Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-mzp66 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-15T06:43:05.063Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Transient Versus Steady State Measurements on the Transport Properties of a-SI:H Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

M. Vieira ,
R. Martins ,
E. Fortunato ,
F. Soares  and
L. Guimarães
M. Vieira
Affiliation:
Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia da Universidade Nova de Lisboa Quinta da Torre, 2825 Monte da Caparica, Portugal.
R. Martins
Affiliation:
Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia da Universidade Nova de Lisboa Quinta da Torre, 2825 Monte da Caparica, Portugal.
E. Fortunato
Affiliation:
Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia da Universidade Nova de Lisboa Quinta da Torre, 2825 Monte da Caparica, Portugal.
F. Soares
Affiliation:
Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia da Universidade Nova de Lisboa Quinta da Torre, 2825 Monte da Caparica, Portugal.
L. Guimarães
Affiliation:
Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia da Universidade Nova de Lisboa Quinta da Torre, 2825 Monte da Caparica, Portugal.
Get access

Abstract

Transient and steady-state measurements of the ambipolar diffusion length (L*) in undoped a-Si:H films have been carried out through Flying Spot Technique (FST) and Spectral Photovoltage Technique (SPT) using either Schottky or pin structures. The FST is based on the photovoltage response of a monochromatic light that moves with a constant velocity in the interface direction, while in SPT the optical excitation is achieved by changing the absorption coefficient of the incident light and so, the light depth penetration. In FST the additional photo-effect due to the light spot movement allows to infer separately L* and the effective lifetime, (τ*) while in SPT the curve shape of the spectral response allows to estimate the interface behavior and L*. The obtained results reveal that the transient measurement is useful for determining the transport properties of the bulk while the steady technique seems to be more useful to infer the role of the interface on device performances. Limitations of the above techniques will also be reported.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 258: Symposium A – Amorphous Silicon Technology – 1992 , 1992 , 753
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Moore, A.R., Appl Phy Letters 40, 403 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] Moore, A.R., J. Appl Phy 56, 2796 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3] Ritter, D., Zeldov, E., Appl Phy Letters 49, 79 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4] Ritter, D., Weiser, K. and Zeldov, E., J. Appl Phy 62, 4563 (1987) (Acad. Press, New York, 1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5] Martins, R., Vieira, M., Soares, F. and Guimarães, L.: in Proc. PVSEC, (Kyoto, 1990) 975.Google Scholar
[6] Vieira, M., Martins, R., Fortunato, E., Soares, F., and Guimarães, L., J. of non Crystaline solids 137&138 (1991).Google Scholar
[7] Torkel, J. Wallmark, Proc. of IRE 45, 474,(1957).Google Scholar
[8] Vieira, M., Martins, R., Fortunato, E., Soares, F., and Guimarães, L., Proc. MRS Anaheim. (1991)Google Scholar
[9] Fortunato, E., Martins, R., Vieira, M., and Guimarães, L., 10th EPVSEC, Lisboa, 1991.Google Scholar
[10] DeVore, H. B., Phys. Rev., 102 (1956) 86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11] Martins, R., Guimarães, L., Fortunato, E., Maçarico, A., Santos, M. and Ferreira, I.: in Proc. 8 th EPVSEC (Florence, 1988) 653.Google Scholar