Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T10:32:32.627Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Theoretical Studies of Pt Chemisorption on γ Al2O3.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

J. J. Low
Affiliation:
Allied-Signal Engineered Materials Research Center, 50 East Algonquin Rd., Box 5016,Des Plaines, IL 60017-5016
D. E. Ellis
Affiliation:
Northwestern University, Evanston, I1 60201
Get access

Abstract

Generalized Valence Bond (GVB) and Local Density Functional (LDF) calculations were carried out to explore the influence of electronic structure on the metal-support interaction in Pt/γAl2O3. On the basis of GVB calculations it was found that ethylene can form either di-σ- or π complexes on Pt depending on the oxidation state of the metal. The LDF calculations showed that chemisorbed Pt transfers charge to γ-Al2O3. These results and experimental observations led us to propose a model of the metal-support interaction in which the Pt exists in two oxidation states for reduced Pt/ Al2O3 catalysts.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Goddard, W.A. III, Harding, L.B., Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 29, 363 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. The GVB calculations used a relativistic effective core potential double-ζ basis for Pt (Noel, J.O., Hay, P.J., Inorg. Chem. 21, 14 (1982)), a valence double-ζ basis sets for C, and an unscaled triple-ζ basis for H (T.H. Dunning, Jr., P.J. Hay, In Modern Theoretical Chemistry: Methods of Electronic Structure, edited by H.F. Schaefer III (Plenum, New York, 1977) vol. 3, chapt. 4, pp. 79–127). Geometry optimizations were carried out at the Hatree-Fock level with the Gaussian 82 package (J.S. Binkley, M.J. Frisch, D.J. Defrees, K. Raghavachari, R.A. Whiteside, H.B. Schelgel, E.M. Fuder, J.A. Pople, GAUSSIAN 82, Dept. Of Chem., Carnegie- Mellon University, Pittsburg Pa, 1983). The correlated wavefunctions used to determine bond energies were optimized using the GVB3 multiconfigurational self consistent field program (L.G. Yaffe, W.A. Goddard III, Phys. Rev. A, 13, 1682 (1976)).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Herzberg, G., Molecular Spectra and Molecular Structure. III. Electronic Spectra and Electronic Structure, (Van Nostrand Reinhold Comp., New York, 1966) p. 646.Google Scholar
4. Wisner, J.M., Bartczak, T.J., Ibers, J.A., Low, J.J., Goddard, W.A. III, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 108, 347 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Low, J.J., Goddard, W.A. III, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 108, 6115 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Jarvis, J.A.J., Kilbourn, B.T., Owston, P.G., Acta Crystallogr. B 27, 366 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Hay, P.J., Hunt, W.J., Goddard, W.A. III, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 94, 8293 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Steininger, H., Ibach, H., Lehwald, S., Surf. Sci. 117, 685 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Wilson, S.J., J. Solid State Chem. 30, 247 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. John, C.S., Alma, N.C.M., Hyas, G.R., Applied Catalysis 6, 341 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Soma, Y., J. Catalysis, 75, 267 (1982); T.P. Beebe, Jr., J.T. Yates, Jr., J. Phys. Chem.91, 254 (1987); P.-K. Wang, C.P. Slichter, J.H. Sinfelt, J. Phys. Chem.89, 3606 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Mohsin, S.H., Trenary, M., Robota, H.J., J. Phys. Chem. Submitted for Publication.Google Scholar