Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T15:06:03.305Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of Large Load and Shear Rate Variations on the Friction of a Branched Hydrocarbon Liquid

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2011

Delphine Gourdon
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, U.S.A.
Jacob Israelachvili
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

Shear measurements were performed on mica surfaces with molecularly thin films of squalane confined between them. Squalane is a branched hydrocarbon liquid that can be in the liquid, glassy or liquid-crystalline state under confinement. The friction forces, especially the transitions between smooth and intermittent (e.g., stick-slip) sliding, were measured over a wide range of applied loads and sliding velocities. The results reveal that, depending on the conditions, qualitatively different behavior can arise in the same system. These include both abrupt and continuous transitions, short and very long transient effects, and chaotic or saw-tooth stick-slip. The differences between these branched and simpler molecules are compared, and the results are analyzed in terms of rate-and-state models traditionally used in the analysis of seismic phenomena.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Rabinowicz, E., Friction and Wear of Materials (John Wiley & Sons, New York) 1965.Google Scholar
2. Persson, B. N., Sliding Friction: Physical Principles and Applications (Springler, Heidelberg) 1998.Google Scholar
3. Yoshizawa, H., Israelachvili, J.. J. Phys. Chem. 97(43) (1993) 11300.Google Scholar
4. Thompson, P.A., Robbins, M. O., Science 250 (1990) 792.Google Scholar
Thompson, P.A., Grest, G., and Robbins, M. O., Phys. Rev. Lett. 68 (1992) 3448.Google Scholar
5. Drummond, C. and Israelachvili, J., Macromolecules, 33 (2000) 4910.Google Scholar
6. Homola, M., Israelachvili, J. N., Gee, M. L., McGuiggan, P. M.. J. Tribology 111 (1989) 675.Google Scholar
7. Luengo, Gustavo, Schmitt, Franz-Josef, Hill, Robert, Israelachvili, Jacob, Macromolecules, 30 (1997) 2482.Google Scholar
8. Israelachvili, J. N.. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 44 (1973) 259272.Google Scholar
Heuberger, M., Luengo, G., Israelachvili, J., Langmuir 13 (1997) 3839.Google Scholar
9. Drummond, C. and Israelachvili, J., Phys. Rev. E. 63 (2001) 041506.Google Scholar
10. Gao, J., Luedtke, W.D., U. Landman J. Chem. Phys. 106 (1997) 4039.Google Scholar
11. Rozman, M.G., Urbakh, M., Klafter, J., and Elmer, F.J., J. Phys. Chem. B, 102(41) (1998) 7924.Google Scholar
12. Carlson, J.M. and Batista, A., Phys. Rev. E. 53(4) (1996) 4153.Google Scholar
13. Lemaitre, A., Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 (2002) 195503.Google Scholar