Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T11:27:19.265Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Magnetic Anisotropy and Rotational Hysteresis Loss in Epitaxial TbFe2(110) Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Chuei-Tang Wang
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305–2205
Gaurav Khanna
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305–2205
Bruce M. Clemens
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305–2205
Robert L. White
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305–2205
Get access

Abstract

The effect of in-plane strain on the magnetic anisotropy of [110]-oriented epitaxial TbFe2 films was studied. DC magnetron cosputtering was used to grow epitaxial TbFe2(110) films on A12O3(1120) substrates with an epitaxial Nb(110) buffer layer. Torque magnetometry showed that the films had uniaxial anisotropy, and the torque curves were used to determine the magnetic anisotropy constants of the films by analyzing the rotational hysteresis loss. Film strain was measured using synchrotron radiation. The film strain and anisotropy measurements confirm that the uniaxial anisotropy results from tensile strain in the TbFe2(110) films. This agrees with theoretical calculations of magnetic anisotropy which show that tensile strains can induce a uniaxial anisotropy in TbFe2(110) films.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Clark, A.E., in Ferromagnetic Materials, edited by Wohlfarth, E. P. (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1980), p. 531.Google Scholar
2. Wang, C.T., Osgood, R.M. III, White, R.L., and Clemens, B.M., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 384, pp. 7984, (1995).Google Scholar
3. Wang, C.T., Clemens, B.M., and White, R.L., IEEE Trans. Magn., 32, pp. 47525754, (1996).Google Scholar
4. Cullity, B.D., Introduction to Magnetic Materials, Addison-Wesley, 1972, pp. 222223.Google Scholar
5. Chikazumi, S. and Charap, S.H., Physics of Magnetism, Kreiger, Malabar, Florida, 1986, pp. 167170.Google Scholar
6. Kautzky, M.C. and Clemens, B.M., Appl. Phys. Lett., 49, pp. 12791281, (1995).Google Scholar
7. Bain, J.A., Ph.D. Dissertation, Stanford University, 1993, pp. 2124.Google Scholar
8. Oderno, V., Dufour, C., Dumesnil, K., Mangin, P., and Marchai, G., J. Crystal. Growth, 165, pp. 175–8, (1996).Google Scholar
9. Robaut, F., Ph.D. Dissertation, Université Joseph Fourier, Grenoble I, France, 1995, pp. 8893.Google Scholar
10. Jacobs, I.S. and Luborsky, F.E., J. App. Phys., 28, pp. 467473, (1957).Google Scholar