Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T14:18:45.121Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Micro Fracture Toughness Testing of TiAl Based Alloys with a Fully Lamellar Structure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

K. Takashima ,
T. P. Halford ,
D. Rudinal ,
Y. Higo  and
M. Takeyama
K. Takashima
Affiliation:
Precision and Intelligence Laboratory, Tokyo Institute of Technology, R2–35 4259 Nagatsuta, Midori-ku, Yokohama, 226–8503, Japan
T. P. Halford
Affiliation:
Precision and Intelligence Laboratory, Tokyo Institute of Technology, R2–35 4259 Nagatsuta, Midori-ku, Yokohama, 226–8503, Japan
D. Rudinal
Affiliation:
Precision and Intelligence Laboratory, Tokyo Institute of Technology, R2–35 4259 Nagatsuta, Midori-ku, Yokohama, 226–8503, Japan
Y. Higo
Affiliation:
Precision and Intelligence Laboratory, Tokyo Institute of Technology, R2–35 4259 Nagatsuta, Midori-ku, Yokohama, 226–8503, Japan
M. Takeyama
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgy and Ceramics Science, Tokyo Institute of Technology, S8–8 2–12–1 Ookayama, Meguro-Ku, Tokyo, 152–8552, Japan
Get access

Abstract

A micro-sized testing technique has been applied to investigate the fracture properties of lamellar colonies in a fully lamellar Ti-46Al-5Nb-1W alloy. Micro-sized cantilever specimens with a size ≈ 10 × 10 × 50 μm3 were prepared by focused ion beam machining. Notches with a width of 0.5 μm and a depth of 5 μm were also introduced into the micro-sized specimens by focused ion beam machining. Fracture tests were successfully completed using a mechanical testing machine for micro-sized specimens at room temperature. The fracture toughness (KQ) values obtained were in the range 1.4–7 MPam1/2. Fracture surface observations indicate that these variations are attributable to differences in local lamellar orientations ahead of the notch. These fracture toughness values are also lower than those having been previously reported in conventional samples. This may be due the absence of significant extrinsic toughening mechanisms in these micro-sized specimens. Fracture mechanisms of these alloys are also considered on the micrometer scale. The results obtained in this investigation give important and fundamental information on the development of TiAl based alloys with high fracture toughness.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 842: Symposium S – Integrative and Interdisciplinary Aspects of Intermetallics , 2004 , S5.44
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Schafrik, R. E., in Proceedings of third International Symposium on Structural Intermetallics (ISSI 3), edited by Hemker, K. J., Dimiduk, D. M., et al. (TMS, Warrendale, PA, 2002), pp.1317.Google Scholar
2. Pather, R., Wisbey, A., Partridge, A., Halford, T., Horspool, D. N., Bowen, P. and Kestler, H., in Proceedings of third International Symposium on Structural Intermetallics (ISSI 3), edited by Hemker, K. J., Dimiduk, D. M., et al. (TMS, Warrendale, PA, 2002), pp.207–215.Google Scholar
3. Huang, S. C. and Hall, E. L., Metall. Trans. A., 22A, 427 (1991).Google Scholar
4. Kim, Y., Acta Metall., 40, 1121 (1992).Google Scholar
5. Ritchie, R. O., International Journal of Fracture, 100, 55 (1999).Google Scholar
6. Nakano, T., Kawanaka, T., Yasuda, H. Y. and Umakoshi, Y., Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 194, 43 (1995).Google Scholar
7. Yokoshima, S. and Yamaguchi, M., Acta Mater, 44, 873 (1996).Google Scholar
8. Chan, K. S., Metall. Trans. A, 24A, 569 (1993).Google Scholar
9. Chan, K. S. and Kim, Y. W., Acta Metall., 43, 439 (1995).Google Scholar
10. Higo, Y., Takashima, K., Shimojo, M., Sugiura, S., Pfister, B. and Swain, M. V., in Materials Science of Microelectromechanical Systems (MEMS) Devices II, edited by de Boer, M. P., Heuer, A. H., Jacobs, S. J. and Peeters, E., (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 605, Pittsburgh, PA, 2000), pp. 241–246.Google Scholar
11. Maekawa, S., Takashima, K., Shimojo, M., Higo, Y., Sugiura, S., Pfister, B. and Swain, M. V., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 38, 7194 (1999).Google Scholar
12. Takashima, K., Higo, Y., Sugiura, S. and Shimojo, M., Mat. Trans., 42, 68 (2001).Google Scholar
13. Takashima, K., Shimojo, M., Higo, Y. and Swain, M. V., ASTS STP-1413, 72 (2001).Google Scholar
14. Takashima, K., Koyama, S., Nakai, K. and Higo, Y., in Nano- and Microelectromechanical Systems (NEMS and MEMS) and Molecular Machines, edited by LaVan, D. A., Ayon, A. A., Buchhiet, T. E. and Madou, M. J., (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 741, Pittsburgh, PA, 2000), pp. 35–40.Google Scholar
15. Okamura, H., Introduction to Linear Fracture Mechanics, (Baifukan, Tokyo, 1976) pp.218 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
16. Chan, K.S., Wang, P., Bhate, N. and Kumar, K. S., Acta Mater., 52, 4601 (2004).Google Scholar
17. Yoo, M. H. and Yoshimi, K., Intermetallics, 8, 1215 (2000).Google Scholar
18. Halford, T.P., Fatigue and Fracture of a High Strength, Fully Lamellar γ-TiAl based Alloy, PhD Thesis, The University of Birmingham, (2003).Google Scholar
19. Rao, K. T. V., Kim, Y. W., Muhlstein, C. L. and Ritchie, R. O., Mat. Sci. Eng. A, 192/193, 474 (1995)Google Scholar