Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-mzp66 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-15T06:53:48.077Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Reaction of Synthetic Nuclear Waste Glass in Steam and Hydrothernal Solution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

W. L. Ebert  and
J. K. Bates
W. L. Ebert
Affiliation:
Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 South Cass Avenue, Argonne, IL 60439.
J. K. Bates
Affiliation:
Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 South Cass Avenue, Argonne, IL 60439.
Get access

Abstract

Glass monoliths of the WVC4M4, WVCM50, SRL 165, and SRL 202 compositions were reacted in steam and in hydrothermal liquid at 200°C. The glass reaction resulted in the formation of leached surface layers in both environments. The reaction in steam proceeds at a very low rate until precipitates form, after which the glass reaction proceeds at a greater rate. Precipitates were formed on all glass types reacted in steam. The assemblage of phases formed was unique to each glass type, but several precipitates were common to all glasses, including analcime, gyrolite, and weeksite. Reaction in steam occurs in a thin layer of condensed water which becomes saturated with respect to the observed phases after only a few days of reaction. The reaction in steam is accelerated relative to reaction in hydrothermal liquid In the sense that secondary phases form after a shorter reaction time, that is, after less glass has reacted, because of the smaller effective leachant volume present in the steam environment. A knowledge of the secondary phases which form and their influence on the glass reaction rate is crucial to the modeling effort of the repository program.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 176: Symposium U – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XIII , 1989 , 339
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Site Characterization Plan, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management, DOE report DOE/RW-0199 (1988).Google Scholar
2. Grambow, B. and Strachan, D. M., “A Comparison of the Performance of Nuclear Waste Glass by Modeling,” Battelle Pacific Northwest Laboratory report PNL-6698 (1988).Google Scholar
3. Biwer, B. M., Bates, J. K., and Abrajano, T. A. Jr, “Comparison of the Layer Structure of Vapor Phase and Leached SRL Glass by Use of AEM,” this volume (1989).Google Scholar
4. Abrajano, T. A. Jr, Bates, J. K., and Byers, C. D., “Aqueous Corrosion of Natural Nuclear Waste Glasses. I. Comparative Rates of Hydration in Liquid and Vapor Environments at Elevated Temperatures,” J. Non-Cryst. Solids 84, 251 (1986).Google Scholar
5. Hall, A. C., “Optical Studies of Thin Films on Surfaces of Fused Quartz,” J. Phys. Chem. 74, 2742 (1970).Google Scholar
6. Ebert, W. L. and Hoburg, R. F., Argonne National Laboratory, unpublished data (1989).Google Scholar
7. McHaffie, I. R. and Lenher, S., “The Adsorption of Water from the Gas Phase on Plane Surfaces of Glass and Platinum,” J. Chem. Soc. 127, 1559–1572 (1925).Google Scholar
8. Bayh, W. and Pflug, H., ’Ellipsometrische Messung der Dicke von Adsorptionsschichten auf Ernkristallflachen,” Z. Angew. Phys. 25, 358 (1968).Google Scholar
9. Bates, J. K., Jardine, L. J., and Steindler, M. J., “Hydration Aging of Nuclear Waste Glasses,” Science 218, 51 (1982).Google Scholar