Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T07:02:16.479Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Estimation of the long term helium production in high burn-up spent fuel due to alpha decay and consequences for the canister

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2014

Alba Valls ,
Mireia Grivé ,
Olga Riba ,
Maita Morales  and
Kastriot Spahiu
Alba Valls
Affiliation:
Amphos 21 Consulting S.L, Passeig de Garcia i Faria, 49-51, 1-1, 08019 Barcelona , Spain
Mireia Grivé
Affiliation:
Amphos 21 Consulting S.L, Passeig de Garcia i Faria, 49-51, 1-1, 08019 Barcelona , Spain
Olga Riba
Affiliation:
Amphos 21 Consulting S.L, Passeig de Garcia i Faria, 49-51, 1-1, 08019 Barcelona , Spain
Maita Morales
Affiliation:
Amphos 21 Consulting S.L, Passeig de Garcia i Faria, 49-51, 1-1, 08019 Barcelona , Spain
Kastriot Spahiu
Affiliation:
SKB, Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co., Box 250, SE-101 24, Sweden
Get access

Abstract

In the KBS-3 repository concept and safety analysis, the copper container with a cast iron insert plays a central role in assuring isolation of the waste from the surrounding during long periods of time. All processes that affect its stability are thoroughly analysed, including potential detrimental processes inside the canister. For this reason, an estimation of the helium produced during the long term decay of alpha emitters in the spent fuel is necessary to evaluate if the pressures generated inside can have consequences for the canister.

The spent nuclear fuel to be disposed of in Sweden is mainly LWR fuel. The maximum burn-up expected is 60 MWd/kg U for BWR and PWR. A small quantity of BWR MOX is expected to be stored with a maximum burn-up of 50 MWd/kg U.

This work has focused on carrying out calculations of the amounts of He generated during more than 1 million years in Swedish spent nuclear fuels with a benchmarking exercise by using both codes AMBER and Origen-ARP. The performance and agreement of the codes in the He generation from α-decay have been checked and validated against data reported in literature [1].

In the calculation of the maximal pressure inside the canister, the quantity of helium used to pre-pressurise the fuel rods has been accounted for. The pressure inside the canister due to He generation is at all times much lower than the hydrostatic pressure and/or the bentonite swelling pressure outside the canister.

Keywords

Henuclear materialssimulation
Type
Articles
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1665: Symposium NW – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXXVII , 2014 , pp. 297 - 302
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Roudil, D., Deschanels, X., Trocellier, P. Jégou, C., Peuget, S., Bart, J-M. (2004) Helium thermal diffusion in a uranium dioxide matrix. J. Nucl. Mater., 325, 148–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, L., Ferry, C., Poinssot, C., Lovera, P. (2005) Spent fuel radionuclide source-term model for assessing spent fuel performance in geological disposal. Part I: Assessment of the instant release fraction. J. Nucl. Mater., 346, 56–65.10.1016/j.jnucmat.2005.04.071CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferry, C., Piron, J.P., Poinssot, C. (2006) Evolution of the spent nuclear fuel during the confinement phase in repository conditions: Major outcomes of the French research. MRS Symp.Proceedings, 932,pp. 513–520 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferry, C., Piron, J.P., Poulesquen, A., Poinssot, C. (2008) Radionuclides release from the spent fuel under disposal conditions: re-evaluation of the instant release fraction. MRS Symp.Proc., 1107.pp. 447–454 10.1557/PROC-1107-447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferry, C., Piron, J.P., Ambard, A. (2010) Effect of helium on the microstructure of spent duel in a repository: An operational approach. J Nucl Mater, 407, 100–109.10.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.09.034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ronchi, C., Hiernaut, J. (2004) Helium diffusion in uranium and plutonium oxides. J. Nucl. Mater, 325, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roudil, D., Jegou, C., Deschanels, X., P., Peuget, S., Raepseat, C., Gallien, J-P., Broudic, V. (2006) Effects of alpha self-irradiation on actinide-doped spent fuel surrogate matrix. MRS Symp.Proceedings, 932, 529–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guilbert, S., Sauvage, T., Erramli, H., Barthe, M.-F., Desgardin, P., Blondiaux, G., Corbel, C., Piron, J.P. (2003) Helium behaviour in UO2 polycrystalline disks. J. Nucl. Mater, 321, 121–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quintessa Limited (2012) AMBER 5.6 Reference Guide. QE-AMBER-1, Version 5.6.Google Scholar
Oak Ridge National Laboratory (2001) Scale: A Comprehensive Modeling and Simulation Suite for Nuclear Safety Analysis and Design, ORNL/TM-2005/39, Version 6.1.Google Scholar
SKB (2010) Spent nuclear fuel for disposal in the KBS-3 repository. SKB-TR-10–13.Google Scholar