Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T04:51:43.168Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Thermal Shock Behavior of Fiber-Reinforced Ceramic Composites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Raj N. Singh  and
Hongyu Wang
Raj N. Singh
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Cincinnati, P.O. Box 210012, Cincinnati, OH 45221-0012
Hongyu Wang
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Cincinnati, P.O. Box 210012, Cincinnati, OH 45221-0012
Get access

Abstract

The influence of fiber type and method of composite fabrication on the thermal shock behavior of 2-D fiber-reinforced ceramic composites is studied. Thermal shock tests are performed using a water quench technique, and thermal shock damage is characterized by both destructive and nondestructive techniques. It is shown that the composites possessed superior resistance to thermal shock damage than the monolithic ceramics. Catastrophic failure due to severe thermal stresses is prevented in composites and a significant portion of their original strength is retained at a quench temperature difference up to 1000°C. These results along with an analysis of the thermal shock damage mechanism based on the destructive and nondestructive tests is described.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 365: Symposium M – Ceramic Matrix Composites–Advanced High-Temperature Structural Materials , 1994 , 441
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Kingery, W. D., J. Am. Ceramn. Soc., 38 [1] 3–15 (1955).Google Scholar
2. Hasselman, D. P. H., Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull., 49 [12] 1033–37 (1970).Google Scholar
3. Hasselman, D.P.H., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 52, 600–604 (1969).Google Scholar
4. Evans, A.G. and Charles, E. A., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 60, 22–28 (1977).Google Scholar
5. Wang, H. Y., Singh, R. N., and Lowden, R. A., Ceram. Eng. Sci. Proc., 15[4], 292–302 (1994).Google Scholar
6. Pickett, G., Proceedings, Am. Soc. Testing Mater., Vol. 45, pp. 846–65 (1945).Google Scholar
7. Spinner, S. and Tefft, W. E., Proceedings ASTM, Vol 61, 1229–43 (1961).Google Scholar
8. Lamicq, P. J., Bernhart, G. A., Dauchier, M. M., and Macc, J. G., Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull., 65 [2] 336–38 (1986).Google Scholar
9. Bhatt, R. T. and Phillips, R. E., J. Mater. Sci., 25, 3401–07 (1990).Google Scholar
10. Wang, H. and Singh, R.N., Effects of Post-Deposition Treatments on the Mechanical Properties of a CVD SiC,” Submitted for publication in J. Am. Ceram. Soc. (1994).Google Scholar