Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T14:36:28.727Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Hydrothermal Synthesis of Lithium Iron Phosphate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Jiajun Chen  and
M. Stanley Whittingham
Jiajun Chen
Affiliation:
jchen9@binghamton.edu, Binghamton University, Chemistry Department, Vestal Parkway East, Binghamton, NY, 13902, United States
M. Stanley Whittingham
Affiliation:
stanwhit@binghamton.edu, Binghamton University, Chemistry Department, Binghamton, NY, 13902, United States
Get access

Abstract

Well-crystalline LiFePO4 particles were successfully prepared in the temperature range between 120 and 220°C, and complete ion ordering was obtained above 175°C where the unit cell dimensions were identical to high temperature material. The use of a soluble reductant, such as sugar or ascorbic acid, was found to minimize the oxidation of the iron to ferric. The electronic conductivity was enhanced by the deposition of carbon from the sugar, or by the addition of carbon nanotubes to the hydrothermal reactor when over 90% of the lithium could be de-intercalated electrochemically. We have extended the hydrothermal synthesis method to the Mn, Co and Ni analogs as well as to the mixed phosphates, such as LiMnyFe1-yPO4.

Keywords

hydrothermalenergy-storagex-ray diffraction (XRD)
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 972: Symposium AA – Solid-State Ionics—2006 , 2006 , 0972-AA13-08
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Padhi, A. K., Nanjundaswamy, K. S. and Goodenough, J. B., J. Electrochem. Soc. 144, 1188 (1997).Google Scholar
2. Ravet, N., Goodenough, J. B., Besner, S., Simoneau, M., Hovington, P. and Armand, M., Electrochem. Soc. Abstr. 99–2, 127 (1999).Google Scholar
3. Chung, S.-Y., Bloking, J. T. and Chiang, Y.-M., Nat. Mater. 1, 123 (2002).Google Scholar
4. Huang, H., Yin, S.-C. and Nazar, L. F., Electrochem. Solid State Lett. 4, A170 (2001).Google Scholar
5. Herle, P. S., Ellis, B., Coombs, N. and Nazar, L. F., Nat. Mater. 3, 147(2004).Google Scholar
6. Whittingham, M. S., Song, Y., Lutta, S., Zavalij, P. Y. and Chernova, N. A., J. Mater. Chem. 15, 3362 (2005).Google Scholar
7. Yang, S., Zavalij, P. Y. and Whittingham, M. S., Electrochem. Commun. 3, 505 (2001)Google Scholar
8. Yang, S., Song, Y., Zavalij, P. Y., and Whittingham, M. S., Electrochem. Commun. 4, 239 (2002).Google Scholar
9. Shoji, H., Toshikazu, K., Toshimi, F. and Makoto, F., Japan Patent Application, 2002-151082.Google Scholar
10. Nespard, G., Wimmler, L. and Eisgruber, M., German patent Application DE10353266.8 (2003); Canadian Publication 2537278 (2004).Google Scholar
11. Chen, J. and Whittingham, M. S., Electrochem. Commun. 8,588 (2006).Google Scholar
12. Larson, A. C. and Von Dreele, R. B., General Structure Analysis System (GSAS), Los Alamos National Laboratory Report LAUR, 86, 748 (2000).Google Scholar
13. Chen, J., Zavalij, P. Y. and Whittingham, M. S., Acta Cryst., in press.Google Scholar