Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T22:56:36.039Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Influence of Environmental Conditions and Passive Film Properties on the MIC of Engineered Barriers in the Yucca Mountain Repository

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2011

A.C. Lloyd ,
R.J. Schuler ,
J.J. Noël ,
D.W. Shoesmith  and
F. King
A.C. Lloyd
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, N6A 5B7, Canada
R.J. Schuler
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, N6A 5B7, Canada
J.J. Noël
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, N6A 5B7, Canada
D.W. Shoesmith
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, N6A 5B7, Canada
F. King
Affiliation:
Integrity Corrosion Consulting, Calgary, Alberta, T3B 3K8, Canada, fraser.king@shaw.ca
Get access

Abstract

A combination of gamma radiation fields, the absence of moisture, and the high temperatures on the drip shield (DS) and waste package (WP) should combine to suspend microbial activity on the DS/WP surfaces for many tens of thousands of years. This lack of microbial activity, coupled with the corrosion resistance of the titanium Grade7 (Ti-7 drip shield) and the Alloy-22 (waste package) materials make microbially induced corrosion (MIC) of these engineered barrier materials extremely unlikely.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 824: Symposium CC – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXVIII , 2004 , CC1.9
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Meike, A. and Stroes-Gascoyne, S., “Review of microbial responses to abiotic environmental factors in the context of the proposed Yucca Mountain repository.” Atomic Energy of Canada Limited Report, AECL-12101 (2000).Google Scholar
2. Stroes-Gascoyne, S. and King, F., “Microbially influenced corrosion issues in high-level nuclear waste repositories.” In Proc. CORROSION/02 Research Topical Symposia,(NACE International, Houston, TX, 2002).Google Scholar
3. Pedersen, K., “Microbial processes in radioactive waste disposal.” Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Company Report, SKB TR 00-04 (2000).Google Scholar
4. Little, B., Wagner, P. and Mansfeld, F., Int. Mater. Rev. 36, 253–272 (1991).Google Scholar
5. Else, T.A., Pantle, C.R., and Amy, P.S., Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69, 5006–5010 (2003).Google Scholar
6. Horn, J., Carrillo, C., and Dias, V., “Comparison of the microbial community composition at Yucca Mountain and laboratory test nuclear repository environments.” CORROSION/2003 (NACE International, Houston, TX, 2003), paper no. 03556.Google Scholar
7. King, F.. and Stroes-Gascoyne, S., “Microbially influenced corrosionof nuclear fuel waste disposal containers.” In Proceedings 1995 International Conference on Microbially Influenced Corrosion, NACE International, Houston, TX, paper 35 (1995).Google Scholar
8. King, F. and Stroes-Gascoyne, S., “Predicting the effects of microbial activity on the corrosion of copper nuclear waste disposal containers,” in Microbial Degradation Processes in Radioactive Waste repository and in Nuclear Fuel Storage Areas, J.H. Wolfram, (ed.), Kluwer Press, Dordrecht, p. 149–162 (1997).Google Scholar
9. Pitonzo, B., Rudin, M., and Amy, P.S., Radiat. Res. 152, 71–75 (1999).Google Scholar
10. Pitonzo, B., Rudin, M., and Amy, P.S., Radiat. Res. 152, 64–70 (1999).Google Scholar
11. Brown, A.D., Microbial Water Stress Physiology (John Wiley, Chichester, U.K., 1990).Google Scholar