Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-30T22:23:31.901Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Graphene Composite Materials for Supercapacitor Electrodes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2012

John Lake
Affiliation:
NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, U.S.A. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Columbia University, NY, 10027, U.S.A.
Zuki Tanaka
Affiliation:
NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, U.S.A. Department of Electrical Engineering, University of California, CA 95064, U.S.A.
Bin Chen
Affiliation:
NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, U.S.A. Department of Electrical Engineering, University of California, CA 95064, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

This study presents a materials development of composite electrode materials of graphene oxide (GO) and transition metal oxide nanostructures. Reduced graphene oxide (rGO) films were obtained by electrophoretic deposition (EPD) onto a conductive substrate. Co3O4 and MnO2 nanostructures were synthesized to form composites with rGO. Graphene materials, with high electrical conductivity, high specific surface area and excellent mechanical properties are ideal for a host of electrical applications. The properties of metal oxides like Co3O4 and MnO2 has allowed for increased energy density, while rGO increases charge storage and transport in the electrical double layer at the electrode/electrolyte interface. Graphene and metal oxide composites offer increased energy density and capacitance compared with traditional double layer supercapacitors.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Li, Y., Tan, B., and Wu, Y.. Nano lett. 1, 8 (2008).Google Scholar
2. Gao, Y., Wang, Z., Wan, J., Zou, G., and Qian, Y.. J. Cryst. Growth. 279, 415419 (2005).Google Scholar
3. Zhang, K., Zhang, L.L., Zhao, X.S. and Wu, J.. Chem. of Mat. 22, 13921401 (2010).Google Scholar
4. Stoller, M.D., Park, S., Zhu, Y., An, J., and Ruoff, R.S.. Nano lett. 8 (10), 3498-3502 (2008).Google Scholar
5. Zhang, L.L., Zhou, R. and Zhao, X.S.. J. Mat. Chem. 20, 59835992 (2010).Google Scholar
6. Liu, J., Jiang, J., Cheng, C., Li, H., Zhang, J., Gong, H., and Fan, H.J.. Adv. Mat. 23, 20762081 (2011).Google Scholar
7. Shin, H.Ji., Kim, K.K., Benayad, A., Yoon, S.M., Park, H.K., Jung, I.S., Jin, M.H., Jeong, H.K., Kim, J.M., Choi, J.Y., and Lee, Y.H. Adv. Funct. Mater. 19, 19871992 (2009).Google Scholar
8. An, S. J., Zhu, Y., Lee, S. H., Stoller, M. D., Emilsson, T., Park, S., Velamakanni, A., An, J., and Ruoff, R.S.. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 1, 12591263 (2010).Google Scholar