Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T02:34:44.248Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Field Emission From Tetrahedrally Bonded Amorphous Carbon as a Function of Surface Treatment and Contact Material

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

W. I. Milne
Affiliation:
Engineering Department, Cambridge University, England CB2 1PZ
J. Robertson
Affiliation:
Engineering Department, Cambridge University, England CB2 1PZ
B. S. Satyanarayana
Affiliation:
Engineering Department, Cambridge University, England CB2 1PZ
A. Hart
Affiliation:
Engineering Department, Cambridge University, England CB2 1PZ
B. Kleinsorge
Affiliation:
Engineering Department, Cambridge University, England CB2 1PZ
Get access

Abstract

In order to test whether field emission from tetrahedrally bonded amorphous (ta-C) is affected by the back contact material we have carried out a series of emission experiments on Filtered Cathodic Vacuum Arc (FCVA) produced ta-C films. The measurements were made on identical films of approximately 25 nm thickness which have been grown simultaneously on various substrates of different work function. For these experiments the substrates used were p-type c-Si, n-type c-Si, SnO2, tungsten, gold, lead, aluminium, molybdenum, chromium and titanium. Threshold fields for emission were generally in the range of 5–15 V/micron and showed no direct dependence on back contact material work function. Films grown on Ti and W however had much higher threshold fields in the range 30–35 V/micron and this is thought to be associated with the native oxide which was present between the back contact and the ta-C film. As grown ta-C is also known to have a 1–2 nm thick sp2 rich layer on its surface and this layer may also have some effect on field emission. The layer was etched in either an O2 or H2 plasma and both etched surfaces led to improved emission efficiency.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Spindt, C.A., Brodie, I., Humphrey, L. and Westerberg, E.R., J. Appl. Phys., 47, 5248, (1976).Google Scholar
2. Xu, W.S., Tzeng, Y. and Latham, R., J. Phys. D, 26, 1776, (1993).Google Scholar
3. Amaratunga, G.A.J. and Silva, S.R.P., Appl. Phys. Letts., 68, 2529, (1996).Google Scholar
4. Satyanarayana, B.S., Hart, A., Milne, W.I. and Robertson, J., Appl. Phys. Letts., 71 1430, (1997).Google Scholar
5. Geis, M.W., Twichell, J.C. and Lyszczarz, T.M., J. Vac. Sci. Tech. B 14, 2060, (1996).Google Scholar
6. Robertson, J., MRS Proc., 471, 217, (1997).Google Scholar
7. Davis, C.A., Knowles, K.M. and Amaratunga, G.A.J., Surface and Coatings Technology, 76, 316, (1995).Google Scholar
8. Fallon, P.J., Veerasamy, V.S., Davis, C. A., Amaratunga, G.A.J., Milne, W.I., Robertson, J. and Koskinen, J., Phys. Rev B 48, 4777 (1993).Google Scholar
9. Rutter, M.J. and Robertson, J., Phys Rev., to be published (1998).Google Scholar