Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T03:05:18.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Plasma Chemical Aspects of Magnetron Ion Etching with CF4/O2 and CF4/H2

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

A. A. Bright
Affiliation:
IBM Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY 10598
S. Kaushik
Affiliation:
IBM Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY 10598
G. S. Oehrlein
Affiliation:
IBM Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY 10598
Get access

Abstract

Magnetron plasmas are of great current interest for semiconductor manufacturing applications because of their high ion density and low operating pressure. We have studied the properties of a magnetron ion etching system using CF4, CF4/O2, and CF4/H2 with respect to the plasma chemistry and the interaction of the plasma with the etched substrate. The higher dissociation and ionization rates lead to significant changes in the species present in the plasma as compared to a conventional reactive ion etching (RIE) plasma. The F atom concentration in a CF4 magnetron plasma is much higher than in a RIE plasma. The addition of O2 leads to only a small further enhancement and produces a decrease in the Si etch rate. Addition of H2 suppresses the F atom concentration slightly, produces very little C-F polymer, and does not lead to highly selective etching of SiO2 over Si. The highly dissociated species in the magnetron plasma produce less C-F polymer, both on the wafer and on the chamber walls, relative to RIE.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

1 Lin, I, Hinson, D. C., Class, W. H., Sandstrom, R. L., and Passierb, F., Electrochem. Soc. Extended Abstracts 83–1, 132 (1983).Google Scholar
2 Horiike, Y., Okano, H., Yamazaki, T., and Horie, H., Jap. J. AppI. Phys. 20, L817 (1981).Google Scholar
3 Lin, I, J. Appl. Phys 58, 2981 (1985).Google Scholar
4 Hirobe, K. and Azuma, H., J. Electrochem. Soc. 132, 1638 (1985).Google Scholar
5 Wicker, T. E. and Mantei, T. D., J. Appl. Phys 57, 1638 (1985).Google Scholar
6 Debaene, F. and Chollet, J. P., Electrochem. Soc. Extended Abstracts 85–2, 419 (1985).Google Scholar
7 Bobbio, S. M. and Ho, Y.-S., Electrochem. Soc. Extended Abstracts 85–2, 421 (1985).Google Scholar
8 Steinbruchel, Ch., Curtis, B. J., Lehmann, H. W., and Widmer, R., IEEE Trans. on Plasma Science PS–14, 137 (1986).Google Scholar
9 Contolini, R. J. and D'Asaro, L. A., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B4, 706 (1986).Google Scholar
10 Winters, H. F., Cobum, J. W., and Kay, E., J. Appl. Phys. 48, 4973 (1977).Google Scholar
11 Mogab, C. J., Adams, A. C., and Flamm, D. L., J. Appl. Phys. 49, 3796 (1978).Google Scholar
12 Oehrlein, G. S., Coyle, G. J., Clabes, J. G., and Lee, Y. H., Surface and Interface Analysis 9, 275 (1986).Google Scholar
13 Kay, Eric, Methods and Materials in Microelectronic Technology, edited by Bargon, J., (Plenum, New York, 1984), p. 243.Google Scholar