Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T22:31:15.641Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Encompassing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2020

David F. Hendry
David F. Hendry*
Affiliation:
Nuffield College, Oxford and Duke University, Durham, N.C., U.S.A.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Rival theoretical explanations of events and phenomena are common in economics, of which the Keynesian versus the monetarist debate is perhaps the best known. The traditional empirical procedure in economics has been to formulate a model from each theoretical framework and test each model's restrictions against observed data, rejecting or corroborating the specific model accordingly as the evidence is adverse or favourable. Although such an approach seems objective and scientific, it has two serious drawbacks: in practice neither rejection nor corroboration are definitive.

Type
Articles
Information
National Institute Economic Review , Volume 125 , August 1988 , pp. 88 - 103
Copyright
Copyright © 1988 National Institute of Economic and Social Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

(1)

I am indebted to the ESRC for financial support towards this research and to Graham Mizon, Adrian Neale, Jean-François Richard and an anonymous referee for helpful comments.

References

Ahumada, H. (1985), ‘An encompassing test of two models of the balance of trade for Argentina’, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, vol. 47, pp.51–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronfenbrenner, J. (1953), ‘Sources and size of least-squares bias in a two-equation model’ in Hood, W.C. and Koopmans, T.C. (eds), Studies in Econometric Method, Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Chong, Y.Y. and Hendry, D.F. (1986), ‘Econometric evaluation of linear macro-economic models’, The Review of Economic Studies, vol. 53, pp.671–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, D.R. (1961), ‘Tests of separate families of hypotheses’ in Proceedings of the Fourth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, vol.1, pp.105-23.Google Scholar
Cox, D.R. (1962), ‘Further results on tests of separate families of hypotheses’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, vol. 24, pp.406–24.Google Scholar
Cross, R. (1982), ‘The Duhem-Quine thesis, Lakatos and the appraisal of theories in macro-economics’, Economic Journal, vol. 92, pp.320–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, J.E.H., Hendry, D.F., Srba, F. and Yeo, J.S. (1978), ‘Econometric modelling of the aggregate time-series relationship between consumers' expenditure and income in the United Kingdom’, Economic Journal, vol. 88, pp.661–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deaton, A.S. (1977), ‘Involuntary saving through unanticipated inflation’, American Economic Review, vol. 67, pp.899–910.Google Scholar
Ericsson, N.R. and Hendry, D.F. (1985), ‘Conditional econometric modelling: an application to new house prices in the United Kingdom’ in Atkinson, A.C. and Fienberg, S.E. (eds), A Celebration of Statistics, Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
Florens, J.P., Hendry, D.F. and Richard, J-F. (1987a), ‘An information matrix approach to parsimonious encompassing’, ISDS Discussion Paper no.8709, Duke University.Google Scholar
Florens, J.P., Hendry, D.F. and Richard, J-F. (1987b), ‘Encompassing and specificity’, mimeo, ISDS, Duke University.Google Scholar
Frisch, R. (1933), ‘Pitfalls in the statistical construction of demand and supply curves’, Veröffentlichungen der Frankfurter Gesellschaft für Konjunkturforschung, new series vol.5.Google Scholar
Ghysels, E. and Hall, A. (1987), ‘Testing non-nested Euler conditions with quadrature based methods of approximations’, mimeo, University of Montreal.Google Scholar
Govaerts, B. (1987), ‘Application of the encompassing principle to linear dynamic models’, Ph.D. dissertation, Université Catholique de Louvain.Google Scholar
Hendry, D.F. (1975), ‘The consequences of mis-specification of dynamic structure, autocorrelation and simultaneity in a simple model with an application to the demand for imports’ in Renton, G.A. (ed.), Modelling the Economy, Heinemann.Google Scholar
Hendry, D.F. (1986), ‘The use of PC-GIVE in econometrics teaching’, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, vol. 48, pp.87–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendry, D.F. (1987), ‘Econometric methodology: a personal perspective’ in Bewley, T.F. (ed.), Advances in Econometrics, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hendry, D.F. (1988), ‘The encompassing implications of feedback v. feedforward mechanisms in econometrics’, Oxford Economic Papers, vol. 40, pp.132–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendry, D.F. and Anderson, G.J. (1977), ‘Testing dynamic specification in small simultaneous systems: an application to a model of building society behaviour in the United Kingdom’ in Intriligator, M.D. (ed.), Frontiers in Quantitative Economics, vol.3A, pp.361–83, North-Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Hendry, D.F. and Neale, A.J. (1988), ‘Interpreting long-run equilibrium solutions in conventional macro models: a comment’, Economic Journal, forthcoming.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendry, D.F. and Richard, J-F. (1982), ‘On the formulation of empirical models in dynamic econometrics’, Journal of Econometrics, vol. 20, pp.3–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendry, D.F. and Richard, J-F. (1983), ‘The econometric analysis of economic time series’, International Statistical Review, vol. 51, pp.111–63.Google Scholar
Hendry, D.F. and Richard, J-F. (1988), ‘Recent developments in the theory of encompassing’, CORE 20th anniversary volume, MIT Press, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Hendry, D.F. and von Ungern-Sternberg, T. (1981), ‘Liquidity and inflation effects on consumers' expenditure’ in Deaton, A.S. (ed.), Essays in the Theory and Measurement of Consumer Behaviour, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kent, J.T. (1986), ‘The underlying structure of non-nested hypothesis tests’, Biometrika, vol. 73, pp.333–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakatos, I. (1978), The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes, [J. Worrall and G. Currie], vol.1, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, R.E. (1976), ‘Econometric policy evaluation: a critique’ in Brunner, J. and Meltzer, A.H. (eds), The Phillips Curve and Labour Markets, Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy no.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKinnon, J.G. (1983), ‘Model specification tests against non-nested alternatives’, Econometric Reviews, vol. 2, 85–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mizon, G.E. (1984), ‘The encompassing approach in econometrics’ in Hendry, D.F. and Wallis, K.F. (eds), Econometrics and Quantitative Economics, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Mizon, G.E. and Richard, J-F. (1986), ‘The encompassing principle and its application to testing non-nested hypotheses’, Econometrica, vol. 54, pp.657–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pesaran, M. (1974), ‘On the general problem of model selection’, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 41, pp.153–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popper, K. (1963), Conjectures and Refutations, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
Sargan, J.D., (1964),‘Wages and prices in the United Kingdom: a study in econometric modelling’, in Hart, P. E., Mills, G. and Whitaker, J. K., Econometric Analysis for National Economic Planning, Butterworths; reprinted in Hendry, D. F. and Wallis, K.F. (eds), Econometrics and Quantatitive Economics, chapter 10, Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar