Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T02:10:34.286Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Pulsed Laser Deposition of Collagen Thin Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

J. A. Conklin
Affiliation:
US Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC 20375
C. M. Cotell
Affiliation:
US Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC 20375
T. W. Barnett
Affiliation:
US Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC 20375
D. C. Hansen
Affiliation:
US Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC 20375
Get access

Abstract

Thin films of collagen were prepared by pulsed laser deposition (PLD) at room temperature on Si substrates using a KrF laser (248 nm) over a fluence range from 0.2–1.5 Jcm-2. The effects on film composition and morphology of ambient gas (Ar, Ar/H2O vapor), quenching atmosphere (Ar, Ar/H2O vapor), and fluence were examined. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT- IR) demonstrated that, independent of deposition parameter, the PLD films contained the characteristic Amide I and II functionalities of the collagen target and indicated that the secondary structure was altered by the PLD process. The surface morphology of the films was a function of the laser fluence and the gas environment during either film deposition or quenching at the end of deposition. Preliminary gel electrophoresis examination of deposited films suggested the collagen had not maintained the triple helical structure of the native collagen. X-Ray diffraction (XRD) indicated that all of the films, deposited under any conditions, were predominantly amorphous.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Yannas, I.V., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 29, p. 20 (1990).Google Scholar
2. Puliafito, C.A., Wong, K., Steinert, R.F., Lasers in Surg. and Med. 7, p. 155 (1987).Google Scholar
3. Garrison, B.J. and Srinivasan, R., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 3, p. 746 (1985).Google Scholar
4. a) Blanchet, G.B., et al., Science 262, p. 719 (1993). b) D.L.Singleton, G.Paraskevopoulos and R.S.Taylor, Appl. Phys. B. 50, p. 227 (1990). c) F.D.Egitto and C.R.Davis, Appl. Phys. B. 55, p. 488 (1992).Google Scholar
5. Davis, C.R., Egitto, F.D. and Buchwalter, S.L., Appl. Phys. B. 54, p. 227 (1992).Google Scholar
6. Cotell, C.M., Appl. Surf. Sci. 69, p. 140 (1993).Google Scholar
7. Ozaki, Y., Mizuno, A., Kaneuchi, F., Appl. Spect. 46, p. 626 (1992).Google Scholar
8. Silverstein, S.M., Bassler, G.C., Morrill, T.C., Spectrometric Identification of Organic Compounds, 4th ed. (John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1981).Google Scholar
9. Whitesell, J.K., Science 261, p. 73 (1993).Google Scholar
10. Blank, D.H.A., IJsselsteijn, R.P.J., Out, P.J., Kuipper, H.J.H., Floksura, J., Rogalla, H., Mater. Sci. Eng. B13, p. 67 (1992).Google Scholar
11. Loeb, GI. and Baier, R.E., J. Coll. and Inter. Sci. 27, p. 38 (1968).Google Scholar
12. Jackson, M., Haris, P.I. and Chapman, D., J. Molec. Struct. 214, p. 329 (1989).Google Scholar