Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T02:49:38.209Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Growth and Characterization of Epitaxial GaAs Deposited by Plasma-Enhanced Metal-Organic Chemical Vapor Deposition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

A. D. Huelsman
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering
E. Yoon
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering
R. Reif
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA. 02139
Get access

Abstract

Epitaxial GaAs films have been deposited using a Plasma-Enhanced Metal Organic Chemical Vapor Deposition (PE-MOCVD) technique. This technique uses an RF discharge to dissociate arsine and hydrogen upstream from the substrate. The plasma increases the partial pressure of arsenic above the substrate and improves the growth and quality of GaAs films grown at low teyperature and with low arsine flow rates. We have used photoluminescence, Hall measurements, dislocation etches, and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) to study the properties of films grown with and without plasma. enhancement under a variety of reactor conditions. Specular epitaxial layers of n-GaAs were grown with and without plastua at, very low pressures (2 – 3 Torr) on semiinsulating GaAs substrates. Layers grown both with and without the plasma showed good mobility and photoluminescence at deposition temperatures of 650°C. At lower deposition temperatures the films deposited with the plasma were better than those deposited without the plasma. A KOH-NaOH eutectic etch revealed a better structural quality in films deposited with plasma at low arsine partial pressure.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Mino, N., Kohayashi, M., Konagai, M., Takahashi, K., J. Appl. Phys. 59, 2216 (1986).Google Scholar
[2] Sakai, S., Yamamoto, S. and Umeno, M., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 25, 1156 (1986).Google Scholar
[3] Donahue, T. J., Reif, R., J. Appl. Phys. 57, 2757 (1985).Google Scholar
[4] Pande, K. P. and Seabaugh, A. C., J. Electrochem. Soc. 131, 1357 (1984).Google Scholar
[5] Shuskus, A. J., Cowher, M. F., U. S. Patent No.#4,421,592, (1983).Google Scholar
[6] Donahue, T. J., Burger, W. R. and Reif, R., Appl. Phys. Lett. 44, 346 (1984).Google Scholar
[7] Hariu, T., Takenaka, K., Shibuya, S., Komatsu, Y. and Shibata, Y., Thin Solid Films 80, 235 (1981).Google Scholar
[8] H. Heinecke, Brauers, A., Luth, H., Balk, P., Proceedings of the Third International Coliferince on Metalorganic Vapor Phase Epitaxy, Edited by Stringfellow, G. B. (North-lhollaind, Netherlands, 1986) p. 211.Google Scholar
[9] Smith, F. T. J.. J. Crystal Growth 67, 573 (1984).Google Scholar
[10] Beneking, H., Escobosa, A. and Krautle, H., J. Electron. Mater. 10, 473 (1981).Google Scholar
[11] Mori, H. and Takagishi, S, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 23, L877 (1984).Google Scholar
[12] Kuech, T. F. and Veuhoff, E, J. Crystal Growth 68, 148 (1984).Google Scholar