Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T10:35:59.579Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Simulations of Polymeric Membrane Formation by Immersion Precipitation: Liquid-liquid Demixing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Bo Zhou
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, U.S.A.
Adam Powell
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

The immersion precipitation process makes most commercial microporous membranes, which enjoy widespread use in filtration and purification. This process begins with liquid-liquid demixing of a nonsolvent/solvent/polymer ternary system into polymer-rich and polymer-lean phases. This demixing step determines much of the final morphology. In this work, a ternary Cahn-Hilliard formulation incorporating a Flory-Huggins homogeneous free energy function is used to simulate phase separation during demixing. Then the formulation is coupled with constant-viscosity interface-driven fluid flow. Simulations begin with uniform initial conditions with small random fluctuations, and then with two-layer polymer-solvent/nonsolvent initial conditions to simulate actual membrane fabrication conditions. The results are presented in 2-D and 3-D, which demonstrate the effects of mp (degree of polymerization), Kij (gradient penalty coefficients) and χij (Flory-Huggins interaction parameters) on phase separation behavior.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Mulder, M., Basic Principles of Membrane Technology, (Kulwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1992) pp. 120.Google Scholar
2. Tompa, H., Polymer Solutions, (Butterworths Scientific Publications, London, 1956) pp. 182203.Google Scholar
3. Yilmaz, L and McHugh, A.J, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., Polym. Phys 31, 997 (1986); 23, 1271 (1985).Google Scholar
4. Koningsveld, R., Chem. Zvesti 26, 199 (1972).Google Scholar
5. Cohen, C., Tanny, G.B. and Prager, S., J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Phys. 17, 477 (1979).Google Scholar
6. Reuvers, A.J., van den Berg, J.W.A. and Smolders, C.A., J. Membrane Sci. 34, 45 (1987).Google Scholar
7. Tsay, C.S. and McHugh, A.J., J. Polym. Sci., Part B: Polym. Phys., 28, 1327 (1990).Google Scholar
8. Cheng, L.-P., Dwan, A.-H. and Gryte, C.C., J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Phys. 33, 223 (1995);Google Scholar
Cheng, L.-P., Soh, Y.S., Dwan, A.-H. and Gryte, C.C., 32 (1994) 1413;Google Scholar
Cheng, L.P., Lin, D-J, Shin, C-H, Dwan, A-H, Gryte, C. C., 37, 2079 (1999).Google Scholar
9. Kim, Y. D., Kim, J.Y., Lee, H. K., Kim, S. C., J. Membr. Sci. 190, 69 (2001).Google Scholar
10. Saxena, R. and Caneba, G. T., Polym. Eng. and Sci. 42, 1019 (2002).Google Scholar
11. , Akthakul, PhD., thesis, MIT, 2003.Google Scholar
12. Jacqmin, D., Journal of Computational Physics 155, 96127 (1999).Google Scholar