Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T10:12:12.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Effect of Ultraviolet Light Curing on the Material and Fracture Properties of a k∼2.5 Low-k Dielectric

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Ryan S. Smith
Affiliation:
scott_smith@mail.utexas.edu, The University of Texas at Austin, The Laboratory for Interconnect and Packaging, The University of Texas, PRC, Bldg. 160, 10100 Burnet Rd, Austin, TX, 78758, United States, (512)471-8960, (512)471-8969
Ting Tsui
Affiliation:
ting.tsui@gmail.com, IMEC, Kapeldreef 75, 3001 Heverlee, Leuven, N/A, Belgium
Paul S. Ho
Affiliation:
paulho@mail.utexas.edu, The University of Texas at Austin, The Laboratory for Interconnect and Packaging, PRC, Bldg. 160, 10100 Burnet Rd., Austin, TX, 78758, United States
Get access

Abstract

In this paper, we investigated the role of ultra-violet light (UV) curing on the molecular structure and fracture properties of a porous organosilicate glass (OSG) dielectric with k∼2.5. A correlation between material properties, including fracture toughness, and molecular structure was found. Multiple analytical techniques including Fourier Transform IR (FTIR) Spectroscopy, x-ray photo-emission spectroscopy (XPS) and x-ray reflectivity were used to investigate changes in the molecular bonding and material properties with UV curing. Overall, UV seems to be highly penetrating leading to uniform composition and density changes in the low k film to improve its properties. The decrease of methyl and hydrogen content relative to the Si-O-Si bonding structures led to increasing density and dielectric constant with UV exposure. UV curing increases the critical fracture toughness, while the sub-critical fracture toughness is insensitive to UV cure. The correlation between critical fracture toughness and material properties is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Grill, A., Patel, V. Journal of the Electrochemical Society. 153 (8): F169–F175.Google Scholar
2 Jacques, J., Tsui, T., McKerrow, A., Kraft, R. MRS Symposium Proceedings, v. 914: 2732.Google Scholar
3 Jacques, J., Tsui, T., McKerrow, A., Kraft, R. MRS Symposium Proceedings. v. 863: 6166.Google Scholar
4 Iacopi, F et al., J. Appl. Phy. 99 (2006): 053511–1 -053511-7.Google Scholar
5 Goto, K. et al., Adv. Metallization Conference. 2005.Google Scholar
6 Ito, F. et al., Adv. Metallization Conference. 2005.Google Scholar
7 Gage, D.M., Guyer, E.P., Stebbins, J.F., Cui, Z., Al-Bayati, A., Demos, A., MacWilliams, K.P., Dauskardt, R.H. IITC Conf. 2006. pp:149151.Google Scholar
8 Grill, A., A, Neumayer D.. J. Appl. Phys. 2003. 94: 66976707.Google Scholar
9 L, Rountree C.. et al., Ann.Rev. of Material Research. 2002. 32: 377400.Google Scholar
10 Van Brutzel, L, et al., MRS Sym. Proceedings. 2001. 703: V.3.9.1–V.3.9.6.Google Scholar
11 Bonamy, D. et al., Intern. J. of Fracture. 2006. 140: 314.Google Scholar