetry and transmission electron microscopy. It was found that the temperatures of softening in hardness after flash heating treatments agree well with the reverse transformation temperatures in the present alloys, and most of the softening occurs within 60 seconds when annealing temperature is raised to above the reverse transformation temperature. We conclude that the recovery • recrystallization process is controlled by the reverse transformation. The reasons are considered based on the large difference in atomic diffusion rate in the parent phase and in the martensite.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Donkersloot, H.C. and Van Vucht, J.H.N., J. Less-Common Metals, 20, 83 (1970).Google Scholar
2. Khachin, V.N., Matveeva, N.A., Sivokha, V.P. and Chernov, D.V., Dokl. Acad. Nauk SSSR, 257, 167 (1981).Google Scholar
3. Enami, K., Horii, K. and Takakura, J., ISIJ International, 29, 430 (1989).Google Scholar
4. Yang, W.S. and Mikkola, D.E., Ser. Metall. 28, 161 (1993).Google Scholar
5. Lindquist, P.G. & Wayman, C.M., Proc. of the Int. Conf. on Engineering Aspects of Shape Memory Alloys (Butterworth-Heineman, London, 1990), p. 58.Google Scholar
6. Otsuka, K., Oda, K., Ueno, Y., Piao, Min, Ueki, T. and Horikawa, H., Scr. Metall. 29, 1355 (1993).Google Scholar
7. Ueno, Y., Piao, M., Oda, K., Otsuka, K., Ueki, T. and Horikawa, H., Proc. 3rd International SAMPE Symposium (Chiba, Japan, 1993), p. 1274.Google Scholar
8. Enami, K. and Hoshiya, T., Proc. 3rd IUMRS Int. Conf. on Advanced Materials, edited by Liu, C. T., Otsuka, K., Shimizu, K., Suzuki, Y. and Van Humbeeck, J., (Tokyo, Japan, 1993), p.1013.Google Scholar
9. Golberg, D., Xu, Ya, Murakami, Y., Morito, S., Otsuka, K., Ueki, T. and Horikawa, H., Scr. Metall. 30, 1349 (1994).Google Scholar
10. Golberg, D., Xu, Ya, Murakami, Y., Morito, S., Otsuka, K., Ueki, T. and Horikawa, H., Intermetallics 3, 35 (1995).Google Scholar
11. Golberg, D., Xu, Ya, Murakami, Y., Otsuka, T., Ueki, T., Horikawa, H., Materials Lett. 22, 241 Google Scholar